Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 1061–1080 | Cite as

Personality, coping, and school well-being: an investigation of high school students

  • Paul Evans
  • Andrew J. Martin
  • Zorana Ivcevic
Article

Abstract

With a growing interest in well-being as an outcome of schooling, there is an increased need for research on how to enable it in students’ academic lives. This study examined personality and coping strategies as predictors of students’ well-being outcomes at school using structural equation modelling. Students (N = 328) completed measures of personality and coping strategies, and then approximately 6 months later reported on their satisfaction with school and subjective well-being. Results indicated that, along with personality and sociodemographics, productive coping strategies were associated with school satisfaction and subjective well-being 6 months later. The findings suggest that coping strategies used by adolescents to deal with the stresses of school have important consequences. Interventions to increase school students’ use of productive coping strategies may have meaningful impacts on their well-being.

Keywords

Personality Coping Well-being School satisfaction 

References

  1. Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1992). Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 989–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bögels, S., Hoogstad, B., Van Dun, L., De Schutter, S., & Restifo, K. (2008). Mindfulness training for adolescents with externalizing disorders and their parents. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36(2), 193–209.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465808004190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bordwine, V. C., & Huebner, E. S. (2010). The role of coping in mediating the relationship between positive affect and school satisfaction in adolescents. Child Indicators Research, 3(3), 349–366.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9063-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley, K. D., Cunningham, J. D., & Gilman, R. (2014). Measuring adolescent life satisfaction: A psychometric investigation of the multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale (MSLSS). Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1333–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9478-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burrow, A. L., & Hill, P. L. (2011). Purpose as a form of identity capital for positive youth adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1196–1206.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carver, C. S., & Connor-Smith, J. K. (2010). Personality and coping. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 679–704.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267–283.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1080–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conway, V. J., & Terry, D. J. (1992). Appraised controllability as a moderator of the effectiveness of different coping strategies: A test of the goodness of fit hypothesis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539208260155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E. (1996). Traits can be powerful, but are not enough: Lessons from subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 389–399.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ebata, A. T., & Moos, R. H. (1991). Coping and adjustment in distressed and healthy adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 12, 33–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(91)90029-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2014). The subjective happiness scale: Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a spanish version. Social Indicators Research, 119(1), 473–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0497-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fogle, L. M., Huebner, E. S., & Laughlin, J. E. (2002). The relationship between temprement and life satisfaciton in early adolescence: Cognitive and behavioral mediation models. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folkman, S. (1984). Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 839–852.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frydenberg, E. (2004). Coping competencies: What to teach and when. Theory Into Practice, 43(1), 14–22.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4301_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frydenberg, E. (2008). Adolescent coping: Advances in theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1994). Coping with different concerns: Consistency and variation in coping strategies used by adolescents. Australian Psychologist, 29(1), 45–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00050069408257320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (1996). A replication study of the structure of the adolescent coping scale: Multiple forms and applications of a self-report inventory in a counselling and research context. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 12, 224–235.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.12.3.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frydenberg, E., & Lewis, R. (2000). Teaching coping to adolescents: When and to whom? American Educational Research Journal, 37, 727–745.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037003727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9036-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffmann, J., Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (in press). Emotional intelligence in schools: A developmental perspective. In Springer handbook of emotional intelligence in education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the students’ life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 12, 231–240.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034391123010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale for children. Psychological Assessment, 6, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huebner, E. S. (2004). Research on assessment of life satisfaction of children and adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 66(2), 3–33.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000007497.57754.e3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2014). Predicting school success: Comparing conscientiousness, grit, and emotion regulation ability. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar
  32. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy. In L. A. Pervin, O. P. John, & R. W. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(97)81000-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jorm, A. F. (1989). Modifiability of trait anxiety and neuroticism: A meta-analysis of the literature. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23(1), 21–29.  https://doi.org/10.3109/00048678909062588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S., & Valois, R. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 249–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9517-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Little, B. R. (1996). Free traits, personal projects and idio-tapes: Three tiers for personality psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 7(4), 340–344.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0704_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151–173.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Little, B. R., & Joseph, M. F. (2007). Personal projects and free traits: Mutable selves and well beings. In B. R. Little, K. Salmela-Aro, & S. D. Phillips (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 375–400). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  39. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E. E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others? American Psychologist, 56, 239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lyubomirsky, S., & Tucker, K. L. K. (1998). Implications of individual differences in subjective happiness for perceiving, interpreting, and thinking about life events. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 155–186.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021396422190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacCann, C., Lipnevich, A. A., Burrus, J., & Roberts, R. D. (2012). The best years of our lives? Coping with stress predicts school grades, life satisfaction, and feelings about high school. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 235–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J., & Hau, K.-T. (1996). An Evaluation of Incremental Fit Indices: A clarification of Mathematical and Empirical Properties. In Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 315–353).Google Scholar
  47. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right–camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 257–284.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2006). Models of personality and affect for education : A review and synthesis. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 163–186). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five factor theory of personality. Handbook of personality: Theory and research.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)81000-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). MPlus [computer software]. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  53. Perera, H. N., & DiGiacomo, M. (2015). The role of trait emotional intelligence in academic performance during the university transition: An integrative model of mediation via social support, coping, and adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 208–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perera, H. N., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Profiles of teacher personality and relations with teacher self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Personality and individual differences, 120 (September 2017), 171–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Perera, H. N., McIlveen, P., & Oliver, M. E. (2015). The mediating roles of coping and adjustment in the relationship between personality and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 440–457.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Proctor, C., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009a). Youth life satisfaction measures: a review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(2), 128–144.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802650816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Proctor, C., Linley, P. A., & Maltby, J. (2009b). Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 583–630.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9110-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saha, R., Huebner, E. S., Hills, K. J., Malone, P. S., & Valois, R. F. (2014). Social coping and life satisfaction in adolescents. Social Indicators Research, 115(1), 241–252.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0217-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003). Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychological Bulletin, 129(2), 216–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRP.2008.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 718–737.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: big five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330–348.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Soto, C. J., & Tackett, J. L. (2015). Personality traits in childhood and adolescence: Structure, development, and outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(5), 358–362.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415589345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2004). Does life satisfaction moderate the effects of stressful life events on psychopathological behavior during adolescence? School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 93–105.  https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.19.2.93.33313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Suldo, S. M., Minch, D. R., & Hearon, B. V. (2015). Adolescent life satisfaction and personality characteristics: Investigating relationships using a five factor model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 965–983.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9544-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Suldo, S. M., Shaunessy, E., & Hardesty, R. (2008). Relationships among stress, coping, and mental health in high-achieving high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 273–290.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Suls, J., David, J. P., & Harvey, J. H. (1996). Personality and coping: three generations of research. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 711–735.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00942.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tkach, C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How do people pursue happiness? Relating personality, happiness-increasing strategies, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 183–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-4754-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Uusitalo-Malmivaara, L. (2012). Global and school-related happiness in finnish children. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(4), 601–619.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9282-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Valois, R. F., Zullig, K. J., Huebner, E. S., & Drane, J. W. (2001). Relationship between life satisfaction and violent behaviors among adolescents. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25, 353–366.  https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.25.4.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vela, J. C., Lerma, E., & Ikonomopoulos, J. (2017). Evaluation of the life satisfaction and subjective happiness scales with mexican american high school and college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 39(1), 34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986316681298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber, M., & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Early adolescents’ personality and life satisfaction: A closer look at global versus domain-specific satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Yale Center for Emotional IntelligenceYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations