Perceived responsibility for learning, self-efficacy, and sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: a study of international baccalaureate primary years programme students
- 572 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to assess the interrelationship of elementary students’ perceived responsibility for learning, self-efficacy, and sources of self-efficacy in mathematics, and differentiation as a function of gender and grade level. Participants in this study included 442 third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade students from U.S. International Baccalaureate schools. Self-report measures were used to assess key study variables. Students in grade five reported higher levels of mathematics self-efficacy and perceived responsibility for learning than those in grade three. Grade four students also reported higher levels of perceived responsibility than grade three students. In addition, regression results revealed that mastery experience, vicarious experience, social persuasion, and physiological state accounted for a significant amount of variance in students’ mathematics self-efficacy, with social persuasion being the strongest predictor. Educational implications for practice within the context of International Baccalaureate schools are discussed.
KeywordsSelf-regulation Self-efficacy Sources of self-efficacy Developmental and gender differences Mathematics Elementary students
- Alderman, M. K. (2008). Motivation for achievement: Possibilities for teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Bembenutty, H., Cleary, T. J., & Kitsantas, A. (Eds.). (2013). Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines: A tribute to Barry J. Zimmerman. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Borkowski, J. G., & Thorpe, P. K. (1994). Self-regulation and motivation: A lifetime perspective on underachievement. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 45–74). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- DiBenedetto, M. K., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2010). Differences in self-regulatory processes among students studying science: A microanalytic investigation. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5, 2–24.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., & Adler, T. F. (1984). Grade-related changes in the school environment: Effects on achievement motivation. In J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 283–331). Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Hampton, N. Z. (1998). Sources of academic self-efficacy scale: An assessment tool for rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 41, 260–277.Google Scholar
- International Baccalaureate Organization. (2005). 2003 United States student survey of high school seniors participating in the International Baccalaureate Program. Retrieved February 01, 2015 from the International Baccalaureate Organization, www.ibo.org/ibna/research/documents/2003StudentSurvey.US.pdf.
- International Baccalaureate Organization. (2018). Retrieved February 03, 2018 from http://www.ibo.org/.
- Kitsantas, A., Steen, S., & Huie, F. (2009). The role of self-regulated strategies and goal orientation in predicting achievement of elementary school children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 65–81.Google Scholar
- Lopez, F. G., & Lent, R. W. (1992). Sources of mathematics self-efficacy in high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 41, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1992.tb00350.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., et al. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In A. Gallagher & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294–315). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42, 104–120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171749.
- Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Self-perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
- Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs: Jointly contributing to the quality of human life. In H. Marsh, R. Craven, & D. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research (Vol. 2, pp. 95–121). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
- Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 13–44). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16–31). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Stevens, T., Olivarez, A., Jr., & Hamman, D. (2006). The role of cognition, motivation, and emotion in explaining the mathematics achievement gap between Hispanic and White students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28, 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986305286103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar