Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 585–602 | Cite as

Development and validation of the School Social Judgment Scale for children: Their judgment of the self to foster achievement at school

  • Bruno Chauvin
  • Elisabeth Demont
  • Odile Rohmer


Positive judgments on the Self are good predictors of academic achievement. It could be useful to benefit from an instrument able to assess how pupils elaborate self-judgments. So far, such a tool does not exist. The purpose of the present study was to develop a self-report measure of social judgment for children at school (the School Social Judgment Scale—SSJS). 660 pupils completed a questionnaire addressing 12 socio-academic behaviors. An exploratory factor analysis highlighted a four-factor structure of social judgment (Assertiveness, Competence, Effort and Agreeability). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) provided further support for this model, both in terms of factorial and construct validity. Reliability ranged from questionable to good depending on SSJS subscales. Multigroup CFA revealed invariance of the SSJS across gender and showed that boys had higher scores than girls for the assertiveness scale. Overall, the SSJS represents an efficient tool to better understand how social judgment for children works. As such, it could assist professionals of education to develop suitable educational support to assist poorly performing children at school.


Social judgment School Social Judgment Scale for children Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses Multigroup invariance Reliability 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimension of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2013). The big two in social judgment and behavior. Social Psychology, 44, 61–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakadorova, O., & Raufelder, D. (2015). Perception of teachers and peers during adolescence: Does school self-concept matter? Results of a qualitative study. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cislak, A. (2013). Effects of power and social perception. All your boss can see is agency. Social Psychology, 44, 138–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen-Laloum, J., Mollaret, P., & Darnon, C. (2017). Distinguishing the desire to learn from the desire to perform: The social value of achievement goals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corbières, M., Fraccaroli, F. F., Mbekou, V., & Perron, J. (2006). Academic self-concept and academic interest measurement: A multi-sample European study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cvencek, D., Fryberg, S.A., Covarrubias, R., & Meltzoff, A.N. (2017). Self-concepts, self-esteem, and academic achievement of minority and majority North American elementary school children. Child Development.
  16. D’Amico, A., & Cardaci, M. (2003). Relations among self-efficacy, self-esteem, and school achievement. Psychological Reports, 92, 745–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dompnier, B., & Pansu, P. (2010). Social value of causal explanations in educational settings: Pupils’ self-presentation and teachers’ representations [La valeur sociale des explications causales en contexte éducatif : auto-présentation des élèves et représentations des enseignants]. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2009). Faking the desire to learn: A clarification of the link between mastery goals and academic achievement. Psychological Science, 20, 939–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dompnier, B., Pansu, P., & Bressoux, P. (2007). Social utility, social desirability and scholastic judgments: Toward a personological model of academic evaluation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fiske, S. (2015). Intergroup biases: A focus on stereotype content. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frost, J., & Ottem, M. (2016). The value of assessing pupils’ academic self-concept. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research.
  25. Halim, M. L., Zosuls, K. M., Ruble, D. N., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Baeg, A. S., Walsh, A. S., et al. (2016). Children’s dynamic gender identities across development and the influence of cognition, context, and culture. In C. S. Tamis-LeMonda & L. Balter (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (3rd ed., pp. 193–218). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  26. Hascoët, M., Pansu, P., Bouffard, T., & Leroy, N. (2017). The harmful aspect of teacher conditional support on student’s self-perception of school competence. European Journal of Psychology of Education.
  27. Heyder, A., & Kessels, U. (2013). Is school feminine? Implicit gender stereotyping of school as a predictor of academic achievement. Sex Roles, 69, 605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hogan, R. (1982). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M. M. Page (Ed.), 1982 Nebraska symposium on motivation: Personality-current theory and research (pp. 55–89). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mollaret, P., & Miraucourt, D. (2016). Is job performance independent from career success? A conceptual distinction between competence and agency. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 57, 607–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  32. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Oldmeadow, J., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). System justifying ideologies moderate status = competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ommundsen, Y., Haugen, R., & Lund, T. (2005). Academic Self-concept, implicit theories of ability, and self-regulation strategies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Self-perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Pansu, P., & Dubois, N. (2013). The social origin of personality traits: An evaluative function. In E. F. Morris & M. A. Jackson (Eds.), Psychology of personnality (pp. 1–23). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Paulhus, D. L., & Trapnell, P. D. (2008). Self-presentation on personality scales: An agency-communion framework. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 493–517). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  38. Perrin, S., & Testé, B. (2010). Impact of the locus of causality and internal control on the social utility of causal explanations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piche, C., & Plante, C. (1991). Perceived masculinity, feminity and androgyny among primary school boys: Relationships with the adaptation level of these students and the attitudes of the teachers towards them. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 6, 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qureshi, A., Wall, H., Humphries, J., & Balani, A. B. (2016). Can personality traits modulate student engagement with learning and their attitude to employability? Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raines-Eudy, R. (2000). Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rohmer, O., & Louvet, E. (2013). Social utility and academic success of students with or without disability: The impact of competence and effort [Utilité sociale et réussite universitaire d’étudiants ayant ou non des incapacités motrices : rôles respectifs de la compétence et de l’effort]. Journal of Human Development, Disability, and Social Change, 21, 65–76.Google Scholar
  43. Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a Confirmatory Factor Analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholtens, S., Rydell, A. M., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2013). ADHD symptoms, academic achievement, self-perception of academic competence and future orientation: A longitudinal study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 3, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2009). How do motivational regulation strategies affect achievement: Mediated by effort management and moderated by intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smeding, A., Dompnier, B., Meier, E., & Darnon, C. (2015). The motivation to learn as a self-presentation tool among Swiss high school students: The moderating role of mastery goals’ perceived social value on learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 204–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soriano-Ferrer, M., & Morte-Soriano, M. (2017). Teacher perceptions of reading motivation in children with developmental dyslexia and average readers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Spinath, B., Eckert, C., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Gender differences in school success: What are the roles of students’ intelligence, personality and motivation? Educational Research, 56, 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Velicer, W., Peacock, A., & Jackson, D. (1982). A comparison of component and factor patterns: A Monte Carlo approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Verniers, C., Martinot, D., & Dompnier, B. (2016). The feminization of school hypothesis called into question among junior and high school students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wouters, S., Germeijs, V., Colpin, H., & Verschueren, K. (2011). Academic self-concept in high school: Predictors and effects on adjustment in higher education. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 586–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang, Y., & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In M. E. Sobel & M. P. Becker (Eds.), Sociological Methodology 2000 (pp. 165–200). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  54. Yzerbyt, V. (2016). Intergroup stereotyping. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ziegler, M., & Bensch, D. (2013). Lost in translation: Thoughts regarding the translation of existing psychological measures into other languages. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Psychology of CognitionsUniversity of StrasbourgStrasbourgFrance

Personalised recommendations