Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

‘Everyone has their own qualities’: tracking and academic self-appraisal in Flemish secondary education

Abstract

Track position has an impact on students’ perceptions of educational success. These perceptions matter as they relate to educational and professional aspirations and choices. In this ethnographic study, based on ethnographic observations and semi-structured interviews in three secondary schools in Flanders (northern part of Belgium), we want to increase our understanding of the combination of within- and between track comparisons for students’ perceptions of their educational success. The hierarchical nature of the Flemish educational system is reflected in students’ comparison groups to evaluate their school success. In academic tracks, most students considered their educational career automatically as successful, regardless of their actual grades. Conversely, students in vocational tracks developed more contradictory feelings with respect to their personal school success and felt the need to distinguish themselves from their classmates. Thus, regardless the existence of different school cultures across tracks, students searched for strategies to define themselves as successful in school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Boone, S., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). In search of the mechanisms conducive to class differentials in educational choice: A mixed method research. Sociological Review, 61(3), 549–572.

  2. Chmielewski, A. K., Dumont, H., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type. An international comparison of students’ mathematics self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 925–957. doi:10.3102/0002831213489843.

  3. Clycq, N., Nouwen, W., & Vandenbroucke, A. (2014). Meritocracy, deficit thinking and the invisibility of the system: Discourses on educational success and failure. British Educational Research Journal, 40(5), 796–819.

  4. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys—The culture of the gang. New York: The Free Press.

  5. Davis, J. A. (1959). A formal interpretation of the theory of relative deprivation. Sociometry, 22(4), 285–296.

  6. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. The American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 17–31.

  7. Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). Grade retention and its association with school misconduct in adolescence: A multilevel approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(4), 417–434.

  8. Ganzeboom, H., & Treiman, D. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification. Social Science Research, 25(3), 201–239.

  9. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

  10. Guimond, S., & Dambrun, M. (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: The effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 900–912.

  11. Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (2007). Secondary school pupils’ satisfaction with their ability grouping placements. British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 27–45.

  12. Hallinan, M. T. (1994). Tracking—From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.

  13. Hargreaves, D. H. (1967). Social relations in a secondary school. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  14. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (1999). Raising standards: Is ability grouping the answer? Oxford Review of Education, 25, 343–358.

  15. Lacey, C. (1970). Hightown grammar. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  16. Liem, G. A. D., Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., McInerney, D. M., & Yeung, A. S. (2013). The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 326–370.

  17. Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.

  18. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376.

  19. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Craven, R. (2004). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny. American Psychologist, 59(4), 269–271.

  20. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C.-K., & Hau, K.-T. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 337–349.

  21. Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 691–720.

  22. Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe: Free Press.

  23. Nouwen, W., & Clycq, N. (2016). The role of teacher-pupil relations in stereotype threat effects in Flemish secondary education. Urban Education. doi:10.1177/0042085916646627.

  24. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  25. Richer, S. (1976). Reference group theory and ability grouping: A convergence of sociological theory and educational research. Sociology of Education, 49(1), 65–71.

  26. Rosenbaum, J. E. (1976). Making inequality: The hidden curriculum of high school tracking. New York: Wiley.

  27. Rosenbaum, J. E., & Kariya, T. (1991). Do school achievements affect the early jobs of high school graduates in the United States and Japan? Sociology of Education, 64(2), 78–95.

  28. Shavelson, R., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.

  29. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., De Vinney, L. C., Leland, C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M. (1949). Studies in social psychology in World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  30. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole: Monterey, CA.

  31. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluaton maintenance model of social behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, 23–27 August

  32. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., & Nagy, G. (2009). Within-School social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 853–866.

  33. Van Houtte, M. (2005). Global self-esteem in technical/vocational versus general secondary school tracks: A matter of gender? Sex Roles, 53(9–10), 753–761.

  34. Van Houtte, M. (2006). School type and academic culture: Evidence for the differentiation–polarization theory. Curriculum Studies, 36(3), 273–292.

  35. Van Houtte, M., Demanet, J., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2012). Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference? Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 73–89.

  36. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2009). Study involvement of academic and vocational students: Does between-school tracking sharpen the difference? American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 943–973.

  37. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2010). The culture of futility and its impact on study culture in technical/vocational schools in Belgium. Oxford Review of Education, 36(1), 23–43.

  38. Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2015). Tracking and sense of futility: The impact of between-school tracking versus within-school tracking in secondary education in Flanders (Belgium). British Educational Research Journal, 41(5), 782–800.

  39. Van Praag, L., Boone, S., Stevens, P. A. J., & Van Houtte, M. (2015). De paradox van het watervalsysteem: Wanneer het groeperen van studenten in homogene groepen tot meer heterogeniteit leidt in het beroepsonderwijs. Sociologos, 36(2), 82–101.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Flanders Research Foundation (FWO) under Grant FWO09/ASP/098.

Author information

Correspondence to Lore Van Praag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Praag, L., Demanet, J., Stevens, P.A.J. et al. ‘Everyone has their own qualities’: tracking and academic self-appraisal in Flemish secondary education. Soc Psychol Educ 20, 601–618 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9371-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Secondary education
  • Tracking system
  • Belgium
  • Success