The social utility of performance-approach goals in a selective educational environment
- 230 Downloads
According to the recent research, the educational system fulfills both an educational function (i.e., teaching and training students) and a selection function (i.e., determining students’ future position in the social hierarchy), particularly in higher education. It has been argued that in the university system the selection function provides a social utility value to performance-approach goals (i.e., the goal to demonstrate one’s own competences relative to others), which in turn increases the extent to which students endorse these goals. Two experiments investigated the influence of the salience of the selection function on performance-approach goals’ social value and endorsement. The results showed that the salience of the selection function increased both performance-approach goal endorsement (experiment 1 and 2) and performance-approach goals’ social utility (experiment 2). These goals’ social utility contributes to explaining the effect of the salience of the selection function on performance-approach goal endorsement. Limitations of the present experiments and practical implications are discussed.
KeywordsMotivation Achievement goals Selection Higher education Social value
This research was supported by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR 11 INEG 002 02), the Swiss National Science Foundation (SINERGIA), and the Région Auvergne.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C., & Nice, R. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2005). Buts d’accomplissement, stratégies d’étude, et motivation intrinsèque : présentation d’un domaine de recherche et validation française de l’échelle d’Elliot et McGregor (2001) [Achievement goals, study strategies, and intrinsic motivation: Presenting a domain of research and the French validation of Elliot and McGregor’s (2001) scale]. L’année Psychologique, 105(1), 105–131. doi: 10.3406/psy.2005.3821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dompnier, B., Darnon, C., Delmas, F., & Butera, F. (2008). Achievement goals and social judgment: The performance-approach goals paradox. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 21(1), 247–271.Google Scholar
- Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648. doi: 10.1037/a0023952.
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316–330. doi: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moller, A. C., & Elliot, A. J. (2006). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In A. V. Mittel (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 307–326). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Nichols, W. D., Jones, J. P., & Hancock, D. R. (2003). Teachers’ influence on goal orientation: Exploring the relationship between eighth graders’ goal orientation, their emotional development, their perceptions of learning, and their teachers’ instructional strategies. Reading Psychology, 24(1), 57–85. doi: 10.1080/02702710308236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pope, D. C. (2001). Doing school: How we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research (pp. 13–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2013). School goal structure: Associations with students’ perceptions of their teachers as emotionally supportive, academic self-concept, intrinsic motivation, effort, and help seeking behavior. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sommet, N., Darnon, C., Mugny, G., Quiamzade, A., Pulfrey, C., Dompnier, B., et al. (2014). Performance goals in conflictual social interactions: Towards the distinction between two modes of relational conflict regulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(1), 134–153. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar