Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 729–748 | Cite as

Academic self-regulation as a function of age: the mediating role of autonomy support and differentiation in school

  • Daniela MartinekEmail author
  • Franz Hofmann
  • Ulrike Kipman
Article

Abstract

Numerous studies in the tradition of the self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan in Can Psychol 49(1):14–23, 2008) point out the significance of self-determined academic motivation and its relevance for learning processes and well-being. Whereas these results sketch a rather heterogeneous picture of the development of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, only a limited amount of research results are dedicated to the development of academic self-regulation. This cross-sectional research is based on the data of 432 pupils aged 6–20 from primary to secondary school. With the aid of questionnaires, participants provided information concerning their academic self-regulation and how much autonomy support and differentiation they perceive in school. The results of cluster analysis and structural equation modelling indicated that age is negatively related to academic self-regulation, while intrinsic and (rather) controlled regulation decreased the older the pupils are. The values for rather self-determined regulation remained comparatively stable. In addition, the longer pupils attended school, the less they reported perceived autonomy support and differentiation. Perceived autonomy support had an impact on intrinsic and rather self-determined regulation but not on controlled regulation, whereas perceived differentiation was not related to academic self-regulation. These findings offer novel explanations why settings in schools—especially in secondary schools—can become less suitable for learners (Eccles and Roeser in Handbook of adolescent psychology, Wiley, Hoboken, pp 404–434, 2009) and how they can assist educators in designing autonomous learning environments that contribute to maintaining and developing intrinsic and self-determined academic regulation strategies.

Keywords

Self-determination Autonomous learning environments Pupils’ motivation 

References

  1. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BIFIE (2010). PISA 2009: Fragebögen (PISA 2009: Questionnaires). https://www.bifie.at/node/276 on February 20, 2014.
  5. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boggiano, A. K., Flink, C., Shields, A., Seelbach, A., & Barrett, M. (1993). Use of techniques promoting students’ self-determination: Effects on students’ analytic problem-solving skills. Motivation and Emotion, 17(4), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boggiano, A. K., Main, D. S., & Katz, P. A. (1988). Children’s preference for challenge: The role of perceived competence and control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corpus, J. H., McClintic-Gilbert, M. S., & Hayenga, A. O. (2009). Within-year changes in children’s intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Contextual predictors and academic outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(2), 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale. Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(1), 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Levels of analysis, regnant causes of behavior and well-being: The role of psychological needs. Psychological Inquiry, 22(1), 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation. Oxford library of psychology (pp. 85–107). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2014). Perceived autonomy support. The Learning Climate Questionnaire (LCQ). http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/pas-learning-climate/ on January 20, 2014.
  17. Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(5), 642–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. D. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 404–434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Eder, F. (2012). Die beruflichen Interessen der 15- und 16-Jährigen (Occupational interests of 15- to 16 year olds). In F. Eder (Ed.), PISA 2009—nationale Zusatzanalysen für Österreich (PISA2009—additional national analyses for Austria) (pp. 257–284). Münster, New York, NY, München, Berlin: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  20. Eder, F., Neuweg, G. H., & Thonhauser, J. (2009). Leistungsfeststellung und Leistungsbeurteilung. (Ascertainment and evaluation of achievment). In W. Specht (Ed.), Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2009. Fokussierte Analysen bildungspolitischer Schwerpunktthemen (National education report Austria 2009. Focused analyses of educational policy core topics) (pp. 247–267). Graz: Leykam.Google Scholar
  21. Fend, H. (2008). Schule gestalten. Systemsteuerung, Schulentwicklung und Unterrichtsqualität (Designing school. System control, school development and lesson quality. Lehrbuch) (1st ed.). Wiesbaden: VS, Verl. für Sozialwiss.Google Scholar
  22. Fischer, N., & Rustemeyer, R. (2007). Motivationsentwicklung und schülerperzipiertes Lehrkraftverhalten im Mathematikunterricht (Motivational development and pupils’ perceptions of teaching behaviour in mathematics). Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flink, C., Boggiano, A. K., & Barrett, M. (1990). Controlling teaching strategies: Undermining children’s self-determination and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 916–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(3), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M.-A. K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: the mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grolnick, W. S., Farkas, M. S., Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after-school program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 890–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 233–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guay, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1996). Social context, student’s motivation, and academic achievement: Toward a process model. Social Psychology of Education, 1(3), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harter, S., Whitesell, N. R., & Kowalski, P. (1992). Individual differences in the effects of educational transitions on young adolescent’s perceptions of competence and motivational orientation. American Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Heikkilä, A., & Lonka, K. (2006). Studying in higher education: students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hofmann, F. (2014). Selbststeuerungsfähigkeiten Frühadoleszenter und deren Förderung im Unterricht (Self-regulation competences of young adolescents and how to support these in class). In C. Solzbacher, M. Lotze, & M. Sauerhering (Eds.), Selbst-Lernen-Können. Selbstkompetenzförderung in Theorie und Praxis (Self-Learning-Knowledge. Self-competence training in theory and practice) (pp. 125–136). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.Google Scholar
  37. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73(2), 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities. It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janssen, J., & Laatz, W. (2010). Statistische Datenanalyse mit SPSS. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in das Basissystem und das Modul Exakte Tests; (Zusatzmaterial online) [Statistical analyses with SPSS. A user-oriented introduction to the basic system and a module exact tests (additional material online)], 7th edn. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Methodology in the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kuhl, J. (2010). Lehrbuch der Persönlichkeitspsychologie. Motivation, Emotion und Selbststeuerung (Educational book on psychology of personality. Motivation, emotion and self-regulation). Lehrbuch, Göttingen, Bern, Wien, Paris, Oxford, Prag, Toronto, Cambridge, Mass., Amsterdam, Kopenhagen, Stockholm: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  43. Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levesque, C., Zuehlke, A. N., Stanek, L. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and American university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martinek, D. (2014). Selbstbestimmt lehren und lernen. Lehrer/innen zwischen Autonomie und beruflichem Druck (Self-determined teaching and learning. Teachers between autonomy and occupational pressure). Schriften zur pädagogischen Psychologie (Vol. 61). Hamburg: Kovac.Google Scholar
  46. Mayr, J., & Müller, F. H., Sturm, T. (2010). Skalenbericht zum Themenbereich Differenzierung und Individualisierung (Scale documentation concerning differentiation and individualization). https://www.bifie.at/buch/1293/4/10 on February 03, 2014.
  47. McCombs, B. L., & Miller, L. (2007). Learner-centered classroom practices and assessments. Maximizing student motivation, learning, and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  48. Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Müller, F. H., Hanfstingl, B., & Andreitz, I. (2007). Skalen zur motivationalen Regulation beim Lernen von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Adaptierte und ergänzte Versionen des Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) nach Ryan & Connell Connell (Scales for motivational learning regulation of pupils. Adapted and completed version of the Academic self-regulation questionnaire (SRQ-A) by Ryan & Connell). Alpen-Adria Universität Klagenfurt. https://ius.uni-klu.ac.at/publikationen/wiss_beitraege/dateien/IUS_Forschungsbericht_1_Motivationsskalen.pdf on February 03, 2014.
  50. Oerter, R., & Dreher, E. (2008). Jugendalter (Adolescence). In R. Oerter (Ed.), Entwicklungspsychologie. Lehrbuch (Developmental psychology. Educational book) (pp. 271–332). Weinheim, Basel: Beltz, PVU.Google Scholar
  51. Ommundsen, Y., & Kval⊘, S. E. (2007). Autonomy-mastery, supportive or performance focused? Different teacher behaviours and pupils’ outcomes in physical education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(4), 385–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Otis, N., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patrick, B. C., Skinner, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1993). What motivates children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 781–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ratelle, C. F., & Duchesne, S. (2014). Trajectories of psychological need satisfaction from early to late adolescence as a predictor of adjustment in school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  58. Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as Facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 537–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rheinberg, F. (2002). Bezugsnormen und Leistungsbeurteilung (Reference norms and achievement evaluation). In F. E. Weinert (Ed.), Leistungsmessungen in Schulen (Measuring achievement in schools). Beltz Pädagogik (pp. 59–71). Weinheim [u.a.]: Beltz-Verl.Google Scholar
  63. Ruble, D. N., & Flett, G. L. (1988). Conflicting goals in self-evaluative information seeking. Developmental and ability level analyses. Child Development, 59(1), 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectic perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  66. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Towards a social psychology of assimilation: Self-determination theory in cognitive development and education. In B. W. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet & U. Müller (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy. Social and developmental dimensions of human conduct. Jean Piaget symposium series (Vol. 40, pp. 191–207). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 550–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stornes, T., Bru, E., & Idsoe, T. (2008). Classroom social structure and motivational climates: On the influence of teachers’ involvement, teachers’ autonomy support and regulation in relation to motivational climates in school classrooms. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(3), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom. Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  70. Trouilloud, D., Sarrazin, P., Bressoux, P., & Bois, J. (2006). Relation between teachers’ early expectations and students’ later perceived competence in physical education classes: Autonomy-supportive climate as a moderator. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Velki, T. (2011). The correlation considering the degree of autonomous motivation, academic achievement and mental health. Croatian Journal of Education, 13(3), 56–87.Google Scholar
  75. Waterman, S. S. (2005). Handbook on differentiated instruction for middle and high schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.Google Scholar
  76. Watt, Helen M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75(5), 1556–1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 767–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Martinek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Franz Hofmann
    • 1
  • Ulrike Kipman
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Education/Educational SciencesUniversity of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Pädagogische Hochschule Stefan Zweig, College of EducationSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations