Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 325–343 | Cite as

Expectancy of success, subjective task-value, and message frame in the appraisal of value-promoting messages made prior to a high-stakes examination

  • David W. PutwainEmail author
  • Wendy Symes
Article

Abstract

Previous research has examined how subjective task-value and expectancy of success influence the appraisal of value-promoting messages used by teachers prior to high-stakes examinations. The aim of this study was to examine whether message-frame (gain or loss-framed messages) also influences the appraisal of value-promoting messages. Two hundred and fifty-two participants in Years 12 and 13 read vignettes of fictional students who were high or low in subjective-task value, and expectancy of success, and asked to imagine how that student would appraise either a gain or loss-framed message. A challenge appraisal followed vignettes with high subjective task-value and high expectancy of success whereas a threat appraisal followed vignettes with high subjective task-value and low expectancy of success. A loss-framed message resulted in a stronger threat appraisal, and a gain-framed message in a greater disregarding appraisal for the vignette with high subjective task-value and high expectancy of success. Value-promoting messages can be appraised in different ways depending on combinations of intrapersonal (subjective task-value and expectancy of success) and interpersonal (message-frame) influences.

Keywords

Value-promoting messages Fear appeals Subjective task-value Expectancy of success Message-frame 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anya Zarod, Alistair Burr and Hannah Wilkinson for their help in data collection.

References

  1. Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and enjoyment. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Handbook of emotions in education (pp. 205–227). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Barter, C., & Renold, E. (2000). ‘I wanna tell you a story’: Exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(4), 307–323. doi: 10.1080/13645570050178594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Connly, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: Combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 32–47. doi: 10.1037/a0026042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eccles, J. S., O’Neill, S. A., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task-values in adolescents and children. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 239–247). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Folkman, S. (2008). The case for positive emotions in the stress process. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 21(1), 4–14. doi: 10.1080/10615800701740457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Folkman, S. (2011). Stress, health, and coping: Synthesis, commentary, and future directions. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 453–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9446-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., et al. (2014). “My Questionnaire is Too Long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huck, S. W., Cormier, W. H., & Bounds, W. G. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  13. Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398–416. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Stress and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Maloney, E. K., Lapinksi, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(4), 206–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCarthy, P. J. (2011). Positive emotion in sport performance: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(1), 50–69. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2011.560955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meijen, C., Jones, M. C., McCarthy, P. J., Sheffield, D., & Allen, M. S. (2013). Cognitive and affective components of challenge and threat states. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(8), 847–855. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.753157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moreton, T. A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., & Bretschneider, P. (2011). The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 105–125. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Dell, L., Crafter, S., deAbreu, G., & Cline, T. (2013). The problem of interpretation in vignette methodology with young people. Qualitative Research, 12(6), 702–714. doi: 10.1177/1468794112439003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 17(3), 287–316. doi: 10.1080/10615800412331303847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., & Allen, M. (2006). Test anxiety. Academic self-efficacy and study skills: A meta-analytic review. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom interaction and instructional processes: A meta-analytic review (pp. 99–111). Maywah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  25. Putwain, D. W. (2009). Assessment and examination stress in Key Stage 4. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 391–411. doi: 10.1080/01411920802044404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2011). Fear appeals in the primary classroom: Effects on test anxiety and test grade. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 580–584. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Putwain, D. W., & Best, N. (2012). Do highly test anxious pupils respond differentially to fear appeals made prior to a test? Research in Education, 88(2), 1–10. doi: 10.7227/RIE.88.1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Putwain, D. W., Connors, E., Woods, K. A., & Nicholson, L. J. (2012). Stress and anxiety surrounding the Key Stage 2 Standard Assessment Tests in English schoolchildren. Pastoral Care in Education, 30(4), 189–302. doi: 10.1080/02643944.2012.688063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Putwain, D. W., Nicholson, L. J., Nakhla, G., Reece, M., Porter, B., & Liversidge, A. (2016). Fear appeals prior to a high-stakes examination can have a positive or negative impact on engagement depending on how the message is appraised. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44–45, 21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Putwain, D. W., & Remedios, R. (2014a). Fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes examination: What makes them threatening? Learning and Individual Differences, 36(1), 145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Putwain, D. W., & Remedios, R. (2014b). The scare tactic: Messages which contain fear appeals prior to a high-stakes test predict lower self-determined motivation and exam scores. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 503–516. doi: 10.1037/spq0000048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Putwain, D. W., Remedios, R., & Symes, W. (2014). The appraisal of fear appeals as threatening or challenging: Frequency of use, academic self-efficacy and subjective value. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology,. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.963028.Google Scholar
  33. Putwain, D. W., Remedios, R., & Symes, W. (2015). Fear appeals used prior high-stakes examinations: Why are they appraised as threatening and do they impact on subjective task-value? Learning and Instruction, 40(1), 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Putwain, D. W., & Roberts, C. M. (2009). The development and validation of the Teachers Use of Fear Appeals Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 643–661. doi: 10.1348/000709909X426130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Putwain, D. W., & Roberts, C. M. (2012). Fear and efficacy appeals in the classroom: the secondary teachers’ perspective. Educational Psychology, 32(3), 355–372. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2012.659845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2011a). Classroom fear appeals and examination performance: Facilitating or debilitating outcomes? Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2011b). Teachers’ use of fear appeals in the Mathematics classroom: Worrying or motivating students? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 456–474. doi: 10.1348/2044-8279.002005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2012). Are low competence beliefs always associated with high test anxiety? The mediating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 207–224. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02021.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2014). Subjective value and academic self-efficacy: The appraisal of fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes test as threatening or challenging. Social Psychology of Education, 17(2), 229–248. doi: 10.1007/s11218-014-9249-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roseman, I. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5(2), 141–149. doi: 10.1177/1754073912469591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J., & Rothman, A. J. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20(4), 256–266. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavioural inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34(3), 433–467. doi: 10.1177/0093650207302787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shiota, M. N., Neufeld, W. H., Yeung, W. H., Moser, S. E., & Perea, E. F. (2011). Feeling good: Autonomic system responding in five positive emotions. Emotion, 11(6), 1369–1378. doi: 10.1037/a0024278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sprinkle, R., Hunt, S., Simonds, C., & Comadena, M. (2006). Fear in the classroom: An examination of teachers’ use of fear appeals and students learning outcomes. Communication Education, 55(4), 389–402. doi: 10.1080/03634520600879170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., Cabdel, M. J. J. M., & De Vries, H. (2010a). Distinct pathways to persuasion: The role of affect in message-framing effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1261–1276. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., & De Vries, H. (2008). The influence of self-efficacy on the effects of framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 800–809. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., & De Vries, H. (2010b). Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin cancer detection. Psychology and Health, 25(3), 339–349. doi: 10.1080/08870440802530798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Werrij, M. Q., Ruiter, R. A., Van’t Riet, J., & De Vries, H. (2010). Self-efficacy as a potential moderator of the effects of framed health messages. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 199–207. doi: 10.1177/1359105310374779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Academic self-efficacy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. L. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In A. Wigfield & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 55–77). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationEdge Hill UniversityOrmskirk, LancashireUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations