The Pivotal Role of Effort Beliefs in Mediating Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Achievement Goals and Academic Motivations
Empirical studies into meaning systems surrounding implicit theories of intelligence typically entail two stringent assumptions: that different implicit theories and different effort beliefs represent opposite poles on a single scale, and that implicit theories directly impact the constructs as achievement goals and academic motivations. Through an empirical study based on a large sample of university students, we aim to demonstrate that relaxing these stringent assumptions, and thereby using the meaning system framework to its full potential, will provide strong benefits: effort beliefs are crucial mediators of relationships between implicit theories and achievement goals and academic motivations, and the different poles of implicit theories and effort beliefs do expose different relationships with goal setting behaviour and academic motivations. A structural equation model, cross-validated by demonstrating gender-invariance of path coefficients, demonstrates that incremental and entity theory views have less predictive power than positive and negative effort beliefs in explaining achievement goals and motivations.
KeywordsSelf-theories Implicit theories Effort beliefs Achievement goals Academic motivations Structural equation model
- Blackwell, L. S. (2002). Psychological mediators of student achievement during the transition to junior high school: The role of implicit theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
- Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2012, August 6). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin. doi:10.1037/a0029531.
- Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2008). Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 31–51). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122–140). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Dweck, C. S., & Sorich, L. (1999). Mastery-oriented thinking. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Coping (pp. 232–251). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2010). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi:10.1037/a0018947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Tyson, D. F., & Patall, E. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 19–70.Google Scholar
- Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2000). Meaning and motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sideridis, G., Vansteenkiste, M., Shiakalli, M., Georgiou, M., et al. (2009). Goal priming and the emotional experience of students with and without attention problems: An application of the emotional stroop task. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 177–189. doi:10.1177/0022219408331034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar