Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 617–636 | Cite as

How immigrant students’ self-views at school relate to different patterns of first and second language use

  • Ute GabrielEmail author
  • Nanine Lilla
  • Lysann Zander
  • Bettina Hannover
Article

Abstract

This research investigates how students from immigrant families whose first language differs from the language of instruction at school view themselves while at school, depending on the way in which they use their first and second language. While some immigrant students are inclined to predominantly use their first language in the home environment but their second language while at school (separate language use pattern, S-LUP), others use their first and second language across social settings (fused language use pattern, F-LUP). We expected self-views of immigrant students with S-LUP to more strongly depend on the immediate (language) context than self-views of F-LUP students. We content-analysed open self-descriptions which 569 adolescents with different first languages had provided in their second language, the language of instruction at school, while at school. As expected, compared to F-LUP students, S-LUP students’ self-views contained more school-related descriptions, i.e., more self-descriptions bound to the immediate language context, but fewer homerelated descriptions, i.e., fewer self-aspects bound to a first language context. Implications for language policies and educational practices in culturally heterogeneous schools are discussed.

Keywords

First and second language Immigrant students School-related self-views 

References

  1. Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 207–245. doi: 10.3102/0034654310368803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 680–740). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Benet-Martínez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M. W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 492–516. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033005005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(01), 3. doi: 10.1017/S1366728908003477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boos-Nünning, U., & Karakasoglu, Y. (2005). Viele Welten leben: Zur Lebenssituation von Mädchen und jungen Frauen mit Migrationshintergrund [Living many worlds: On the situation of migrant girls and young women]. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, S. X., & Bond, M. H. (2007). Explaining language priming effects: Further evidence for ethnic affirmation among Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(4), 398–406. doi: 10.1177/0261927X07306984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, S. X., & Bond, M. H. (2010). Two languages, two personalities? Examining language effects on the expression of personality in a bilingual context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1514–1528. doi: 10.1177/0146167210385360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 124–131. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fivush, R., & Nelson, K. (2004). Culture and language in the emergence of autobiographical memory. Psychological Science, 15(9), 573–577. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00722.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gebhardt, M., Rauch, D., Mang, J., Sälzer, C., & Stanat, P. (2013). Mathematische Kompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit Zuwanderungshintergrund [Mathematic competence of students from immigrant families]. In M. Prenzel, C. Sälzer, E. Klieme, & O. Köller (Eds.), PISA 2012: Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland [PISA 2012: Improvements and challenges in Germany] (pp. 275–308). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  12. Grabner, R. H., Saalbach, H., & Eckstein, D. (2012). Language-switching costs in bilingual mathematics learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(3), 147–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2012.01150.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hannover, B., Morf, C., Neuhaus, J., Rau, M., Wolfgramm, C., & Zander-Musić, L. (2013). How immigrant adolescents’ self-views in school and family context relate to academic success in Germany. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 175–189.Google Scholar
  14. Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2001). “Who am I?” The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 90–103. doi: 10.1177/0146167201271008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kempert, S., Saalbach, H., & Hardy, I. (2011). Cognitive benefits and costs of bilingualism in elementary school students: The case of mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 547–561. doi: 10.1037/a0023619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kessels, U., & Hannover, B. (2008). When being a girl matters less: Accessibility of gender-related self-knowledge in single-sex and coeducational classes and its impact on students’ physics-related self-concept of ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 273–289. doi: 10.1348/000709907X215938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kieffer, M. J. (2008). Catching up or falling behind? Initial English proficiency, concentrated poverty, and the reading growth of language minority learners in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 851–868. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.4.851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koven, M. (2007). Selves in two languages: Bilinguals’ verbal enactments of identity in French and Portuguese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19, 68–76. doi: 10.2307/2088175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marian, V., & Neisser, U. (2000). Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 361–368. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nario-Redmond, M. R., Biernat, M., Eidelman, S., & Palenske, D. J. (2004). The social and personal identities scale: A measure of the differential importance ascribed to social and personal self-categorizations. Self and Identity, 3(2), 143–175. doi: 10.1080/13576500342000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, K., & Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review, 111(2), 486–511. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2002). Sample tasks from the PISA 2000 Assessment: Reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Retrieved from http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/free/9602011e.pdf.
  24. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2010). Results from PISA 2009: Overcoming social background. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/24/0,3746,en_32252351_46584327_46609752_1_1_1_1,00.html.
  25. Ogbu, J. (2004). Collective identity and the burden of ’acting White’ in Black history, community, and education. Urban Review, 36, 1–35. doi: 10.1023/B:URRE.0000042734.83194.f6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Terry, K. (2003). Gendered racial identity and involvement with school. Self and Identity, 2, 307–324. doi: 10.1080/714050250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pavlenko, A. (2006). Bilingual minds: Emotional experience, expression and representation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  28. Ross, M., Xun, W. Q. E., & Wilson, A. E. (2002). Language and the bicultural self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1040–1050. doi: 10.1177/01461672022811003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruble, D. N., Alvarez, J., Bachman, M., Cameron, J., Fuligni, A., & Garcia Coll, C. (2004). The development of a sense of “we”: The emergence and implications of children’s collective identity. In M. Bennett & F. Sani (Eds.), The development of the social self (pp. 29–76). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  30. Saalbach, H., Eckstein, D., Andri, N., Hobi, R., & Grabner, R. H. (2013). When language of instruction and language of application differ: Cognitive costs of bilingual mathematics learning. Learning and Instruction, 26, 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schrauf, R. W., & Durazo-Arvizu, R. (2006). Bilingual autobiographical memory and emotion: Theory and methods. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Bilingual minds: Emotional experience, expression and representation (pp. 284–311). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  32. Stanat, P., & Christensen, G. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  33. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trafimow, D., Silverman, E. S., Fan, R. M.-T., & Law, J. S. F. (1997). The effects of language and priming on the relative accessibility of the private self and the collective self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(1), 107–123. doi: 10.1177/0022022197281007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trafimow, D., Triandis, H., & Goto, S. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private and the public self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 649–655. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verkuyten, M., & Pouliasi, K. (2002). Biculturalism among older children: Cultural frame switching, attributions, self-identification, and attitudes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(6), 596–609. doi: 10.1177/0022022102238271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, Q., Shao, Y., & Li, Y. J. (2010). “My way or mom’s way?” The bilingual and bicultural self in Hong Kong Chinese children and adolescents. Child Development, 81(2), 555–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01415.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zou, X., Morris, M. W., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2008). Identity motives and cultural priming: Cultural (dis)identification in assimilative and contrastive responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1151–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ute Gabriel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nanine Lilla
    • 2
  • Lysann Zander
    • 2
  • Bettina Hannover
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations