Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 589–607 | Cite as

Stereotype activation versus application: how teachers process and judge information about students from ethnic minorities and with low socioeconomic background

  • Sabine Glock
  • Sabine Krolak-Schwerdt
Article

Abstract

Teachers develop stereotypical expectations about students, but this categorical knowledge can influence their judgments about students. Although teachers’ stereotypical expectations about students have been investigated in the educational domain, this research has mostly measured only the teachers’ judgments. However, the judgment is only the outcome of preceding information processing, which consists of different stages that might be influenced by social categories. Drawing on dual process theories of impression and judgment formation, we investigated teachers’ information processing and judgment processes. In Study 1, we compared the processing of neutral information and information about a racial minority student. In Study 2, we investigated how teachers derive judgments of students from families with high versus low socioeconomic backgrounds. Both studies revealed that perception and memory were affected by social categories but showed no impact of categorical information on teachers’ judgments. Thus, the results indicated stereotype activation but not application, as teachers seemed to suppress their stereotypical expectations when it comes to the judgment. The implications of the results for future research as well as for teacher training are discussed.

Keywords

Achievement judgments Racial minorities SES Stereotypes 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests.

References

  1. Alvidrez, J., & Weinstein, R. (1999). Early teacher perceptions and later student academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 731–746. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.91.4.731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansalone, G., & Biafora, F. (2004). Elementary school teachers’ perceptions and attitudes to the educational structure of tracking. Education, 125, 249–260.Google Scholar
  3. Auwarter, A. E., & Aruguete, M. S. (2008). Effects of student gender and socioeconomic status on teacher perceptions. The Journal of Educational Research, 101, 243–246. doi: 10.3200/JOER.101.4.243-246.
  4. Babad, E. Y., Inbar, J., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 459–474. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin, M. W., Fehr, B., Keedian, E., Seidel, M., & Thomson, D. W. (1993). An exploration of the relational schemata underlying attachment styles: Self-report and lexical decision approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 746–754. doi: 10.1177/0146167293196010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (pp. 1–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 168–179. doi: 10.1037/a0017289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonvin, P. (2003). The role of teacher attitudes and judgment in decision-making: The case of grade retention. European Educational Research Journal, 2, 277. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2003.2.2.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. N. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition, 7, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, D. F., & Sue, S. (2003). The effects of race and problem type on teachers’ assessments of student behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 235–242. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.2.235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, D. F., & Demyan, A. L. (2007). Teachers’ stereotypes of Asian, Black, and White students. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 91–114. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.2.91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dee, T. S. (2005). A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter? The American Economic Review, 95, 158–165. doi: 10.1257/000282805774670446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Destatis. (2011). Ein Fünftel der Bevölkerung in Deutschland hatte 2010 einen Migrationshintergrund [In 2010, a fifth of the German population had an immigration background]. Retrieved October 29, 2012, from https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2011/09/PD11_355_122.html?nn=50730.
  15. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diamond, J. B., Randolph, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). Teachers’ expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35, 75–98. doi: 10.1525/aeq.2004.35.1.75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elhoweris, H., Mutua, K., Alsheikh, N., & Holloway, P. (2005). Effect of children’s ethnicity on teachers’ referral and recommendation decisions in gifted and talented programs. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 25–31. doi: 10.1177/07419325050260010401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elhoweris, H. (2008). Teacher judgment in identifying gifted/talented students. Multicultural Education, 15, 35–38.Google Scholar
  20. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 115–141. doi: 10.1080/0269993004200024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P., & Plessner, H. (2002). Judgment biases in a simulated classroom–a cognitive-environmental approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 527–561. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2001.2981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model. Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Freitag, M., & Schlicht, R. (2009). Educational federalism in Germany: Foundations of social inequality in education. Governance, 22, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey, A. (2002). Predictors of placement recommendations for children with behavioral or emotional disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 126–136.Google Scholar
  28. Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., Mbirkou, S., Seibt, B., & Strack, F. (2008). When “Just Say No” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 370–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Klapproth, F., & Böhmer, M. (2013). Beyond judgment bias: How students’ ethnicity and academic profile consistency influence teachers’ tracking judgments. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 555–573. doi: 10.1007/s11218-013-9227-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gordijn, E. H., Hindriks, I., Koomen, W., Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Consequences of stereotype suppression and internal suppression motivation: A self-regulation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 212–224. doi: 10.1177/0146167203259935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guskin, S. L., Peng, C.-Y. J., & Simon, M. (1992). Do teachers react to “Multiple Intelligences”? Effects of teachers’ stereotypes on judgments and expectancies for students with diverse patterns of giftedness/talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 32–37. doi: 10.1177/001698629203600108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haberlandt, K. (1994). Methods in reading research. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1–31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Haller, E. J., & Davis, S. A. (1980). Does socioeconomic status bias the assignment of elementary school students to reading groups? American Educational Research Journal, 17, 409–418. doi: 10.3102/00028312017004409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Haller, E. J., & Davis, S. A. (1981). Teacher perceptions, parental social status and grouping for reading instruction. Sociology of Education, 54, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Haller, E. J. (1985). Pupil race and elementary school ability grouping: Are teachers biased against Black children? American Educational Research Journal, 22, 465–483. doi: 10.3102/00028312022004465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harvey, D. G., & Slatin, G. T. (1975). The relationship between child’s SES and teacher expectations: A test of the middle-class bias hypothesis. Social Forces, 54, 140–159. doi: 10.1093/sf/54.1.140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.2.197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. De Houwer, J. (2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them? In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publisher.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jussim, L. (1989). Teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 469–480. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karing, C., Matthäi, J., & Artelt, C. (2011). Genauigkeit von Lehrerurteilen über die Lesekompetenz ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler in der Sekundarstufe I - Eine Frage der Spezifität? [Lower secondary school teacher judgment accuracy of students’ reading competence - A matter of specifity?]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 159–172. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871–888. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. KMK—Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. (2010). Übergang von der Grundschule in Schulen des Sekundarbereichs I und Förderung, Beobachtung und Orientierung in den Jahrgangsstufen 5 und 6 (sog. Orientierungsstufe) [Transition from primary to secondary schools and advancement, observation, and orientation. Retrieved August 23, 2011, from http://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/2010/2010_10_18-Uebergang-Grundschule-S_eI1-Orientierungsstufe.pdf.
  45. Kristen, C., & Granato, N. (2007). The educational attainment of the second generation in Germany: Social origins and ethnic inequality. Ethnicities, 7, 343–366. doi: 10.1177/1468796807080233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Kneer, J. (2006). Lesezeiten- und Blickbewegungsverfahren als Methode für die soziale Kognitionsforschung [Reading time and eye movement methods to study the processing of social information]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Rummer, R. (2005). Der Einfluss von Expertise auf den Prozess der schulischen Leistungsbeurteilung [The influence of expertise on the process of judging academic achievement]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 37, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2013). The impact of accountability on teachers’ assessments of student performance: A social cognitive analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 215–239. doi: 10.1007/s11218-013-9215-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Junker, N., Roth, R., & Wintermantel, M. (2008). Processing person descriptions: How does text coherence influence encoding and retrieval of person information? Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 235–253. doi: 10.1177/0261927X08318018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kunda, Z., & Spencer, S. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522–544. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kunda, Z., Davies, P. G., Adams, B. D., & Spencer, S. J. (2002). The dynamic time course of stereotype activation: Activation, dissipation, and resurrection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 283–299. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Langer, A., Langer, H., & Theimer, H. (1993). Lehrer beobachten und beurteilen Schüler [Teachers observe and assess students]. München, Germany: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  53. Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Milne, A. B. (1998). Saying no to unwanted thoughts: Self-focus and the regulation of mental life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 578–589. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808–817. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.67.5.808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37–47. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marx, S. (2003). Entanglements of altruism, whiteness, and deficit thinking. Education for Urban Minorities, 2, 41–46.Google Scholar
  58. McCombs, R. C., & Gay, J. (1988). Effects of race, class, and IQ information on judgments of parochial grade school teachers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 647–652. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1988.9922918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Monteith, M. J., Sherman, J. W., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Suppression as a stereotype control strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 63–82. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neal, L. V., McCay, A. D., Webb-Johnson, G., & Bridget, S. T. (2003). The effects of African American movement styles on teachers’ perceptions and reactions. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 49–57. doi: 10.1177/00224669030370010501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parks, F. R., & Kennedy, J. H. (2007). The impact of race, physical attractiveness, and gender on education majors’ and teachers’ perceptions of student competence. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 936–943. doi: 10.1177/0021934705285955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pietsch, M., & Stubbe, T. C. (2007). Inequality in the transition from primary to secondary school: School choices and educational disparities in Germany. European Educational Research Journal, 6, 424–445. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2007.6.4.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pigott, R. L., & Cowen, E. L. (2000). Teacher race, child race, racial congruence, and teacher ratings of children’s school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 177–196. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4405(99)00041-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811–832. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Podell, D. M., & Soodak, L. C. (1993). Teacher efficacy and bias in special education referrals. The Journal of Educational Research, 86, 247–253. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1993.9941836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Richeson, J. A., & Nussbaum, R. J. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  69. Santavirta, N., Solovieva, S., & Theorell, T. (2007). The association between job strain and emotional exhaustion in a cohort of 1.028 Finnish teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 213–228. doi: 10.1348/000709905X92045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schnabel, K. U., Alfeld, C., Eccles, J. S., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2002). Parental influence on students’ educational choices in the United States and Germany: Different ramifications–Same effect? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 178–198. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56–65. Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004.
  72. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 73, 417–453. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sleeter, C. (2008). Preparing White teachers for diverse students. In S. Feiman-Nemser & D. J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (3rd ed., pp. 559–582). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 391–445). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  75. Srull, T. K. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  76. Stangor, C., & McMillan, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42–61. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.111.1.42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 743–762. doi: 10.1037/a0027627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social Cognition: The Ontario symposium (pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  79. Tenenbaum, H. R., & Ruck, M. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 253–273. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wiggan, G. (2007). Race, school achievement, and educational inequality: Toward a student-based inquiry perspective. Review of Educational Research, 77, 310–333. doi: 10.3102/003465430303947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322–359. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1988). Understanding social knowledge: If only the data could speak for themselves. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 142–192). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  84. Wyer, R. S., Sherman, J. W., & Stroessner, S. J. (1998). The spontaneous suppression of racial stereotypes. Social Cognition, 16, 340–352. doi: 10.1521/soco.1998.16.3.340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationBergische Universität WuppertalWuppertalGermany
  2. 2.University of LuxembourgLuxembourg CityLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations