The perceived value of maths and academic self-efficacy in the appraisal of fear appeals used prior to a high-stakes test as threatening or challenging
- 778 Downloads
Previous work has examined how messages communicated to students prior to high-stakes exams, that emphasise the importance of avoiding failure for subsequent life trajectory, may be appraised as threatening. In two studies, we extended this work to examine how students may also appraise such messages as challenging or disregard them as being of little relevance. In study one we piloted a questionnaire with students studying for their school leaving qualification in maths. Threat appraisals were correlated with low academic self-efficacy, high attainment value and low intrinsic value. Challenge appraisals were correlated with high academic self-efficacy, and high intrinsic, extrinsic and attainment value. In study two, we manipulated attainment value and academic self-efficacy in a series of vignettes. High value and high academic self-efficacy lead to challenge appraisals, high value but low academic self-efficacy lead to threat appraisals and low value lead to a disregarding of messages. These findings show that the relevance of messages is judged on attainment value in a primary appraisal and as a challenge or threat in a subsequent appraisal, based on the expectation of success or failure. These findings also highlight how the effectiveness of such messages may differ depending on student characteristics.
KeywordsFear appeals Value-promoting messages Academic self-efficacy Perceived value Value-control theory
We would like to thank all of the students and staff in participating schools and colleges who gave up their time to help with this research. We would also like to thank Sarah Shaw and Richard Remedios for helping to collect vignette data in Study 2 and Emma Woolley for assisting with data preparation and entry.
- Baird, J. (2009). Country case study: England. In B. Vlaardingerbroek & N. Taylor (Eds.), Secondary school external examination systems: Reliability, robustness and resilience (pp. 29–54). Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., O’Neill, S. A., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task-values in adolescents and children. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 239–247). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Stress and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lowe, P. A., Lee, S. W., Witteborg, K. M., Pritchard, K. W., Luhr, M. E., Cullinan, C. M., et al. (2008). The test anxiety inventory for children and adolescents (TAICA): Examination of the psychometric properties of a new multidimensional measure of test anxiety among elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Psycheducational Assessment, 26(3), 215–230. doi: 10.1177/0734282907303760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Midgley, C. (1992). Goals, goal structures and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., & Allen, M. (2006). Test anxiety. Academic self-efficacy and study skills: A meta-analytic review. In B. M. Gayle, R. W. Preiss, N. Burrell, & M. Allen (Eds.), Classroom interaction and instructional processes: A meta-analytic review (pp. 99–111). Maywah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Putwain, D. W., & Remedios, R. (in press). The scare tactic: Messages which contain fear appeals prior to a high-stakes test predict lower self-determined motivation and exam scores. School Psychology Quarterly.Google Scholar
- Putwain, D. W., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and confidence in study-related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning-related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633–650. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Remedios, R., & Putwain, D. W. (2013). Under pressure: The relation between teacher fear appeals and student motivation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Abstract Retrieved from: http://convention2.allacademic.com/one/aera/aera13/index.php?click_key=1&cmd=Multi+Search+Search+Load+Publication&publication_id=606385&PHPSESSID=8uv45ugpttkgneuu3jhi2mteq5
- Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Resechly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Chistenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1.
- Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2005). Evaluation anxiety. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 141–163). London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar