Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 181–197 | Cite as

How schoolchildren’s acceptance of self and others relate to their attitudes to victims of bullying

Article

Abstract

Previous research has indicated that harm to the mental health of children who are repeatedly victimised by their peers at school can be ameliorated through social or emotional support provided by other students. In this study we examined whether student provictim attitudes are related to more basic attitudes to self and attitudes to others. Measures of these attitudes were developed for use with children, and shown to be internally consistent and possess concurrent validity. Relations between these variables were then examined with a sample of Australian school children (\(N = 212\)) aged between 9 and 14 years. Provictim attitudes correlated significantly (\(r = .55\)) with acceptance of others, but not with acceptance of self (\(r = -.04\)). Controlling for age and gender, multiple regression analyses confirmed these findings. Attitudes to victims were less positive for older students (\(r = -.22\)). Gender differences, however, were not significant. These findings suggest that among schoolchildren self-acceptance is unrelated to positive attitudes towards victims, whereas acceptance of others has a moderately strong relation with provictim attitude. Implications for improving attitudes to victims among school children were examined.

Keywords

Victimisation Bullying Violence Schools  Acceptance of self and others Provictim attitudes 

References

  1. Adler, A. (1938). Social interest: A challenge to mankind. (J. Linton and R. Vaughan, Trans.). London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008) Census of Population and Housing: socio-economic indices of Areas (SEAFA), Australia Media Release 26/3/2008. See http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mediareleasesbytitle/87E66027D6856FD6CA257417001A550A?OpenDocument Accessed 15/11/12.
  4. Baldry, A. C. (2004). What about bullying? An experimental field study to understand students’ attitudes towards bullying and victimisation in Italian middle schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 583–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. E., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergemann, N. (1988). Self-acceptance and acceptance of others: An Afrikaans version of the Berger scales. South African Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 104–108.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, E. M. (1952). The relation between expressed acceptance of self and expressed acceptance of other. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 778–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bliss, T., Robinson, G., & Maines, B. (Eds.). (2008). Mediation and restoration in circle time. London: Optimus Education.Google Scholar
  9. Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., & Flemington, I. (2002). Associations between secondary school pupils’ definitions of bullying, attitudes towards bullying, and tendencies to engage in bullying: Age and sex differences. Educational Studies, 28, 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burns, R. B. (1975). Attitudes to self and to three categories of others in a student group. Educational Studies, 1(3), 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Central Intelligence Agency (2012) World Factbook. See https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2075.html Accessed Nov17th 2012.
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, C. R., Williams, K. R., Guerra, N. G., & Kim, T. E. (2010). Variability in the prevalence of bullying and victimization: A cross-national and methodological analysis. In S. R. Jimerson, S. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 347–362). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Cowie, H. (2011). Peer support as an intervention to counteract school bullying: Listen to the children. Children and Society, 25(4), 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Correia, I., & Dalbert, C. (2008). School bullying: Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims, and defenders. European Psychologist, 13, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization? Developmental Psychology, 34, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellis, A. (2001). Overcoming destructive beliefs, feelings, and behaviors: New directions for rational emotive behavior therapy. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  19. Eslea, M., & Smith, P. K. (2000). Pupil and parent attitudes towards bullying in primary schools. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fey, W. F. (1955). Acceptance by others and its relation to acceptance of self and others: A revaluation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 50, 274–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox, C. L., Elder, T., Gater, J., & Johnson, E. (2010). The association between adolescents’ beliefs in a just world and their attitudes to victims of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flaspohler, P. D., Elfstrom, L., Vanderzee, K. L., Sink, H. E., & Birchmeier, Z. (2009). Stand by me: The effects of peer and teacher support in mitigating the impact of bullying on quality of life. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 636–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haf, C. (1989). Erfahrungen mit einer Kurzform der Selbstakzeptanzskala nach Berger im klinisch-psychologischen Anwendungsbereich (Experiences with a brief version of Berger’s self-acceptance scale in a clinical-psychology setting). Diagnostica, 35(1), 73–80.Google Scholar
  24. Holaday, M., Smith, D. A., & Sherry, A. (2000). Sentence completion tests: A review of the literature and results of a survey of the members of the society for personality assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johann, G. K., & Bergemann, N. (1990). The acceptance of the self and the acceptance of others: A French version of Berger’s scores. Personnalité, 21, 41–51.Google Scholar
  26. Macinnes, D. L. (2006). Self-esteem and self-acceptance: An examination into their relationship and their effect on psychological health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 13, 483–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McIntyre, C. J. (1952). Acceptance by others and its relation to acceptance of self and others. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(3), 624–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maslow, A. (1998). Towards a psychology of being (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Menesini, E., Eslea, M., Smith, P. K., & Genta, M. L. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children’s attitudes towards bully/victim problems in schools. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interaction. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Connell, P., Pepler, D. A., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Pikas, A. (2002). New developments of the Shared Concern Method. School Psychology International, 23, 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rigby, K. (1997). Attitudes and beliefs about bullying among Australian school children. Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 202–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rigby, K. (2000). Effects of peer victimisation in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rigby, K. (2002). New perspectives on bullying. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  37. Rigby, K. (2003). Consequences of bullying in schools. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 583–590.Google Scholar
  38. Rigby, K. (2005). Why do some children bully at school? The contributions of negative attitudes towards victims and the perceived expectations of friends, parents and teachers. School Psychology International, 26, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rigby, K., & Barnes, A. (2002). To tell or not to tell: The victimised student’s dilemma. Youth Studies, Australia, 21(3), 33–36.Google Scholar
  40. Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2005). Student bystanders in Australian schools. Pastoral Care in Education, 23(2), 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behaviour and attitudes to victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson, G., & Maines, B. (2008). Bullying: A complete guide to the support group method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  45. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sainio, M., Veenstra, R., Huitsing, G., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjüorkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relationsto social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shepard, L. A. (1979). Self-acceptance: The evaluative component of the self-concept construct. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying. Childhood, 7, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suinn, R. M. (1961). The relationship between self-acceptance and acceptance of others: A learning theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suinn, R. M., & Hill, H. (1964). Influence of anxiety on the relationship between self-acceptance and acceptance of others. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28, 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson, F. & Smith, P.K (2011) The use and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies in schools. Research Report, DFE-RR098. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  54. Zelen, L. (1954). The relationship of peer acceptance, acceptance of others and self-acceptance. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 61, 446–449.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Hawke Research InstituteUniversity of South AustraliaUnderdaleAustralia
  2. 2.South Australian Education DepartmentAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations