A lesson not to be learned? Understanding stereotype threat does not protect women from stereotype threat
- 1.3k Downloads
This research examines whether reading a text presenting scientific evidence concerning the phenomenon of stereotype threat improves or disrupts women’s performance in a subsequent math task. In two experimental conditions participants (\(N = 118\)) read a text summarizing an experiment in which stereotypes, and not biological differences, were shown to be the cause of women’s underperformance in math (Gender-relevant condition), or the deficits of Afro-Americans on verbal tests (Control condition). Results showed that, whereas men’s performance was not affected by the information provided, women who properly understood the mechanism of stereotype threat had their math performance disrupted in the Gender-relevant condition. These findings suggest that the mere presentation of research evidence on stereotype threat, in the absence of other interventions aimed at reducing the aversive effects of negative stereotypes, may have harmful effects on the targets of stigma.
KeywordsStereotype threat Gender Mathematics Stereotype threat reduction
- Appel, M., & Kronberger, N. (2012). Stereotypes and the achievement gap: Stereotype threat prior to test taking. Educational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9200-4.
- Brown, R. P., & Day, E. A. (2006). The difference isn’t black and white: Stereotype threat and the race gap on Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 979–985.Google Scholar
- Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1–40.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2009). She Figures 2009. Statistics and indicators. Directorate-General for Research. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she_figures_2009_en.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2001.
- Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51.Google Scholar
- Inzlicht, M., & Good, C. (2006). How environments threaten academic performance, self-knowledge, and sense of belonging. In S. Levin & C. van Laar (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological approaches (pp. 129–150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2007). Forewarning and forearming stereotype-threatened students. Communication Education, 56, 119–133.Google Scholar
- Sackett, P. R., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Concerns about generalizing stereotype threat research findings to operational high-stakes testing. In M. Inzlicht & T. Schmader (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 249–263). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wigfield, A., Battle, A., Keller, L. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Sex differences in motivation, self-concept, career aspiration, and career choice: Implications for cognitive development. In A. V. McGillicuddy-De Lisi & R. De Lisi (Eds.), Biology, society, and behavior: The development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 93–124). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar