Longitudinal changes in college math students’ implicit theories of intelligence
- 707 Downloads
This study examined changes over time in implicit theories of intelligence and their relationships to help-seeking and academic performance. College algebra students completed questionnaires during the second week of classes and 2 weeks before the end of the semester (ns = 159 and 145, respectively; 61 students completed questionnaires at both waves). The questionnaires assessed entity and incremental implicit theories of general and math intelligence (beginning and end of semester) and help-seeking (end of semester). Results indicated that students had more incremental views of general than math intelligence. Further, their views became less incremental over the course of the semester; however, this decrease was greater for math than for general intelligence. Participants who exhibited a stronger incremental theory of general intelligence at the beginning of the semester subsequently reported greater help-seeking during the semester. Finally, students who had more entitative views of math intelligence earned lower course grades.
KeywordsImplicit theories of intelligence Math intelligence Helpseeking Math education
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Augustine, N. R. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Retrieved from http://sciencedems.house.gov/Media/File/Reports/natacad_compete_exsum_6feb06.pdf.
- Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M. (Eds.) (2007) Why aren’t there more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Dweck C. S. (1999) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
- Dweck C. S. (2006) Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In: Ceci S. J., Williams W. M. (Eds.) Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Dweck C. S., & Molden D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In: Elliot A., & Dweck C. S. Handbook of competence and motivation. (pp 122–140) New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Hill C., Corbett C., St. Rose A. (2010) Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. AAUW, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Hong Y. Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S. (1995) Implicit theories of intelligence: Reconsidering the role of confidence in achievement motivation. In: Kernis M. (Ed.) Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. Plenum, New York, pp 197–216Google Scholar
- H. R. 2272–110th Congress: America COMPETES Act. (2007). In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr2272.
- H. R. 5116–111th Congress: America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. (2010). In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr5116.
- King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school: The role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.005.
- Rattan, A., Savani, K., Naidu, N. V. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Can everyone become highly intelligent? Cultural differences in and societal consequences of beliefs about the universal potential for intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi: 10.1037/a0029263.
- Seymour E., Hewitt N. M. (1997) Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
- Valian V. (2006) Women at the top in science-and elsewhere. In: Ceci S.J., Williams W. M. (Eds.) Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar