Attributional bias instrument (ABI): validation of a measure to assess ability and effort explanations for math performance
- 423 Downloads
The present work investigates the validation of a newly developed instrument, the attributional bias instrument, based on achievement attribution theories that distinguish between effort and ability explanations of behavior. The instrument further incorporates the distinction between explanations for success versus failure in academic performance. An important characteristic of the instrument is that it can be used to assess biased attributions. For instance, attributional gender bias is the tendency to generate different attributions (explanations) for female versus male students’ performance in math. Whereas boys’ successes in math are attributed to ability, girls’ successes are attributed to effort; conversely, boys’ failures in math are attributed to a lack of effort and girls’ failures to a lack of ability. Previous research has shown this bias to be committed by teachers, parents, and students themselves. In the present study, high school students in Mexico were administered the instrument and asked to generate attributions for their successes and failures in math. Findings revealed: (1) a factor analysis confirmed the proposed structure of the instrument, (2) boys and girls committed the attributional gender bias, replicating effects in U.S. samples, and (3) additional analyses involving related measures further supported valid use of the instrument.
KeywordsAttribution Gender bias Math Instrument Validity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Darom E., Bar-Tal D. (1981) Causal perception of pupils’ success or failure by teachers and pupils: A comparison. Journal of Educational Research 74(4): 233–239Google Scholar
- Eccles J. S. (2007) Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In: Ceci S. J., Williams W. M. (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eccles-Parsons J. S., Adler T. F., Futterman R., Goff S. B., Kaczala C. M., Meece J. L., Midgley C. (1985) Self-perceptions, task perceptions, socializing influences, and the decision to enroll in mathematics. In: Chipman S. F., BrushWilson DM L. R., Wilson D. M. (Eds.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 95–121Google Scholar
- Espinoza, P., da Luz Fontes, A. B., & Arms-Chavez, C. J. (2012). Attributional Gender Bias: Teachers’ ability and effort explanations for students’ math performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2009). LISREL. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
- Leder G. C., Forgasz H. J., Solar C. (1996) Research and intervention programs in mathematics education: A gendered issue. In: Bishop A., Clements K., Keitel C., Kilpatrick J., Laborde C. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, Part 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 943–985Google Scholar
- Roberts, J. K. (1999). Basic concepts of confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED427091).Google Scholar
- Scafidi T., Bui K. (2010) Gender similarities in math performance from middle school through high school. Journal of Instructional Psychology 37(3): 252–255Google Scholar
- Weiner B. (2005) Motivation from an attribution perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In: Elliot A. J., Dweck C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford Press, New York, pp 73–84Google Scholar