Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 533–554 | Cite as

Attributional bias instrument (ABI): validation of a measure to assess ability and effort explanations for math performance

  • Penelope P. Espinoza
  • Stephanie A. Quezada
  • Rodolfo Rincones
  • E. Natalia Strobach
  • María Armida Estrada Gutiérrez
Article

Abstract

The present work investigates the validation of a newly developed instrument, the attributional bias instrument, based on achievement attribution theories that distinguish between effort and ability explanations of behavior. The instrument further incorporates the distinction between explanations for success versus failure in academic performance. An important characteristic of the instrument is that it can be used to assess biased attributions. For instance, attributional gender bias is the tendency to generate different attributions (explanations) for female versus male students’ performance in math. Whereas boys’ successes in math are attributed to ability, girls’ successes are attributed to effort; conversely, boys’ failures in math are attributed to a lack of effort and girls’ failures to a lack of ability. Previous research has shown this bias to be committed by teachers, parents, and students themselves. In the present study, high school students in Mexico were administered the instrument and asked to generate attributions for their successes and failures in math. Findings revealed: (1) a factor analysis confirmed the proposed structure of the instrument, (2) boys and girls committed the attributional gender bias, replicating effects in U.S. samples, and (3) additional analyses involving related measures further supported valid use of the instrument.

Keywords

Attribution Gender bias Math Instrument Validity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aronson J., Fried C. B., Good C. (2002) Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38: 113–125. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackwell L. S., Trzesniewski K. L., Dweck C. S. (2007) Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development 78(1): 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bleeker M. M., Jacobs J. E. (2004) Achievement in math and science: Do mothers’ beliefs matter 12 years later?. Journal of Educational Psychology 96(1): 97–109. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bornholt L., Möller J. (2003) Attributions about achievement and intentions about further study in social context. Social Psychology of Education 6: 217–231. doi:10.1023/a:1024715609124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouchey H. A., Harter S. (2005) Reflected appraisals, academic self-perceptions, and math/science performance during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology 97(4): 673–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butler R. (2000) Making judgments about ability: The role of implicit theories of ability in moderating inferences from temporal and social comparison information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(5): 965–978. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.965 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell J. R., Beaudry J. S. (1998) Gender gap linked to differential socialization for high-achieving senior mathematics students. Journal of Educational Research 91(3): 140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darom E., Bar-Tal D. (1981) Causal perception of pupils’ success or failure by teachers and pupils: A comparison. Journal of Educational Research 74(4): 233–239Google Scholar
  9. Dweck C. S. (2002a) The development of ability conceptions. In: Wigfield A., Eccles J. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 57–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dweck C. S. (2002b) Messages that motivate: How praise molds students’ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In: Aronson J. (Ed.), Improving academic achievement. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 37–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eccles J. S. (2007) Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In: Ceci S. J., Williams W. M. (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles-Parsons J. S., Adler T. F., Futterman R., Goff S. B., Kaczala C. M., Meece J. L., Midgley C. (1985) Self-perceptions, task perceptions, socializing influences, and the decision to enroll in mathematics. In: Chipman S. F., BrushWilson DM L. R., Wilson D. M. (Eds.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 95–121Google Scholar
  13. Espinoza, P., da Luz Fontes, A. B., & Arms-Chavez, C. J. (2012). Attributional Gender Bias: Teachers’ ability and effort explanations for students’ math performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  14. Fennema E., Peterson P. L., Carpenter T. P., Lubinski C. A. (1990) Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 21: 55–65. doi:10.1007/bf00311015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Findley M. J., Cooper H. M. (1983) Locus of control and academic achievement: A literature review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(2): 419–427. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frome P. M., Eccles J. S. (1998) Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2): 435–452. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Georgiou S. N., Stavrinides P., Kalavana T. (2007) Is victor better than victoria at maths?. Educational Psychology in Practice 23(4): 329–342. doi:10.1080/02667360701660951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Good C., Aronson J., Inzlicht M. (2003) Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Applied Developmental Psychology 24: 645–662. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant H., Dweck C. S. (2003) Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(3): 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halpern D. F., Benbow C. P., Geary D. C., Gur R. C., Hyde J. S., Gernsbacher M. A. (2007) The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 8(1): 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032 Google Scholar
  21. Hong Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S., Lin D. M.-S., Wan W. (1999) Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 588–599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu L., Bentler P. M. (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 6(1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hurley A. E., Scandura T. A., Schriesheim C. A., Brannick M. T., Seers A., Vandenberg R. J., Williams L. J. (1997) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior 18(6): 667–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hyde J. S., Lindberg S. M., Linn M. C., Ellis A. B., Williams C. C. (2008) Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science 321(5888): 494–495. doi:10.1126/science.1160364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyde J. S., Mertz J. E. (2009) Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(22): 8801–8807. doi:10.1073/pnas.0901265106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs J. E., Eccles J. S. (1992) The impact of mothers’ gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63: 932–944. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacobs J. E., Lanza S., Osgood D. W., Eccles J. S., Wigfield A. (2002) Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development 73(2): 509–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2009). LISREL. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  29. Leder G. C., Forgasz H. J., Solar C. (1996) Research and intervention programs in mathematics education: A gendered issue. In: Bishop A., Clements K., Keitel C., Kilpatrick J., Laborde C. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, Part 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 943–985Google Scholar
  30. Mangels J. A., Butterfield B., Lamb J., Good C., Dweck C. S. (2006) Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 1(2): 75–86. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Molden D. C., Dweck C. S. (2006) Finding “meaning” in psychology: A lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American Psychologist 61(3): 192–203. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicholls J. G. (1975) Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: Effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31(3): 379–389. doi:10.1037/h0076505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niiya Y., Crocker J., Bartmess E. N. (2004) From vulnerability to resilience: Learning orientations buffer contingent self-esteem from failure. Psychological Science 15: 801–805. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Sullivan J. T., Howe M. L. (1996) Causal attributions and reading achievement: Individual differences in low-income families. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21(4): 363–387. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Räty H., Vänskä J., Kasanen K., Kärkkäinen R. (2002) Parents’ explanation of their child’s performance in mathematics and reading: A replication and extension of Yee and Eccles. Sex Roles 46: 121–128. doi:10.1023/a:1016573627828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts, J. K. (1999). Basic concepts of confirmatory factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED427091).Google Scholar
  37. Ryckman D. B., Peckham P. D. (1987) Gender differences in attributions for success and failure. Journal of Early Adolescence 7(1): 47–63. doi:10.1177/0272431687071006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rytkönen K., Aunola K., Nurmi J. E. (2007) Do parents’ causal attributions predict the accuracy and bias in their children’s self-concept of maths ability? A longitudinal study. Educational Psychology 27(6): 771–788. doi:10.1080/01443410701309316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scafidi T., Bui K. (2010) Gender similarities in math performance from middle school through high school. Journal of Instructional Psychology 37(3): 252–255Google Scholar
  40. Schmader T., Johns M., Barquissau M. (2004) The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles. 50(11–12): 835–850. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seegers G., Boekaerts M. (1996) Gender-related differences in self-referenced cognitions in relation to mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27(2): 215–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shih M., Pittinsky T. L., Ambady N. (1999) Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science 10(1): 80–83. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stipek D. J., Gralinski J. H. (1991) Gender differences in children’s achievement-related beliefs and emotional responses to success and failure in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 361–371. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tiedemann J. (2000) Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 41(2): 191–207. doi:10.1023/a:1003953801526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tiedemann J. (2002) Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 50: 49–62. doi:10.1023/a:1020518104346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tom D., Cooper H. (1986) The effect of student background on teacher performance attributions: Evidence for counterdefensive patterns and low expectancy cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 7: 53–62. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0701_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weiner B. (1986) An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weiner B. (2005) Motivation from an attribution perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In: Elliot A. J., Dweck C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. Guilford Press, New York, pp 73–84Google Scholar
  49. Whitley B. E., Frieze I. H. (1985) Children’s causal attributions for success and failure in achievement settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 77(5): 608–616. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wigfield A., Eccles J. S. (2000) Expectancy-value tcxheory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1): 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yee D., Eccles J. S. (1988) Parent perceptions and attributions for children’s math achievement. Sex Roles 19: 317–333. doi:10.1007/bf0028984 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Penelope P. Espinoza
    • 1
  • Stephanie A. Quezada
    • 2
  • Rodolfo Rincones
    • 1
  • E. Natalia Strobach
    • 2
  • María Armida Estrada Gutiérrez
    • 3
  1. 1.Educational Leadership and Foundations College of EducationThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyThe University of Texas at El PasoEl PasoUSA
  3. 3.Humanities Department, Program of EducationUniversidad Autonoma de Ciudad JuarezCiudad Juárez, ChihMexico

Personalised recommendations