Whose fault is it anyway: How do parents respond to their child’s setbacks?
- 314 Downloads
We documented what parents report as the cause of their child’s academic and conduct setbacks and what they say they do in response. We recruited an opportunity sample of 479 parents and narrowed our sample to parents of children without disabilities between the ages of 5–18 (N = 312). Parents responded to open-ended questions, and we coded responses into categories of disciplinary tactics and types of attributions. Parents who reported experience with child setbacks significantly differed from parents who did not report such experience on several outcome variables. Parents did not exhibit hedonic biasing such that most reported causes of setbacks were controllable by the child; reported controllable causes correlated with the reported use of punishment. Our findings suggest that parental behavior change efforts must also address parents’ attributions, or verbal explanations, of causes of events. We discuss implications of our findings for child and parent researchers, educators, and practitioners.
KeywordsParents Children Discipline Attributions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baldry A. C., Farrington D. P. (2000) Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 10(1): 2000. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(200001/02)10:1<17::AID-CASP526>3.0.CO;2-M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baumrind D. (1971) Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4(1, Pt.2), 1–103. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/dev/.
- Cohen J. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (revised edition). Academic Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Goodnow J. J., Collins W. A. (1990) Development according to parents: The nature, sources, and consequences of parents’ ideas. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
- Landis, J. R., Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, (33), 159–174 Retrieved from http://www.biometrics.tibs.org/.
- Lucas V. L., Collins S., Langdon P. E. (2009) The causal attributions of teaching staff towards children with intellectual disabilities: A comparison of ’vignettes’ depicting challenging behaviour with ’real’ incidents of challenging behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 22(1): 1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00428.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maccoby E. E. (2002) Parenting effects: Issues and controversies. In: Borkowski J. G., Ramey S. L., Bristol-Power M. (Eds.), Parenting and the child’s world: Influences on academic, intellectual, and social-emotional development. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 25–35Google Scholar
- Turner K. M. T., Nicholson J. M., Sanders M. R. (2011) The role of practitioner self-efficacy, training, program and workplace factors on the implementation of an evidence-based parenting intervention in primary care. The Journal of Primary Prevention 32(2): 95–112. doi: 10.1007/s10935-011-0240-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weiner B. (1986) Attribution, emotion, and action. In: Sorrentino R. M., Higgins E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 281–312Google Scholar
- Weiner B. (1995) Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. Guilford Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar