Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 251–269 | Cite as

Enhancing autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue in schools: conceptualization and socio-emotional effects of an intervention program

  • Haya Kaplan
  • Avi Assor


We present a conceptualization and a 2 year program of autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue among teachers and students that is based on self-determination theory (Deci and Ryan in Psychol Inq 11(4):227–268, 2000) and Buber’s (1960) philosophy. The program was applied in 18 seventh grade classes (420 students). Findings showed: (a) increases in positive emotions and in perceptions of teachers as conducting more dialogue on the relevance of studies to students’ lives, and (b) decreases in negative emotions and in classroom violence. The findings highlight the importance of autonomy-supportive I–Thou dialogue and suggest that such dialogue might help adolescents to experience studying and school as more pleasant and secure.


Autonomy support I–Thou dialogue Intervention program School violence Students’ feelings Choice Relevance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderman E. M., Maehr M. L., Midgley C. (1999) Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education 32: 131–147Google Scholar
  2. Assor A. (1995) Promoting personal and social growth in schools: A motivational analysis. In: Danilov J. (eds) Rethinking the goals of education. Position papers issued by the Pedagogical Secretariat. Ministry of Education (Hebrew), Jerusalem, pp 195–282Google Scholar
  3. Assor A. (1999) Value accessibility and teachers’ ability to encourage independent and critical thought in students. Social Psychology of Education 2: 1–24Google Scholar
  4. Assor A. (2001) Promoting intrinsic motivation for learning in schools. In: Kaplan A., Assor A. (eds) Education for thinking, 20, motivation for learning: New conceptions. Branco-Wise Institute (Hebrew), Jerusalem, pp 167–190Google Scholar
  5. Assor, A. (2002, May). Teacher-based, class-based, and self-based determinants of aggression in the classroom. In Paper presented at the 2nd international seminar on violence and adolescence, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
  6. Assor A. (2003) A model of a school that supports psychological needs and fosters emotional competence. In: Aviram R. (eds) Schools of the future. Masada (Hebrew), Tel Aviv, pp 165–210Google Scholar
  7. Assor, A., Alfi, O., Kaplan, H., Katz, I., Roth, G., Kaplan. A., & Tzuleng, K. (2000). Applying current motivational theories to promote extensive school reforms. In Symposium at the conference of the Israeli Educational Research Association (AYALA) in Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
  8. Assor, A., Alfi, O., Kaplan, H., Roth, G., & Katz, I. (2000). The autonomy relatedness—competence (ARC) program. In Paper presented at the 7th workshop on achievement and task motivation, Lueven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  9. Assor A., Eilot K. (2001) Values of Jewish Israeli children: Measurement, development, and gender effects. Megamot, special issue on “Children in Israel” 41: 148–179 (Hebrew)Google Scholar
  10. Assor A., Kaplan H. (2001) Mapping the domain of autonomy support: Five important ways to enhance or undermine student’s experience of autonomy in learning. In: Effklides A., Kuhl J., Sorrentino R. (eds) Trends and prospects in motivational research. Kluwer, Boston, pp 101–120Google Scholar
  11. Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G., Kanat-Maymon Y. (2005) Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction 15: 397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G. (2002) Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Assor A., Kaplan H., Feinberg O., Tal K. (2009) Promoting teachers’ internalization of practices combining vision with voice. A learning and implementation structure based on self-determination theory. Theory and Research in Education 7(2): 234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Assor A., Roth G., Deci E. L. (2004) The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality 72: 47–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buber, M. (1960). I and Thou (2nd edn.). (R. G. Smith, Trans.) New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  16. Buber M. (1959) The secret of dialogue: On man and his existential stance. The Bialik Institute (Hebrew), Jerusalem, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  17. Buber M. (1955) Between man and man. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Buck R. (1988) Human motivation and emotion. Wiley, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Connell, J. P., & Broom, J. (2004). ‘The toughest nut to crack: First things first’s (FTF) approach to improving teaching and learning. Report prepared for the US Department of Education. Philadelphia: Institute for Research and Reform in Education. Available at
  20. Cook-Sather A. (2002) Authorizing students’ perspectives: Toward trust, dialogue and change in education. Educational Researcher 31(4): 3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deci E. L. (2009) Large-scale school reform as viewed from the self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Research in Education 7: 244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. Plenum Press, New-YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation (Vol. 38, pp. 237–288). Lincoln, NE: University Of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  24. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (eds) (2002) Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
  26. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2008) Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology 49: 14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M., Gagné M., Leone D. R., Usunov J., Kornazheva B. P. (2001) Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern Bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27: 930–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eccles J. S., Midgley C. (1989) Stage-environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In: Ames C., Ames R. (eds) Research on motivation in education. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 139–188Google Scholar
  29. Eccles J. S., Lord S., Buchanan C. M. (1996) School transitions in early adolescence: What are we doing to our young people?. In: Graber J., Brooks-Gunn J., Petersen A. (eds) Transitions though adolescence: Interpersonal Domains and Context. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J.Google Scholar
  30. Feinberg, O., Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2005, August). SDT as a basis for a comprehensive school reform: Principles, description, and some outcomes. In Paper presented at EARLI conference, University of Cyprus, Nicosia.Google Scholar
  31. Feinberg, O., Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2006, September). Internalization of the SDT’ concepts and approach as a basis for a comprehensive school reform. In Paper presented at the 10th international conference on motivation, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.Google Scholar
  32. Feinberg, A., Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2008). Personal growth in a caring community: An autonomy-supportive program for reducing violence and enhancing considerateness. Dapim, 46, 21–61, Mofet Institute, Tel Aviv (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  33. Frijda N. H. (1999) Emotions and hedonic experience. In: Kahneman D., Diener E., Schwarz N. (eds) Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY, pp 190–210Google Scholar
  34. Goldstein J. D., Iso-Ahola S. E. (2008) Determinants of parents’ “sideline rage” emotions and behaviors at youth soccer games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38: 1442–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grolnick W. C., Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (1997) Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In: Grusec J. E., Kuczynski L. (eds) Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory. Wiley, New-York, pp 135–161Google Scholar
  36. Grolnick W. S., Ryan R. M. (1989) Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology 81: 143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harter, S. (1981). A model of mastery motivation in children: Individual differences and development change. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), In The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 215–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Huberman M. (1993) The lives of teachers. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaplan, H., & Assor, A. (1998a, January). Teachers’ response to students’ needs as a predictor of internalization of the value of learning. In Paper presented at the international research workshop on values, psychological structure, behavioral outcomes and inter generalization transmission of the Israel Science Foundation and Ben Gurion University, Maale Hachamisha, Israel.Google Scholar
  40. Kaplan, H., & Assor, A. (1998b, March). The meaning and consequences of autonomy related teachers-actions for students: A developmental perspective. In Paper presented at the 6th international workshop on achievement and task motivation, Saloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
  41. Kaplan H., Danino M. (2002) Diversity as challenge and opportunity for growth in school: Developing a caring community for students with learning disabilities. Hayeoz Hachinchi, the Journal of the Israeli Association of Educational Counselors, 11: 64–87 (Hebrew)Google Scholar
  42. Kaplan, H., Orenstein, E., Assor, A., Starkman., & Tzuleng, K. (2000). The call for dialogue: Exploring the qualities of meaningful dialogue between students and teachers concerning needs, satisfaction and its effect on students’ intrinsic motivation. In Paper presented at the 7th WATM, at Lueven University, Belgium.Google Scholar
  43. Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Roth, G. (2003a, April). Is autonomy important for children? Examining the effects of autonomy support and autonomy suppression at different ages. In Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development conference, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  44. Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Roth, G. (2003b, April). Is autonomy important for all students? Evidence from a longitudinal study with children of different parental education. In Paper presented at the 84th annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  45. Katz I., Assor A. (2007) When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review 19: 429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Koestner R., Ryan R.M., Bernieri F., Holt K. (1984) Setting limits on children’s behavior: The differential effects of controlling versus informational styles on children’s intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality 54: 233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kortzwiel D. (1978) Martin Buber and modern educational thought. Mofet. (Hebrew), Tel AvivGoogle Scholar
  48. Kron T. (1994) Dialogical dimension in therapist–client and supervisor’s relations. In: Kron T., Yeroshalmi H. (eds) Supervision in psychotherapy. Magnes (Hebrew), Jerusalem, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  49. La Guardia J. G., Ryan R. M., Couchman C. E., Deci E. L. (2000) Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79: 367–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levin H., Belfield C., Muennig P., Rouse C. (2006) The costs and benefits of an excellent education for all of America’s children. Teachers College, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Neighbors C., Vietor N.A., Knee C.R. (2002) A motivational model of driving anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 324–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Orenstein E., Openhimer D., Katz I., Feldman A., Binyamini D., & Shadmi H. (1996) Between teachers and learners: Part 2. The learning, investigating community. Ministry of Education. (Hebrew), JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  53. Reeve J. (2006) Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal 106: 225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reeve J., Assor A. (2011) Do social institutions necessarily suppress individuals’ need for autonomy? The possibility of schools as autonomy promoting contexts across the globe. In: Chirkov R., Ryan R. M., Sheldon K. (eds) Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Global perspectives on the psychology of freedom and people’s well-being. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Reeve J., Jung H. (2006) What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology 98: 209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Richardson P. W., WattH. M. G. (2006) Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1): 27–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roth G., Assor A., Kanat-Maymon Y., Kaplan H. (2007) Perceived autonomy in teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 99: 761–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Roth G., Kanat-Maymon Y., Bibi U. (2011) Prevention of school bullying: The important role of autonomy-supportive teaching and internalization of pro-social values. British Journal of Educational Psychology 81(4): 654–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan R. M. (1989) Social ontology and its relevance for psychological theory. New Ideas in Psychology 7: 115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryan R. M. (1991) The nature of the self in autonomy and relatedness. In: Strauss J., Goethals G. R. (eds) The self: Interdisciplinary approaches. Springer, New York, pp 208–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ryan, R. M. (1993). Agency and organization: Intrinsic motivation, autonomy and the self in psychological development. In J. Jacobs (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 1–56). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  62. Ryan R. M. (1995) Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality 63(3): 397–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000) The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry 11: 319–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2002) An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In: Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (eds) Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY, pp 3–33Google Scholar
  66. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2004) Autonomy is no illusion: Self-determination theory and the empirical study of authenticity, awareness, and will. In: Greenberg J., Koole S. L., Pyszczynski T. (eds) Handbook of experimental existential psychology. Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 449–479Google Scholar
  67. Ryan R. M., Grolnick W. S. (1986) Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of children’s perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ryan R. M., Sheldon K. M., Kasser T., Deci E. L. (1996) All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. In: Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. (eds) The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford Press, New York, pp 7–26Google Scholar
  69. Sher-Censor E., Parke R. D., Coltrane S. (2011) Parents’ promotion of psychological autonomy, psychological control, and Mexican–American adolescents’ adjustment. Journal of Youth & Adolescence 40: 620–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sfard A. (1998) On the two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27(2): 4–13Google Scholar
  71. Skinner E. A., Belmont M. J. (1993) Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology 85(4): 571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Soenens B., Vansteenkiste M., Niemiec C. P. (2009) Should parental prohibition of adolescents’ peer relationships be prohibited? The role of parental autonomy-support and control. Personal Relationships 16: 507–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Solomon D., Battistisch V., Watson M., Schaps E., Lewis C. (2000) A six-district study of educational change: Direct and mediated effects of the child development project. Social Psychology of Education 4: 3–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Watt M. G., Richardson P. W. (2008) Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction: Special Issue Motivation for Teaching 18: 408–428Google Scholar
  75. Weinstein N., Hodgins H. S., Ostvik-White E. (2011) Humor as aggression: Effects of motivation on hostility expressed in humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100: 1043–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weinstock M., Assor A., Broide G. (2009) Schools as promoters of moral development: The essential role of teachers’ encouragement of critical thinking. Social Psychology of Education. 12: 137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kaye Academic College of EducationBeer-shevaIsrael
  2. 2.Ben Gurion University of the NegevBeer-shevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations