Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 165–180 | Cite as

A social network analysis of student retention using archival data



This study attempts to determine if a relationship exists between first-to-second-year retention and social network variables for a cohort of first-year students at a small liberal arts college. The social network is reconstructed using not survey data as is most common, but rather using archival data from a student information system. Each student is given a retention score and an attrition score based on the behavior of their immediate relationships in the network. Those scores are then entered into a logistic regression that includes tradition background and performance variables that are traditionally significantly related to retention. Students’ friends’ retention and attrition behaviors are found to have a greater impact on retention that any background or performance variable.


Retention Higher education Social network Density Attrition Liberal arts 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (eds.) (2005) Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Cartwright D., Harary F. (1956) Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review 63(5): 277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho H., Gay G., Davidson B., Ingraffea A. (2007) Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers and Education 49(2): 309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christakis N. A., Fowler J. H. (2008) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. The New England Journal of Medicine 357(4): 370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dawson S. (2008) A student of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community. Educational Technology & Society 11(3): 224–238Google Scholar
  6. Dawson S. (2010) “Seeing” the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(5): 736–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Nooy W., Mrvar A., Batagelj V. (2005) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Durkheim E. (1951) Suicide: A study in sociology. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Eggens L., van der Werf M. P. C., Bosker R. J. (2008) The influence of personal networks and social support on study attainment of students in university education. Higher Education 55(5): 553–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Everett M. G., Borgatti S. P. (2005) Extending centrality. In: Carrington P. J., Scott J., Wasserman S. (eds.) Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 57–76Google Scholar
  11. Fruchterman T. M. J., Reingold E. M. (1991) Graph drawing by force directed placement. Software-Practice and Experience 21: 1129–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson G.R., Taylor R.G. (1970) Interaction of ability and personality: Another look at the drop-out problem in an institute of technology. Journal of Counseling Psychology 17: 540–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heider F. (1946) Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology 21: 107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marsden P. V. (2005) Recent developments in network measurement. In: Carrington P. J., Scott J., Wasserman S. (eds.) Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8–30Google Scholar
  15. Reffay C., Chanier T. (2003) How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. In: Wasson B. B., Ludvigsen S., Hoppe U. (eds.) Designing for change in networked learning environments: Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning 2003. Kluwer, Dordrect, pp 493–502Google Scholar
  16. Rizzuto T. E., LeDoux J., Hatala J. P. (2009) It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know: Testing a model of the relative importance of social networks to academic performance. Social Psychology of Education 12(2): 175–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomas S. L. (2000) Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education 71(5): 591–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tinto V. (1975) Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research 5(1): 9–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Information ServicesRhodes CollegeMemphisUSA
  2. 2.Welch ConsultingWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations