The role of attractiveness and aggression in high school popularity
- First Online:
- 714 Downloads
This study examines the effects of physical attractiveness and aggression on popularity among high school students. Previous work has found positive relationships between aggression and popularity and physical attractiveness and popularity. The current study goes beyond this work by examining the interactive effects of physical attractiveness and aggression on popularity. Controlling for race and gender, the results indicate that attractive students are seen as more physically and relationally aggressive than those who are less attractive. We also found that those who are both physically attractive and aggressive are perceived to be more popular than those without such characteristics. However, the same interaction showed the opposite effect when predicting sociometric popularity instead of perceived popularity. These results contribute to the understanding of the differences between those who are well-liked (sociometric popularity) and those who are socially visible (perceived popularity), and the unique predictors of these two dimensions of status in the peer group.
KeywordsPopularity Aggression Physical attractiveness Adolescent development Sociometric popularity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adler P.A., Adler P. (1998) Peer power: preadolescent culture and identity. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
- Aiken L.S., West S.G. (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
- Buss D.M. (1987) Mate selection criteria: An evolutionary perspective. In: Crawford C., Krebs D.L. (eds) Sociobiology and psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence, Erlbaum, pp 335–351Google Scholar
- Cillessen A.H.N., Borch C. (2006) Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence 29: 935–959Google Scholar
- Cillessen A.H.N., Borch C. (2008) Analyzing social networks in adolescence. In: Card N., Selig J., Little T. (eds) Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences. Routledge, New York, pp 61–86Google Scholar
- Merton R.K. (1949) Social theory and social structure. Ill. Free Press, GlencoeGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal R., Jacobson L. (1968) Pygmalion in the classroom. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal R. (1976) Experimenter effects on behavioral research (2nd ed.). Irvington, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Symons D. (1979) The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar