Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Classroom justice and psychological engagement: students’ and teachers’ representations

  • 445 Accesses

  • 31 Citations


This article presents the results of a study carried out with the aim to: (1) analyze secondary school students’ and their teachers’ ideal representations of classroom justice, (2) deepen the topic of students’ sense of injustice, and (3) explore the links between students’ perceived injustice and their psychological engagement in school, measured on different aspects (identification with one’s own class, learning motivation, dialogue with teachers). A questionnaire was distributed to 400 Italian secondary school students and their 79 teachers. Results show that the representations of ideal classroom justice refer to communication, principle of equality and principles of effort/need, and that the positions of teachers and students on these representations differ. Moreover, students report a rather diffuse and shared feeling of being treated in an unjust manner by their teachers, and this affects their psychological engagement in school. Results are commented on their theoretical, methodological and applicative implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Alexander R. (2004) Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos, Cambridge

  2. Bies R. J., Moag J. S. (1986) Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations 1: 43–55

  3. Chory R. M. (2007) Enhancing student perceptions of fairness: The relationship between instructor credibility and classroom justice. Communication Education 56: 89–105

  4. Chory-Assad R. M. (2002) Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly 50: 58–77

  5. Chory-Assad R. M., Paulsel M. L. (2004a) Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly 52: 98–114

  6. Chory-Assad R. M., Paulsel M. L. (2004b) Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education 53: 253–273

  7. Cropanzano R., Greenberg J. (1997) Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In: Cooper C. L., Robertson I. T. (eds) International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley, London

  8. Dalbert C., Maes J. (2002) Belief in a just world as a personal resource in school. In: Ross M., Miller D. T. (eds) The justice motive in social life. Essays in honour of Melvin Lerner. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  9. Dalbert C., Stoeber J. (2005) The belief in a just world and distress at school. Social Psychology of Education 8: 123–135

  10. Dar Y., Erhard R., Resh N. (1998) Perceiving social cleavages and inequalities: The case of Israeli adolescents. Youth and Society 30: 32–84

  11. Deutsch M. (1975) Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?.  Journal of Social Issues 31: 137–149

  12. Deutsch M. (1985) Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

  13. Emler N., Reicher S. (2005) Delinquency: Cause or consequence of social exclusion?. In: Abrams D., Marques J., Hoggs M. (eds) The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

  14. Feather N. T. (1999) Values, achievement and justice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

  15. Gouveia-Pereira M., Vala J., Palmonari A., Rubini M. (2003) School experience, relational justice and legitimation of authority. European Journal of Psychology of Education 3: 309–325

  16. Lerner R. M., Steinberg L. (2004) Handbook of adolescent psychology. Wiley, New York

  17. Leventhal G. S. (1980) What should be done with equity theory?. In: Gergen K. J., Greenberg M. S., Willis R. H. (eds) Social exchanges: Advances in theory and research. Plenum, New York

  18. Lind E. A., Tyler T. R. (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum, New York

  19. Myhill D. (2006) Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education 21(1): 19–41

  20. Paulsel M. L., Chory-Assad R. M. (2005) Perceptions of instructor interactional justice as a predictor of student resistance. Communication Research Reports 22: 283–291

  21. Platow M. J., Wenzel M., Nolan M. (2003) The importance of social identity and self-categorization process for creating and responding to fairness. In: Haslam S. A., Knippenberg D., Paltow M. J., Ellemers N. (eds) Social identity at work. Developing theory for organizational practice. Psychology Press, New York and Hove

  22. Resh N. (2009) Justice in grades allocation: Teachers’ perspectives. Social Psychology of Education 12(3): 315–325

  23. Resh N., Sabbagh C. (2009) Justice in teaching. In: Saha L., Dworkin A.G. (eds) International handbook of research on teachers and teaching. Springer, Dordrecht

  24. Sabbagh C. (2001) A taxonomy of normative and empirical oriented theories of distributive justice. Social Justice Research 14: 237–263

  25. Sabbagh C., Faher-Aledeen R., Resh N. (2004) Evaluation of grade distribution: A comparison of Druze and Jewish pupils in Israel. Social Psychology of Education 7(3): 313–337

  26. Sabbagh C., Resh N., Mor M., Vanhuysse P. (2006) Spheres of justice within schools: Reflections and evidence on the distribution of educational goods. Social Psychology of Education 9: 97–118

  27. Tata J. (1999) Grade distributions, grading procedures, and students’ evaluations of instructors: A justice perspective. The Journal of Psychology 133: 263–271

  28. Thibaut J., Walker L. (1975) Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  29. Thorkildsen T. A. (1989) Justice in the classroom: The student’s view. Child Development 60: 323–334

  30. Törnblom K. Y., Vermunt R. (2007) Towards an integration of distributive justice, procedural justice, and social resource theories. Social Justice Research 20: 312–335

  31. Tyler T. R., Bies R. (1990) Interpersonal aspects of procedural justice. In: Carroll J. S. (eds) Applied social psychology in business settings. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

  32. Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. (2000) Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

  33. Tyler T. R., Blader S. L. (2003) The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7: 349–361

  34. Tyler T. R., Lind E. A. (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna M. P. (eds) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25). Academic Press, San Diego, CA

  35. Walzer M. (1983) Spheres of justice. Basic Books, New York

  36. Weinstock M., Assor A., Broide G. (2009) Schools as promoters of moral judgment: The essential role of teacher’s encouragement of critical thinking. Social Psychology of Education 12: 137–151

  37. Wells G. (2007) Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development 50: 244–274

  38. Wubbels T., Brekelmans M. (2005) Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research 43: 6–24

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Luisa Molinari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berti, C., Molinari, L. & Speltini, G. Classroom justice and psychological engagement: students’ and teachers’ representations. Soc Psychol Educ 13, 541–556 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9128-9

Download citation


  • Classroom justice
  • Ideals of justice
  • Psychological engagement