Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 185–205 | Cite as

The influence of culture on teacher commitment

  • Nordin Abd Razak
  • I. Gusti Ngurah Darmawan
  • John P. Keeves
Article

Abstract

Culture is believed to be an important factor that influences various aspects of human life, such as behaviour, thinking, perceptions and attitudes. This article examines the similarities and differences in the influence of culture on teacher commitment in three types of Malaysian primary schools. Since commitment to teaching has rarely been investigated in the field of education, it is necessary to identify initially the dimensions of teacher commitment and their interrelationships that are likely to operate in schools. Each of the three types of schools in which this study is conducted is related to one of the three major cultural groups in Malaysia, namely, the Malay, Chinese and Indian cultures. An investigation is undertaken of the similarities and differences between these three groups with respect to cultural orientation with school leadership, in-school working conditions and teacher commitment as the criteria. The statistical analysis, conducted at the teacher level, is path analysis with latent variables using partial least squares regression to estimate the direct and indirect effects for the different ethnic groups of the main variables on teacher commitment. The differences reported between groups are of sufficient strength to argue that analysis with pooled data are largely inappropriate and consideration needs to be given to separate analysis for the various cultural subgroups both within a country and between countries where the effects of culture are largely different.

Keywords

Culture Cultural orientation School leadership In-school working conditions Teacher commitment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, T., Heafner, T., & Bartz, D. (2006). An examination of the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement. Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, California, April 10.Google Scholar
  2. Barker B. (2001) Do leaders matter?. Educational Review 53(1): 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bass B. M. (1997) Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?. American Psychologist 52(2): 130–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clugston M., Howell J. P., Dorfman P. W. (2000) Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment. Journal of Management 26: 5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen A. (2007) An examination of the relationships between commitments and culture among five cultural groups of Israeli teachers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 38(1): 34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved May 22, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.
  7. Dimmock C., Walker A. (1998) Comparative educational administration: Developing a cross-cultural conceptual framework. Educational Administration Quarterly 34(4): 558–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimmock C., Walker A. (2000) Developing comparative school leadership and management: A cross-cultural approach—Editorial. School Leadership and Management 20(2): 137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Firestone W. A., Pennell J. R. (1993) Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research 63(4): 489–525Google Scholar
  10. Government of Malaya. (1956). Report of the education committee, 1956: The Razak Report. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printers.Google Scholar
  11. Hallinger P., Heck R. H. (1996) Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly 32(1): 5–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallinger P., Leithwood K. (1996) Culture and educational administration: An introduction. Journal of Educational Administration 34(5): 4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofstede G. (1980) The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies 14(1): 75–89Google Scholar
  14. Hofstede G. (1991) Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hofstede G. (1994) Cultures and organisations—intercultural co-operation and its importance for survival. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofstede G. (2001) Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  17. Huberman, M. (1993). The lives of teachers. With Marie-Madeleine Grounauer & Jurg Marti (J. Neufield, Trans.). New York: Teachers College Press (First published in Switzerland as La vie des enseignants by Editions Delachaux & Niestle in 1989).Google Scholar
  18. Kirkman B. L., Lowe K. B., Gibson C. B. (2006) A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies 37(3): 285–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kushman J. W. (1992) The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: a study of urban elementary and middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly 28(1): 5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leithwood K. (1994) Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly 30(4): 498–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Louis, K. S. (1991). The effects of teacher quality of work life in secondary schools on commitment and sense of efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Mathieu J. E., Zajac D. (1990) A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin 108(2): 171–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer J. P., Allen N. J. (1997) Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  24. Nisbett R. E. (2003) The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently ... and why. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Nisbett R. E. (2009) Intelligence and how to get it. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Omar, S. A., & Aziz, I. (2002). Membentuk nilai positif dan komitmen pekerja dalam organisasi. Dewan Ekonomi (pp. 32–33) February.Google Scholar
  27. Park I. (2005) Teacher commitment and its effects on students achievement in American high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation 11(5): 461–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Randall D. M. (1993) Cross-cultural research on organizational commitment: A review and application of Hofstede’s value survey module. Journal of Business Research 26(1): 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reyes P. (1990) Linking commitment, performance, and productivity. In: Reyes P. (eds) Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance, and productivity. Sage Publications, San Francisco, CA, pp 15–21Google Scholar
  30. Rosenholtz S. J. (1989) Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Sellin N. (1990) PLSPATH version 3.01 program manual. Hamburg University, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  32. Sellin N. (1995) Partial least squares modeling in research on educational achievement. In: Lehmann R. H. (Ed.) Reflections on educational achievement: Papers in honour of T. Neville Postlethwaite. Waxmann, New York, pp 256–267Google Scholar
  33. Sellin N., Keeves J. P. (1997) Path analysis with latent variables. In: Keeves J. P. (Ed.) Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 633–640Google Scholar
  34. Sendut H., Madsen J., Thong G. (1990) Managing in a plural society. Longman, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  35. Singelis T. M., Brown W. J. (1995) Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research 21(3): 354–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh K., Billingsley B. S. (1998) Professional support and its effects on teachers’ commitment. Journal of Educational Research 91(4): 229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Somech A., Bogler R. (2002) Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly 38(4): 555–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Triandis H. C. (2001) The study of cross cultural management and organization: The future. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management 1(1): 17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tsui K. T., Cheng Y. C. (1999) School organisational health and teacher commitment: A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation 5(3): 249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walker A., Dimmock C. (2000) Mapping the way ahead: Leading educational leadership into the globalized world. School Leadership and Management 20(2): 227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan J., Hunt J. G. (2005) A cross cultural perspective on perceived leadership effectiveness. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management 5(1): 49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nordin Abd Razak
    • 1
  • I. Gusti Ngurah Darmawan
    • 2
  • John P. Keeves
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Educational StudiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.School of EducationThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations