Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 137–151 | Cite as

Schools as promoters of moral judgment: the essential role of teachers’ encouragement of critical thinking

  • Michael Weinstock
  • Avi Assor
  • Galia Broide
Article

Abstract

The assumption that high level functioning is characterized by a great deal of autonomy is central to some major theories of moral development [Kohlberg (in T. Lickona (ed.) Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues, 1976); Piaget (The moral judgment of the child, 1932)] and to the self-determination theory of motivation [Ryan and Deci (The American Psychologist, 55, 68–78, 2000)]. Based on these theories, we hypothesized that students’ perceptions of their teachers as autonomy supportive, mainly in the form of encouragement of critical thinking, and perhaps also choice, would be positively associated with students’ advanced moral judgment. Data collected from 12th grade students in two regular schools and two democratic schools supported this hypothesis. Results also showed that being a student in a democratic school (as opposed to a regular one) was associated with autonomous moral judgment, and that this association was mediated by students’ perceptions of teachers as encouraging criticism, but not choice. A possible implication is that programs of moral education should explicitly promote teachers’ inclination to encourage critical thinking in their students.

Keywords

Autonomy support Self-determination theory Adolescence Moral autonomy Critical thinking Democratic schools 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfi O., Assor A., Katz I. (2004) Learning to allow temporary failure: Potential benefits, supportive practices and teacher concerns. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 30: 27–41. doi: 10.1080/0260747032000162299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Assor A. (1999) Value accessibility and teachers’ ability to encourage independent and critical thought in students. Social Psychology of Education 2: 315–338. doi: 10.1023/A:1009664825449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assor A., Cohen-Melayev M., Kaplan A., Friedman D. (2005) Choosing to stay religious in a modern world: Socialization and exploration processes leading to an integrated internalization of religion among Israeli Jewish youth. In: Maehr M.L., Karabenick S. (eds) Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol 14 Religion and motivation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 105–150Google Scholar
  4. Assor A., Kaplan H. (2001) Mapping the domain of autonomy support: Five important ways to enhance or undermine students experience of autonomy in learning. In: Efklides A., Kuhl J., Sorrentino R. (eds) Trends and prospects in motivation research. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 101–120Google Scholar
  5. Assor A., Kaplan H., Roth G. (2002) Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. The British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 261–278. doi: 10.1348/000709902158883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Assor A., Roth G., Deci E.L. (2004) The emotional costs of parents’ conditional regard: A self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Personality 72: 47–88. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00256.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenberg N., Miller P.A., Shell R., McNalley S., Shea C. (1991) Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 27: 849–857. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gagné M. (2003) The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in the engagement of prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion 27: 199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grolnick W.S., Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. (1997) Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. In: Grusec J.E., Kuczynski L. (eds) Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory. Wiley, New York, pp 135–161Google Scholar
  11. Joseph P.B., Efron S. (2005) Seven worlds of moral education. Phi Delta Kappan 86: 525–534Google Scholar
  12. Kaplan, H., Assor, A., & Roth, G.(2003). Is autonomy important for all students? Evidence from a longitudinal study of children with different levels of parental education. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  13. Katz I., Assor A. (2007) When choice motivates and when it does not. Educational Psychology Review 19: 429–442. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9027-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kohlberg L. (1976) Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In: Lickona T. (eds) Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp 31–53Google Scholar
  15. Kuhn D. (2005) Education for thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Le Furgy W.G., Woloshin G.W. (1969) Immediate and long-term effects of experimentally induced social influence in the modification of adolescents’ moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 12: 104–110. doi: 10.1037/h0027563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lind G., Wakenhut R. (1985) Testing for moral judgment competence. In: Lind G., Hartmann H.A., Wakenhut R. (eds) Moral development and the social environment. Studies in the philosophy and psychology of moral judgment and education. Precedent Publishing Inc, Chicago, pp 79–105Google Scholar
  18. Lipman M. (2003) Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Lipman M., Sharp A.M., Oscanyan F.S. (1980) Philosophy in the classroom (2nd ed.). Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Nissim, R. S. (1980). The development of helping behavior and moral judgment in adolescence. MA thesis, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
  21. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36: 717–731Google Scholar
  22. Piaget J. (1932) The moral judgment of the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Reeve J., Bolt E., Cai Y. (1999) Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 537–458. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rest J. (1979) Development in judging moral issues. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryan R.M., Connell J.P. (1989) Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: 749–761. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist 55: 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shor I. (1992) Empowering education. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Vansteenkiste M., Simons J., Lens W., Soenens B., Matos L. (2005) Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy-supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development 76: 483–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walsh, C. (2000). Reconstructing Larry: Assessing the legacy of Lawrence Kohlberg. HGSE News. Retrieved February 15, 2008 from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/larry10012000_page1.html.
  30. Ziv A., Green D., Guttman J. (1978) Moral judgment: Differences between city, kibbutz, and Israeli Arab preadolescents on the realistic-relativistic dimension. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 9: 215–226. doi: 10.1177/002202217892008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ziv A., Shani A., (1975) Differences in moral judgment of the adolescents educated in Israel and in the Soviet Union. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 6: 108–121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations