Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 141–169

Effects of classroom context on university students’ judgments about cheating: mediating and moderating processes

  • Tamera Burton Murdock
  • Angela D. Miller
  • Amy Goetzinger
Article

Abstract

Hypothetical vignettes were used to examine the effects of classroom context variables (pedagogical quality and classroom goal structure) on undergraduate (study 1) and graduate (study 2) students’ judgments about cheating. Consistent with attribution theory and previous findings, poor (versus good) pedagogy and performance (versus mastery) goals structures resulted in more teacher blame and less student blame for cheating, and cheating was rated as more acceptable and more likely in these situations. Participants’ own prior cheating history but not their experience as a classroom teacher also affected these judgments. Relations between classroom context variables and assigned blame for cheating were mediated by students’ assessments of the fairness of the classroom situation.

Keywords

cheating neutralizing attitudes classroom effects attributions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 261–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderman, E.M. (2007). The effects of personal, classroom and school goal structures on academic cheating. In E.M. Anderman & T.B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderman E.M., Griesinger T., Westerfield G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology 90: 84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderman E.M., Midgley C. (2004). Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 499–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbuckle, J.L. (2003) Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. Chicago IL: Smallwaters Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Bolin A.U. (2004). Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 138: 101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruggeman E.L., Hart K.J. (1996). Cheating, lying, and moral reasoning by religious and secular high school students. Journal of Educational Research 89: 340–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Covington M.V., Omelich C.L. (1984). Task-oriented versus competitive learning structures: Motivational and performance consequences. Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 1038–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daniel L.G. (1991). Academic misconduct among teacher education students: A descriptive-correlational study. Research in Higher Education 32: 703–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniel L.G. et al. (1994). Academic misconduct among nursing students: A multivariate investigation. Journal of Professional Nursing 10: 278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans E.D., Craig D. (1990). Teacher and student perceptions of academic cheating in middle and senior high schools. Journal of Educational Research 84: 44–52Google Scholar
  12. Greitemeyer T., Weiner W. (2003). Assymetrical attributions for approach versus avoidance behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 1371–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guttmann J. (1984). Cognitive morality and cheating behavior in religious and secular school children. Journal of Educational Research 77: 249–254Google Scholar
  14. Haines V.J., Diekhoff G.M., LaBeff E.E., Clark R.E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education 25: 342–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen L.A., Arnett J.J., Feldman S., Cauffman E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: Academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology 27: 209–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jordan A.E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behavior 11: 233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaplan A., Gheen M., Midgley C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology 72: 191–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karabenick, S.A., & Wooley, M. (2006). The role of cognitive validity in the construct validation of motivation-related assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  19. LaBeff E.E., Clark R.E., Haines V.J., Diekhoff G.M. (1990). Situational ethics and college student cheating. Sociological Inquiry 60: 190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCabe D.L., Trevino L.K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education 38: 379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K., & Butterfield, K.D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 219.Google Scholar
  22. Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hruada, L.Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K.E., Gheen, M., Kaplan.A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M.J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R., & Urdan, T. (2000). Patterns of adaptive learning survey (PALS) manual. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  23. Midgley C. (ed). (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  24. Murdock T.B. (1999). The social context of risk: Status and motivational predictors of alienation in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 62–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murdock T.B., Anderman E.M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist 41: 129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murdock T.B., Anderman L.H., Hodge S.A. (2000). Middle-grade predictors of students’ motivation and behavior in high school. Journal of Adolescent Research 15: 327–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murdock T.B., Hale N.M., Weber M.J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology 26: 96–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murdock, T.B., Miller, A., & Anderman, E.M. (2006). Do differences in classroom context really explain rates of cheating?: An HLM analysis. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  29. Murdock T.B., Miller A., Kohlhardt J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students’ judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology 96: 765–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murdock, T.B., & Stephens, J. (2007). Is cheating wrong? Students’ reasoning about academic dishonesty. In E.M. Anderman & T.B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Patrick, H. (2004). Reexaming mastery goal strucutres. In P.R. Pintrich & M.L. Maehr (Eds.), Motivating students, improving schools: Essays in honor of Carol Midgley, (Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 13). New York: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  32. Perkins H.W. (2002). Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. Journal of Alcohol Studies 14: 164–172Google Scholar
  33. Perry A.R., Kane K.M., Bemesser K.J., Spicker P.T. (1990). Type A behavior, achievement striving, and cheating among college students. Psychological Reports 66(2): 459–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pulvers K., Diekhoff G.M. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education 40: 487–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan A.M., Pintrich P.R., Midgley C. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why?. Educational Psychology Review 13(2): 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith J.N., Nolan R.F., Dai Y. (1998). Faculty perceptions of student academic honesty. College Student Journal 32: 305–310Google Scholar
  37. Thorkildsen T.A., Nolen S.B., Fournier J. (1994). What is fair? Children’s critiques of practices that influence motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Turiel E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. New York, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Urdan T. (2004). Using multiple methods to assess students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures. European Psychologist 9: 222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Urdan T.C., Kneisel L., Mason V. (1999). Interpreting messages about motivation in the classroom: Effects of classroom goal structures. In Urdan T.C. (ed). Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 11). Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, pp. 123–158Google Scholar
  41. Weiner B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, Guilford PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Weiner B., Amirkhan J., Folkes V.S., Verette J.A. (1987). An attributional analysis of excuse giving: Studies of a naive theory of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52(2): 316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weiner B., Figueroa-Munoz A., Kakihara C. (1991). The goals of excuses and communication strategies related to causal perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whitley B.E. Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education 39: 235–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamera Burton Murdock
    • 1
  • Angela D. Miller
    • 2
  • Amy Goetzinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational and Counseling PsychologyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations