The Birth of a New Paradigm: Rethinking Education and School Leadership with a Metamodern ‘Lens’
Metamodernism, which is used synonymous with post-postmodernism or neo-modernism, has come forward in response to postmodernism and the emerged crises, instabilities, and uncertainties in all areas of this epoch. Metamodernism is a perspective situated epistemologically with (post)modernism, ontologically between (post)modernism and historically beyond (post)modernism. It seeks an oscillation between modernism and postmodernism with mediating between them and responding to existing cultural modes. Thus, metamodernism is a paradigm beyond modernism and postmodernism, trying to explain today’s cultural and intellectual developments which are not sufficiently criticized by modernism nor postmodernism. This paper questions and discusses the understanding of this paradigm and its reflections on education, school leadership, and schooling in the Nordic countries. By reviewing education related reports, survey reports, books and articles about these countries, comprehending their philosophy of education throughout the years, and analyzing the ongoing educational developments, the main notion of metamodernism and its influences on schooling, leadership implications, classroom activities and research in education are focused on this paper.
KeywordsMetamodernism Paradigm shift Changing schools School leadership Nordic education system
- Anderson, V.N., and I. Helgøy. 2007. Education reforms in Denmark and Norway: Restricting or enhancing the role of the state and the professions in education governance. Workshop 11, Reforming education policy: Internalisation-privatisation- governance, Helsinki Joint Session, 7–12 May. https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/899c7405-7755-4fd9-a787-dcef691e84a5.pdf.
- Andreasson, U., and M. Lundqvist. 2018. Nordic leadership. Denmark: Rosendahls.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. 2000. What is globalization?. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, A., M. Cummins, A. Freeman, and K. Rose. 2017. 2017 NMC technology outlook for Nordic Schools: A horizon project regional report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Bishop, J., and M. Verleger. 2013. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference. Atlanta, GA: ASEE.Google Scholar
- Bolman, L.G., and T.E. Deal. 2000. People and organisation. In The Jossey–Bass reader on: Educational leadership, ed. M. Fullan, 59–69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Bottia, M.C., E. Stearns, R.A. Mickelson, S. Moller, and A.D. Parker. 2015. The relationships among high school STEM learning experiences and students’ intent to declare and declaration of a STEM majör in college. Teachers College Record 117(3): 1–46.Google Scholar
- Bourriaud, N. 2009. Altermodern: Tate Triennial 2009. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Digital Economy and Society Index [DESI]. 2019. The Digital Economy and Society Index 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi.
- Dumitrescu, A. 2014. Towards a metamodern literature (Doctoral dissertation). https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/4925/DumitrescuAlexandra2014PhD.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y.
- Eguchi, A. 2014. Robotics as a learning tool for educational transformation. In Proceedings of 4th International Workshop Teaching Robotics, Teaching with Robotics & 5th International Conference Robotics in Education, Padova (Italy), 18 July. Retrieved from https://www.robolab.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/00_WFr1_04.pdf.
- Esping-Andersen, G. 1996. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon, trans. C. Gordon, L. Marshal, J. Mepham & K: Sober. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, J.A. 2017. “It takes a village”—(Catholic) education in the 21st century. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 241–254. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Giroux, H.A. 1983. Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
- Gronn, P. 2011. Hybrid configurations of leadership. In The SAGE handbook of leadership, ed. A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, and M. Uhl-Bien, 437–454. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Goldin, C., and L.F. Katz. 2008. The race between education and technology. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Helliwell, J.F., H. Huang, and S. Wang. 2019. Changing world happiness. In World Happiness Report 2019, Chp 2, ed. J.F. Helliwell, R. Layard, and J.D. Sachs, 11–46. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
- Imsen, G., U. Blossing, and L. Moos. 2017. Reshaping the Nordic education model in an era of efficiency Changes in the comprehensive school Project in Denmark since the millennium. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 61(5): 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kirby, A. 2009. Digimodernism: How new technologies dismantle the postmodern and reconfigure our culture. New York, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Kontio, K., E. Pikkarainen, and P. Siljander. 2017. A modern idea of the school. In Schools in transition: Linking past, present, and future in educational practice, ed. P. Siljander, K. Kontio, and E. Pikkarainen, 1–18. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lipovetsky, G. 2005. Hypermodern times. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Mannay, D. 2016. Visual, narrative and creative research methods: Applications, reflection and ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Maxcy, S.J. 1994. Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Møller, J. (2018). Scandinavian approaches to school leadership. In Invited Presentation at the International Conference Improving School Leadership, Copenhagen, 14–15 April. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/40553301.pdf.
- Mortimore, P. 2013. Peter Mortimore: Nordic leadership: Something worth keeping. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic Model? (Forewords, pp. vi–viii). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Moore, M.G., and G. Kearsley. 2012. Distance education: A systems view of online learning, 3rd ed. USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Mumby, D.K. 1997. Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication Theory 7: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Niemi, H. 2017. What is evidence required for and who generates that evidence in the Finnish education system? In Evidence and public good in educational policy, research, and practice (Educational Governance Research, vol. 6, ed. M.Y. Eryaman and B. Schneider, 43–62. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pantelidis, V.S. 2009. Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education 2(1–2): 59–70.Google Scholar
- Reichenbach, R. 2010. Die Effizienz der Bildungssysteme und die Sinnkrise des schulischen Lernens. In Schule zwischen Effizienzkriterien und Sinnfragen, ed. J. Warwas and D. Sembill, 1–16. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.Google Scholar
- Rudrum, D., and N. Stavris. 2015. Introduction. In Supplanting the postmodern: An anthology of writings on the arts and culture of the early 21st century (np), ed. D. Rudrum and N. Stavis. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Sahlberg, P. 2015. Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Salminen, J., L. Tornberg, and P. Venäläinen. 2016. Public institutions as learning environments in Finland. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 253–266. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Samuels, R. 2008. Auto-modernity after postmodernism: Autonomy and automation in culture, technology, and education. In Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected, ed. T. McPherson, 219–240. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Shwab, K. 2016. The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
- Sheninger, E. 2014. Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
- Sigurðardóttir, H.D.I. 2016. Concern, creativity and compliance: The phenomenon of digital game-based learning in Norwegian Education (Ph.D. dissertation). Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
- Slavin, R., S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R.H. Lazarowitz, C. Webb, and R. Schumuck. 2013. Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.Google Scholar
- Takeuchi, L.M., and S. Vaala. 2014. Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame.Google Scholar
- Turner, L. 2011. The metamodernist manifesto. Retrieved from http://www.metamodernism.org.
- World Economic Forum. 2017. The Global Human Capital Report 2017: Preparing people for the future of work. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Human_Capital_Report_2017.pdf.
- Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S., and H. Kynäslahti. 2016. ICTs in a school‘s everyday life—Developing the educational use of ICTs in Finnish schools of the future. In Miracle of Education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, ed. H. Niemi, A. Toom, and A. Kallioniemi, 241–252. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van den Akker, R., A. Gibbons, and T. Vermeulen. 2017. Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum. 2017. The global human capital report 2017: Preparing people for the future of work. Switzerland: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar