Analysing the Matter Flows in Schools Using Deleuze’s Method

  • David R. ColeEmail author


Using Deleuzian theory for educational research and practice has become an increasingly popular activity (e.g., Cole 2011). However, there are many theoretical complexities to the straightforward application of Deleuze to the educational context. For example, the ‘new materialism’ that Deleuze refers to in the 1960s takes its inspiration from Spinoza, and is an emancipatory (and very human) project. Contrariwise, the ‘new materialism’ of the present moment is frequently applied to educational research and practice specifically as a way out of anthropocentric limits and enclosure. This paper explores the combined forces of humanism and naturalism which are at work in Deleuze’s ‘new materialism’, as type of ‘more-than-human’ emancipation method derived from Bergson and Nietzsche; it is a mode of overcoming human limits, which fully takes into account the connections to and with the non-human world and the ecological consequences of human action. This paper will draw out the specific consequences for educational research and practice in schools of the ‘vitalist-nihilism’ we may derive from Bergson and Nietzsche to analyse matter flows as they enter, mingle with, and exit schools.


Vitalism Nihilism Deleuze Bergson Nietzsche New materialism Educational theory and practice Matter flows 



  1. Barad, K. 2003. Posthuman performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women and Society 28(3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergson, H. 1935. The two sources of morality and religion (trans: Audra, R.A., and Brereton, C.). London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bergson, H. 1965. The creative mind (trans: Andison, M.L.). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, H. 1988. Matter and memory (trans: Paul, N.M., and Palmer, W.S.). New York: Zone Books. Original published 1888.Google Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, D.R. 2011. Educational life-forms: Deleuzian teaching and teaching practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole, D.R. 2013. Traffic jams: Analysing everyday life using the immanent materialism of Deleuze and Guattari. New York: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  8. Cole, D.R. 2014. Capitalised education: An immanent materialist account of Kate Middleton. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, D.R., and P. Hager. 2010. Learning-practice: The ghosts in the education machine. Education Inquiry 1(1): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole, D.R., and M. Mirzaei Rafe. 2017. Conceptual ecologies for educational research through Deleuze, Guattari and Whitehead. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 30(9): 849–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, D.R., and M. Mirzaei Rafe. 2018. Positioning whitehead as a mean to enhance social justice in education. Interchange 49(3): 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole, D.R., and P. Throssell. 2008. Epiphanies in action: Teaching and learning in synchronous harmony. The International Journal of Learning 15(7): 175–184.Google Scholar
  13. Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. Introducing the new materialisms. In New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics, ed. D. Coole and S. Frost, 1–47. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G. 1983. Nietzsche and philosophy (trans: Tomlinson, H.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G. 1988a. Spinoza. Practical philosophy (trans: Hurley, R.). San Francisco: City Light Books.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G. 1988b. Bergsonism (trans: Tomlinson, H.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, G. 1992. Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza (trans: Joughin, M.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  18. Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition (trans: Patton, P.). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  19. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (trans: Hurley, R., Steen, M., and Lane, H.R.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  20. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1988. A thousand plateaus: Schizophrenia and capitalism (trans: Massumi, B.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  21. Grosz, E. 2011. Life, matter, and other variations. Philosophy Today 55: 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grosz, E. 2015. Deleuze and the Nonhuman Turn: An interview with Elizabeth Grosz. In Deleuze and the non/human, ed. J. Roffe and H. Stark, 17–25. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Guattari, F. 1996. The three ecologies. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  24. Guattari, F. 2016. Lines of flight: For another world of possibilities (trans: Goffey, A.). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  25. Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (trans: Stambaugh, J.). Albany, NY: SUNY press.Google Scholar
  26. Kant, I. 2004. Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to any future metaphysics: That will be able to come forward as science: With selections from the critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Le Guin, U. 1971. The lathe of heaven. London: Orion Books.Google Scholar
  29. Marx, K. 1887. Capital: A critique of political economy. Volume I. Book one: The process of production of capital (trans: Moore, S., and Aveling, E., ed.: Engels, F.). Moscow, USSR: Progress Publishers. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
  30. Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1969/1848. Manifesto of the communist party. In Selected works, vol. 1, ed. K Marx and F. Engels, pp. 98–137. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
  31. Newell, P., and M. Paterson. 2010. Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nietzsche, F. 1974. The gay science: With a prelude in rhymes and an appendix of songs (trans: Kaufmann, W.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  33. Semetsky, I. 2011. Re-symbolization of the self. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sokolowski, R. 2000. Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Stengers, I. 2009. Thinking with Deleuze and Whitehead: A double test. In Deleuze, Whitehead, Bergson: Rhizomatic connections, ed. K. Robinson, 28–44. Chicago: University of South Dakota.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whitehead, A.N. 1967. Science and the modern world. New York, NY: The Free Press. Originally published in 1925.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations