Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 71–84 | Cite as

Troubling Hope: Performing Inventive Connections in Discomforting Times

  • Zofia ZaliwskaEmail author
  • Megan Boler


In what follows, we revisit the most promising conceptions of “hope” while following Haraway’s admonition to “stay with the trouble.” Thirty-five years after Haraway’s (1991) opening to the Manifesto for Cyborgs where she states that “irony is about contradictions that do not resolve into larger wholes” (p. 149), we move with her ceaseless task to eschew resolution and certainty, urging instead a radical contingency that is fundamental to thought itself. The radical contingency recognizes the limits of what any one individual or one species is capable of unto itself. Any such exceptionalism is spurned. The possibilities of thinking-with, and making-with, are the necessary path of the troubled present. And there is no escaping the present, a present that is thick with affliction but is still unfinished and ongoing. We enter into the thick presence of our ongoing conversation around hope by revisiting the concepts that help us to think our thoughts, exploring how these conceptions worked and did not work for our collective thinking. We then build on the concepts’ appendages, their attachments and detachments to our conversation around hope, by sketching Haraway’s materialist challenge to hope (and despair), and her refusal of futurism and contingency that raise some questions about the potentialities of “critical hope.” Finally, we situate our work within an understanding of the “pedagogical work of the concept,” drawing a line from Haraway to Stengers to Deleuze, which allows us to explore resonance between concepts and posit a “pedadogy of the concept” to situate the limits of hope and potentialities of “staying with the trouble.” To work towards a pedagogy that “stays with the trouble,” we extend Haraway’s critique that it matters “what thoughts think thoughts” by suggesting that it also matters which feelings we feel with, highlighting the vital necessity of feeling to the project of staying with the trouble.


Haraway Critical hope Feminist new materialism Pedagogy of discomfort 


  1. Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlant, L. 2010. Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boler, M. 1999. Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Boler, M. 2004. Teaching for hope: The ethics of shattering world views. In Teaching, learning and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice, ed. D. Liston and J. Garrison, 117–131. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braidotti, R. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Colebrook, C. 2010. Deleuze and the meaning of life. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari 1994. What is philosophy? (trans: H. Tomlison, G. Burchell). New York, NY: Columbia University Press (original work published 1991).Google Scholar
  8. Freire, P. 1992. Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sartre, J. P. 1984. Being and nothingness (trans: H.E. Barnes). New York, NY: Washington Square Press (original work published in 1943).Google Scholar
  11. Smith, D., and J. Protevi. Gilles Deleuze. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 18 Nov 2017.
  12. Webb, D. 2013. Pedagogies of hope. Studies in Philosophy and Education 32(4): 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zournazi, M. 2002. Hope: New philosophies for change. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations