Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 95–111 | Cite as

The Ethics and Politics of Precarity: Risks and Productive Possibilities of a Critical Pedagogy for Precarity

  • Michalinos ZembylasEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses Butler’s theory on the possibility of precarity to serve as the nexus of ethical relations, while also exploring some of the pitfalls of her theorization to reconceptualize the pedagogical implications of a critical pedagogy for precarity. In particular, the paper asks: How can precarity—understood as an ambivalent concept, as a paradoxical nexus of both possibilities and constraints—function pedagogically in a way that challenges its moralization? How can educators engage with precarity in ways that ‘re-frame’ it so that both the dangers and prospects of ethics and politics of precarity are properly acknowledged and critically interrogated in pedagogical practice? The risks and possibilities of a critical pedagogy for precarity are addressed, highlighting that there are several complexities involved as much as there are opportunities for ethical transformation and political action in school and beyond.

Keywords

Judith Butler Precarity Critical pedagogy for precarity Ethics Politics 

References

  1. Applebaum, B. 2012. Reframing responsibility in the social justice classroom. Race Ethnicity and Education 15 (5): 615–631.Google Scholar
  2. Applebaum, B. 2017. Comforting discomfort as complicity: White fragility and the pursuit of invulnerability. Hypatia 32 (4): 862–875.Google Scholar
  3. Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bolant, T. 2007. Critique as a technique of self: A Butlerian analysis of Judith Butler’s prefaces. History of the Human Sciences 20 (3): 105–122.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. 1988. Acts of resistance: Against the tyranny of the market. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, W. 2005. Edgework: Critical essays on knowledge and politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brunila, K., and L.-M. Rossi. 2018. Identity politics, the ethos of vulnerability, and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (3): 287–298.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, J. 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. 2004a. What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In The Judith Butler reader, ed. S. Salih, 302–322. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. 2004b. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war: When life is grievable. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. 2011. Is Judaism Zionsim? In The power of religion in the public sphere, ed. J. Butler, E. Mendieta, and J. VanAntwerpen, 70–91. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Butler, J. 2012. Precarious life, vulnerability, and the ethics of cohabitation. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26 (2): 134–151.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, J. 2016. Rethinking vulnerability and resistance. In Vulnerability in resistance, ed. J. Butler, Z. Gambetti, and L. Sabsay, 12–27. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Butler, J., and A. Athanasiou. 2013. Dispossession: The performative in the political. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, J., Z. Gambetti, and L. Sabsay. 2016. Introduction. In Vulnerability in resistance, ed. J. Butler, Z. Gambetti, and L. Sabsay, 1–11. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cole, A. 2016. All of us are vulnerable, but some are more vulnerable than others: The political ambiguity of vulnerability studies, an ambivalent critique. Critical Horizons 17 (2): 260–277.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, J. 2016. Common bodies. Angelaki 21 (2): 3–15.Google Scholar
  19. Coppock, V., and M. McGovern. 2014. ‘Dangerous minds’? Deconstructing counter-terrorism discourse, radicalisation and the ‘psychological vulnerability’ of Muslim children and young people in Britain. Children and Society 28: 242–256.Google Scholar
  20. Das, V. 2016. The boundaries of the “we”: Cruelty, responsibility and forms of life. Critical Horizons 17 (2): 168–185.Google Scholar
  21. De Vos, J. 2012. Psychologization in times of globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. De Vos, J. 2015. Deneurologizing education? From psychologisation to neurologisation and back. Studies in Philosophy and Education 34: 279–295.Google Scholar
  23. Ecclestone, K. 2011. Emotionally vulnerable subjects and new inequalities: the educational implications of an ‘epistemology of the emotions’. International Studies in Sociology of Education 21 (2): 91–113.Google Scholar
  24. Ecclestone, K. 2012. From emotional and psychological well-being to character education: Challenging policy discourses of behavioral science and ‘vulnerability’. Research Papers in Education 27 (4): 463–480.Google Scholar
  25. Ecclestone, K., and K. Brunila. 2015. Governing emotionally vulnerable subjects and ‘therapization’ of social justice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 23 (4): 485–506.Google Scholar
  26. Ecclestone, K., and D. Goodley. 2016. Political and educational springboard or straitjacket? Theorizing post/human subjects in an age of vulnerability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (2): 175–188.Google Scholar
  27. Ecclestone, K., and D. Hayes. 2009. The dangerous rise of therapeutic education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Ferrarese, E. 2016. Vulnerability: A concept with which to undo the world as is? Critical Horizons 17 (2): 149–159.Google Scholar
  29. Fineman, M. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  30. Fisher, J. 2011. “The walking wounded”: Youth, public education, and the turn to precarious pedagogy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 33 (5): 379–432.Google Scholar
  31. Gilson, E. 2011. Vulnerability, ignorance, and oppression. Hypatia 26 (2): 308–332.Google Scholar
  32. Gilson, E. 2014. The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Gilson, E. 2016. Vulnerability and vitctimization: Rethinking key concepts in feminist discourses on sexual violence. Signs 42 (1): 71–98.Google Scholar
  34. Hafiz, A. 2017. Precarity as resistance and cultural solidarity: A critical pedagogy for exploitative flexibilization. Prism: Casting New Light on Learning, Theory and Practice 1 (1): 97–123.Google Scholar
  35. Hekman, S. 2014. Vulnerability and ontology. Australian Feminist Studies 29 (82): 452–464.Google Scholar
  36. Held, V. 1987. Non-contractual society. In Science, morality and feminist theory, ed. M. Hanen and K. Nielsen, 111–137. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  37. Honig, B. 2010. Antigone’s two laws: Greek tragedy and the politics of humanism. New Literary History 41 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
  38. Honig, B. 2013. Antigone interrupted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Horton, J., and P. Kraftl. 2009. Small acts, kind words and “not too much fuss”: Implicit activisms. Emotion, Space and Society 2: 14–23.Google Scholar
  40. Kittay, E. 1999. Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Lloyd, M.S. 2015. The ethics and politics of vulnerable bodies. In Butler and ethics, ed. M.S. Lloyd, 167–192. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mackenzie, C., W. Rogers, and S. Dodds. 2014. Introduction: What is vulnerability and why does it matter for moral theory. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. C. Mackenzie, W. Rogers, and S. Dodds, 1–29. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Madsen, J. 2014. The therapeutic turn: How psychology altered western culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. McCormack, D., and S. Salmenniemi. 2016. The biopolitics of precarity and the self. European Journal of Cultural Studies 19 (1): 3–15.Google Scholar
  45. McLaughlin, K. 2011. Surviving identity: Vulnerability and the psychology of recognition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Michel, N. 2016. Accounts of injury as misappropriations of race: Towards a critical black politics of vulnerability. Critical Horizons 17 (2): 240–259.Google Scholar
  47. Millar, K.M. 2017. Towards a critical politics of precarity. Sociology Compass 11 (6): 1–11.Google Scholar
  48. Puar, J. 2012. Precarity talk: A virtual roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejić, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Puar, and Ana Vujanović. TDR: The Drama Review 56 (4): 163–177.Google Scholar
  49. Rancière, J. 2010. The ethical turn in politics and aesthetics. In Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics, ed. S. Corcoran, 184–202. New York: Continuum Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  50. Rogers, W., C. Mackenzie, and S. Dodds. 2012. Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2): 11–38.Google Scholar
  51. Ruti, M. 2017. The ethics of precarity: Judith Butler’s reluctant universalism. In Remains of the social: Desiring the post-apartheid, ed. M. Donker, R. Truscott, G. Minkley, and P. Lalu, 92–116. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sabsay, L. 2016. Permeable bodies: Vulnerability, affective powers, hegemony. In Vulnerability in resistance, ed. J. Butler, Z. Gambetti, and L. Sabsay, 278–302. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Standing, G. 2011. The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  54. Tinning, K. 2018. Vulnerability as a key concept in museum pedagogy on difficult matters. Studies in Philosophy and Education 37: 147–165.Google Scholar
  55. Zembylas, M. 2013. The ‘crisis of pity’ and the radicalization of solidarity: Towards critical pedagogies of compassion. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association 49: 504–521.Google Scholar
  56. Zembylas, M. 2014. Theorizing ‘difficult knowledge’ in the aftermath of the ‘affective turn’: Implications for curriculum and pedagogy in handling traumatic representations. Curriculum Inquiry 44 (3): 390–412.Google Scholar
  57. Zembylas, M. 2016a. Toward a critical-sentimental orientation in human rights education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (11): 1151–1167.Google Scholar
  58. Zembylas, M. 2016b. The therapization of social justice as an emotional regime: Towards a politics of vulnerability in critical education. Journal of Professional Capital and Community 1 (4): 286–301.Google Scholar
  59. Zembylas, M. 2018a. Counter-conducts as affective practices in the classroom: The task of pedagogies of estrangement. Teaching Education 29 (1): 98–110.Google Scholar
  60. Zembylas, M. 2018b. Political depression, cruel optimism and pedagogies of reparation: Questions of criticality and affect in human rights education. Critical Studies in Education 59 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
  61. Zembylas, M. 2018c. Affect, race, and white discomfort in schooling: Decolonial strategies for ‘pedagogies of discomfort’. Ethics and Education 13 (1): 86–104.Google Scholar
  62. Žižek, S. 2004. A plea for ethical violence. The Bible and Critical Theory 1 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  63. Žižek, S. 2008. Violence: Six sideways reflections. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open University of CyprusLatsiaCyprus
  2. 2.Nelson Mandela University (NMU)Port ElizabethSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations