Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 57–69 | Cite as

‘How to Write as Felt’ Touching Transmaterialities and More-Than-Human Intimacies

  • Stephanie SpringgayEmail author


In this paper, I invoke various matterings of felt in order to generate a practice of writing that engenders bodily difference that is affective, moving, and wooly. In attending to ‘how to write as felt,’ as a touching encounter, I consider how human and nonhuman matter composes (Haraway in Staying with the trouble: making Kin in the Chthulucene, Duke University Press, Durham, 2016). This co-mingling that felt performs enacts what Alaimo (Bodily natures: science, environment, and the material self, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 2010; Exposed: Environmental politics and pleasures in posthuman times, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2016) calls transcorporeality. Connecting felt with theories of touch and transcorporeality becomes a way to open up and re-configure different bodily imaginaries, both human and nonhuman, that are radically immanent and intensive; as an assemblage of forces and flows that open bodies to helices and trans connections (Springgay and Truman in Body Soc 23(4):27–58, 2017b). My contribution to this collection on ‘humanity in a posthuman age’ is experimental and performative. Felt is activated not as a metaphor but rather poses questions about what writing does at the interstices between research and creation.


Felt Transmateriality Transcorporeality Touch Research-creation Writing 



Funding for this research is from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Canada.


  1. Ahmed, S. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Alaimo, S. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alaimo, S. 2016. Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Half Way: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barad, K. 2012. On Touching—The Inhuman That Therefore I Am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 23 (3): 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barad, K. 2015. Transmaterialities: Trans*/Matter/Realities and Queer Political Imaginings. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 21 (2–3): 387–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackman, L. 2012. Immaterial Bodies: Affect, Embodiment, Mediation. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, M.Y. 2012. Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J.J. 2015. Stone: An Ecology of the Inhuman. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colebrook, C. 2015. What Is It Like to be a Human? TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 2 (2): 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collard, R., J. Dempsy, and J. Sundberg. 2015. A Manifesto for Abundant Futures. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2): 322–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cvetkovich, A. 2003. An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deleuze, G. (1953–1974). Desert Islands and OTHER texts. Retrieved April 2015
  15. Deleuze, G. 1993. The Fold. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Freccero, C. 2011. Carnivorous Virility, or Becoming Dog. Social Text 106 29 (1): 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the CHTHULUCENE. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hustak, C., and N. Myers. 2012. Involutionary Momentum: Affective Ecologies and the Sciences of Plant/Insect Encounters. Differences 23 (3): 74–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson, Z.I. 2013. Animal: New Directions in the Theorization of Race and Posthumanism. Feminist Studies 39 (3): 669–685.Google Scholar
  22. King, T.L. 2017. Humans Involved: Lurking in the Lines of Posthumanist Flight. Critical Ethnic Studies Journal 3 (1): 162–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lather, P., and E.A. St. Pierre. 2013. Post-qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 629–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Livingstone, J., and J. Puar. 2011. Interspecies. Social Text 106 29 (1): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maclure, M. 2013. The Wonder of Data. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies 13 (4): 228–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Manning, E. 2007. Politics of Touch: Sense, Movement, Sovereignty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Manning, E. (2012). Always More than One: Individuation's Dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manning, E. 2016. The Minor Gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manning, E., and B. Massumi. 2014. Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miner, D. forthcoming/2019. Mawadisidiwag miinawaa Wiidanokiindiwag//They Visit and Work Together. In Makers, Crafters, Educators: Working for Social Change, eds., E. Garber, L. Hochtritt, and M. Sharma. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. O’Grady, A. (2017). Swimming Lessons a Developing a Water Pedagogy to Examine the Entangled, Material, and Intra-Active Enmeshments Between Water, Bodies, and Knowledges. Unpublished Masters Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  32. Parker, R. 2010. The Subversive Stitch. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  33. Puar, J. 2009. Prognosis Time: Towards a Geopolitics of Affect, Debility and Capacity. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 19 (2): 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogoff, I. 2008. What is a Theorist? In The State of Art Criticism, ed. J. Elkins and M. Newman. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Rotas, N., and S. Springgay. 2014. How Do You Make a Classroom Operate Like a Work of Art? Deleuzeguattarian Methodologies of Research-Creation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 28 (5): 552–572.Google Scholar
  36. Serres, M. 1991. The Book of Foundations. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  37. Spady, Sam. 2017. Reflections on Late Identity: In Conversation with Melanie J. Newton, Nirmala Erevelles, Kim TallBear, Rinaldo Walcott, and Dean Itsuji Saranillio. Journal of the Critical Ethnic Studies Association 3 (1): 90–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Springgay, S. 2008. Body Knowledge and Curriculum: Pedagogies of Touch in Youth and Visual Culture. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  39. Springgay, S. 2011. “The Chinatown Foray” as Sensational Pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry 41: 636–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Springgay, S. 2013a. How to be an Artist by Night: Critical Public Pedagogy and Double Ontology. In Problematizing Public Pedagogy Handbook, ed. J. Sandlin, M. O’Malley, and J. Burdick, 133–148. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Springgay, S. 2013b. The Pedagogical Impulse: Aberrant Residencies and Classroom Ecologies. C Magazine for Art and Culture.Google Scholar
  42. Springgay, S. 2014. Approximate-Rigorous-Abstractions: Propositions of Activation for Posthumanist Research. In Posthumanism and Educational Research, ed. N. Snaza and J. Weaver, 76–90. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Springgay, S. 2015. Working with Children as Pedagogies of Refusal. In Multiple Elementary, ed. H. Jickling and H. Reed, 64–68. Toronto: YYZ Books.Google Scholar
  44. Springgay, S. 2016a. Towards a Rhythmic Account of Working Together and Taking Part. Research in Education 96 (1): 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Springgay, S. 2016b. Meditating with Bees: Weather Bodies and a Pedagogy of Movement. In Pedagogical Matters: New Materialism and Curriculum Studies, ed. N. Snaza, D. Sonu, S.E. Truman, and Z. Zaliwska, 59–74. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  46. Springgay, S., and S.E. Truman. 2017a. On the Need for Methods Beyond Proceduralism: Speculative Middles, (In)tensions, and Response-Ability in Research. Qualitative Inquiry 24 (3): 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Springgay, S., and S.E. Truman. 2017b. A Transmaterial Approach to Walking Methodologies: Embodiment, Affect, and a Sonic Art Performance. Body & Society. 23 (4): 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Springgay, S., and S.E. Truman. 2017c. Stone Walks: Inhuman Animacies and Queer Archives of Feeling. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (6): 851–863.Google Scholar
  49. Springgay, S., and S.E. Truman. 2018. Walking Methodologies in a More-Than-Human World. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Springgay, S., and Truman, S. E. forthcoming. Queering Temporalities, Activating QTBIPOC Subjectivities and World-Makings: Walking Research-Creation. MAI: Feminist Visual Culture.
  51. St. Pierre, E., 2017. Deleuze and Guattari’s language for new empirical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (11): 1080–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thompson, C. 2011. Felt: Fluxus, Joseph Beuys, and the Dalai Lama. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Todd, Zoe. 2016. An Indigenous Feminist’s Take on the Ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is Just Another Word for Colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29 (1): 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Truman, S.E. 2016. Becoming More Than It Never (Actually) Was: Expressive Writing as Research-Creation. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy 13 (2): 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Truman, S.E., and S. Springgay. 2015. The Primacy of Movement in Research-Creation: New Materialist Approaches to Art Research and Pedagogy. In Art’s Teachings, Teaching’s Art: Philosophical, Critical, and Educational Musings, ed. M. Laverty and T. Lewis, 151–164. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vaccaro, J. 2010. Felt Matters. Women & Performance 20 (3): 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vaccaro, J. 2015. Feelings and Fractals: Woolly Ecologies of Transgender Matter. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 21 (2–3): 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yusoff, K. 2017. Epochal Aesthetics: Affectual Infrastructures of the Anthropocene, vol. 92. New York: E-flux.Google Scholar
  59. Zaliwska, Z. (2017). Untimely Research: Making time as Existential Post-qualitative Research Practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  60. Zaliwska, Z., and S. Springgay. 2015. Diagrams and Cuts: A Materialist Approach to Research-Creation. Cultural Studies, Critical Methodologies 15 (2): 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations