Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 123–146 | Cite as

Adequacy in Education and Normative School Choice

  • Adelin Costin DumitruEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper I make a contribution to three distinct, but deeply interwoven subjects. Firstly, I argue that, at the level of ideal theory, the distribution of educational goods should follow a sufficientarian pattern and that the evaluative space of children’s advantage should be inspired by the capability approach (although with an important twist). Secondly, the paper is delving into the more policy-oriented debates on the desirability of school choice. I argue that, given the non-ideal circumstances in which decision makers have to act, giving parents the opportunity to choose the school for their children is a sine qua non condition for even approaching the ideals of sufficientarian justice. Lastly, I move the discussion on more empirical grounds, advancing a criticism of the Romanian educational legislation. I argue that the sufficiency-constrained school choice system that I envision could solve some of the problems that the Romanian educational system faces today.

Keywords

Adequacy Capability approach Parental rights School choice Romanian educational system 

References

  1. Anderson, E. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics 109 (2): 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. 2004. Rethinking equality of opportunity: Comment on Adam Swift’s How not to be a hypocrite. Theory and Research in Education 2: 99–110.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. 2007. Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective. Ethics 117 (4): 595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apostu, O., Balica, M., Fartuşnic, C., Bogdan, F., Horga, I. and Voinea, L. 2012. Copiii care nu merg la şcoală. O analiză a participării la educaţie în învăţământul primar şi gimnazial. Bucharest: Institutul de Ştiinţe ale Educaţiei [Children who do not attend a schools. An analysis of enrollment in primary and lower secondary education]. Google Scholar
  5. Apostu, O., Balica, M., Fartuşnic, C., Florian, B., Horga, I., Novak, C. and Voinea, L. 2015. Analiza sistemului de învăţământ preuniversitar din România din perspectiva unor indicatori statistici. Politici educaţionale bazate pe date. Bucharest: Editura Universitară [An analysis of the Romanian primary and secondary education. Educational policies based on data].Google Scholar
  6. Archbald, D. 2004. School choice, magnet schools and the liberation model: An empirical study. Sociology of Education 77 (4): 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arneson, R. 1999. Human flourishing versus desire satisfaction. Social Philosophy & Policy 16 (1): 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arneson, R. 2004. Cracked foundations of liberal equality. In Dworkin and his critics, ed. Justine Burley, 79–99. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arneson, R. 2006. Distributive justice and basic capability equality: Good enough is not good enough. In Capabilities equality. Basic issues and problems, ed. Alexander Kaufman, 17–44. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Arneson, R. 2013. From primary goods to capabilities to well-being. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2): 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benbaji, Y. 2006. Sufficiency or priority? European Journal of Philosophy 14 (3): 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brighouse, H., and A. Swift. 2006a. Equality, priority and positional goods. Ethics 116: 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brighouse, H., and A. Swift. 2006b. Parents’ rights and the value of the family. Ethics 117: 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brighouse, H., and A. Swift. 2009a. Educational equality versus educational adequacy: A critique of Anderson and Satz. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2): 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brighouse, H., and A. Swift. 2009b. Legitimate parental partiality. Philosophy & Public Affairs 37 (1): 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brighouse, H., and E. Unterhalter. 2010. Primary goods versus capabilities: Considering the debate in relation to equalities in education. In Capabilities: Handlungsbefahigung und Verwirklichungschance in der Erziehungswissencshaft, ed. Hans-Uwe Otto, and Holger Ziegler. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Brighouse, H., H. Ladd, S. Loeb, and A. Swift. 2016. Educational goods and values: a framework for decision makers. Theory and Research in Education 14: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brighouse, H. 2003a. School choice and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Brighouse, H. 2003b. Educational equality and justice. In A companion to the philosophy of education, ed. Randall Curren, 471–486. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brighouse, H. 2004. What’s wrong with privatising schools? Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (4): 617–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brighouse, H. 2007. Educational justice and socio-economic segregation in schools. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (4): 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Brighouse, H. 2008. Educational equality and varieties of school choice. In School choice. Policies and outcomes. Empirical and philosophical perspectives, ed. Walter Feinberg, and Cristopher Lubienski, 41–61. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Brighouse, H. 2010. Educational equality and school reform. In Educational equality, ed. Graham Haydon, 15–70. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Brighouse, H. 2014. Equality, prioritising the disadvantaged and the new educational landscape. Oxford Review of Education 40 (6): 782–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Buchanan, A. 1990. Justice as reciprocity versus subject-centered justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19 (3): 227–252.Google Scholar
  26. Buchanan, A. 2004. Justice, legitimacy and self-determination. Moral foundations for international law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Callan, E. 2016. Democracy, equal citizenship, and education. Theory and Research in Education 14 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  28. Calvert, J. 2014. Educational equality: Luck egalitarian, pluralist and complex. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (1): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Casal, P. 2007. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics 117 (2): 296–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Clayton, M., and D. Stevens. 2004. School choice and the burdens of justice. Theory and Research in Education 2 (2): 111–126.Google Scholar
  31. Cohen, G.A. 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99 (4): 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cohen, G.A. 2011. Equality of what? On welfare, goods and capabilities. In On the currency of egalitarian justice and other essays in political philosophy, ed. Michael Otsuka, 44–61. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Crisp, Roger. 2006. Reasons and the good. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Curren, R. 2009. Education as a social right in a diverse society. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Cust, K. 1997. A just minimum of health care. Oxford: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  36. Dworkin, R. 2001. Sovereign virtue. The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Dwyer, J. 2003. Children’s rights. In A companion to the philosophy of education, ed. Randall Curren, 443–456. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Elacqua, G. 2012. The impact of school choice and public policy on segregation: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Educational Development 32: 444–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fletcher, G. 2013. A fresh start for the objective-list theory of well-being. Utilitas 25 (2): 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Forster, G. 2016. A win-win solution. The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice: The empirical evidence on school choice.Google Scholar
  41. Freiman, C. 2014. Priority and position. Philosophical Studies 167: 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Friedman, M. 2002 [1962]. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 40th anniversary edition.Google Scholar
  43. Giesinger, J. 2011. Education, fair competition and concern for the worst off. Educational Theory 61 (1): 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gheaus, Anca. 2016. Hikers in flip-flops: Luck egalitarianism, democratic equality and the distribuenda of justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2016: 1–16.Google Scholar
  45. Gutmann, A. 1980. Children, paternalism and education: A liberal argument. Philosophy & Public Affairs 9 (4): 338–358.Google Scholar
  46. Gutmann, A. 1999. Democratic education. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hawley, G. and E. Frankenberg. 2012. Reviving magnet schools: Strengthening a a successful choice option. Civil Rights Project.Google Scholar
  48. Henig, J. 1994. Rethinking school choice. Limits of the market metaphor. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Huseby, R. 2010. Sufficiency restated and defended. The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2): 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Macedo, S. 2003. Equity and school choice: How can we bridge the gap between ideals and realities? In School choice. The moral debate, ed. Alan Wolfe, 51–70. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Macleod, C. 2010. Primary goods, capabilities and children. In Measuring justice. Primary goods and capabilities, ed. Harry Brighouse, and Ingrid Robeyns, 174–193. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Minnow, M. 2003. Parents, partners and choice: constitutional dimensions of school options. In School choice. The moral debate, ed. Alan Wolfe, 217–231. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Miroiu, A. 1998. Managementul învăţământului. In Învăţământul românesc astăzi. Studiu de diagnoză, ed. Adrian Miroiu. Iaşi: Polirom [“The management of education”, in The Romanian educational system].Google Scholar
  54. Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Orr, S. 2005. Sufficiency of resources and political morality. Paper presented at the Priority in Practice seminars, University College London.Google Scholar
  56. Page, E. 2008. Justice between generations: Investigating a sufficientarian approach. Coventry: University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  57. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rawls, J. 1996. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rawls, J. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Reich, R. 2003. Common schooling and educational choice. In A companion to the philosophy of education, ed. Randall Curren, 430–442. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Renzulli, L., and V. Roscigno. 2008. Charter schools and the public good. Schools and society. A sociological approach to education, 363–369. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  63. Rice, C. 2013. Defending the objective list theory of well-being. Ratio 26 (2): 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robeyns, I. 2000. An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? The capability approach re-examined. Center for Economic Studies Discussion Papers. Google Scholar
  65. Robeyns, I. 2003. Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics 9 (2): 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robeyns, I. 2015. The capability approach. Forthcoming in Oxford handbook of distributive justice, ed. Serena Olsaretti. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Saito, M. 2003. Amartya Sen’s capability approach to education: A critical exploration. Journal of Philosophy of Education 37 (1): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sandstrom, M., and F. Bergstrom. 2005. School vouchers in practice: Competition will not hurt you. Journal of Public Economics 89: 351–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Satz, D. 2007. Equality, adequacy and education for citizenship. Ethics 117: 623–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schouten, G. 2012. Fair educational opportunity and the distribution of natural ability: Toward a prioritarian principle of educational justice. Journal of philosophy of Education 46 (3): 472–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sen, A. 1985. Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221.Google Scholar
  72. Sen, A. 1992. Inequality re-examined. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Sen, A. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Shields, L. 2012. The prospects for sufficientarianism. Utilitas 24 (1): 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smrekar, C., and N. Honey. 2015. The desegregation aims and demographic contexts of magnet schools: How parents choose and why siting policies matter. Peabody Journal of Education 90: 128–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stern, M., S. Clonan, L. Jafee, and A. Lee. 2015. The normative limits of choice. Charter schools, disability studies and questions of inclusion. Educational Policy 29 (3): 448–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Swift, A. 2003. How not to be a hypocrite. School choice for the morally perplexed parent. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Swift, A. 2004a. The morality of school choice. Theory and Research in Education 2 (1): 7–21.Google Scholar
  79. Swift, A. 2004b. The morality of school choice reconsidered. A response. Theory and Research in Education 2 (3): 323–342.Google Scholar
  80. Temkin, L. 2003. Egalitarianism defended. Ethics 113: 764–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Teschl, M., and F. Comim. 2005. Adaptive preferences and capabilities: Some preliminary conceptual explorations. Review of Social Economy LXIII (2): 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tooley, J. 1995. Disestablishing the school. De-bunking justifications for state intervention in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Voicu, O. 2012. Alegerea şcolii. O necesară dezbatere de politici educaţionale. Fundaţia pentru o Societate Deschisă din România [“School choice. A necessary educational policy debate”].Google Scholar
  84. Voigt, K. 2007. The harshness objection: Is luck egalitarianism too harsh on the victims of option luck? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4): 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vopat, M. 2011. Magnet schools, innate talent and social justice. Theory and Research in Education 9 (1): 59–72.Google Scholar
  86. Weishart, J. 2014. Transcending equality versus adequacy. Stanford Law Review 66: 477–544.Google Scholar
  87. Woodard, C. 2013. Classifying theories of welfare. Philosophical Studies 165 (3): 787–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Young, I.M. 2006. Taking the basic structure seriously. Perspectives on Politics 4 (1): 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ypi, L. 2010. On the confusion between ideal and non-ideal in recent debates on global justice. Political Studies 58: 536–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of Political Studies and Public AdministrationBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations