Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 47–62 | Cite as

Pedagogy for a Liquid Time

  • Larry Green
  • Kevin GaryEmail author
Article

Abstract

Sociologist Zygmunt Bauman characterizes our time as a time of “liquid modernity” (Bauman in Liquid modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge, 2000). Rather than settled meanings, categories, and frames of reference Bauman contends that meaning is always in flux, open ended rather than closed. Given Bauman’s assessment, pedagogies that are directed towards finding, accepting, or imposing meaning come up short. They offer closed, ‘finished’ meanings instead of an examination of the ongoing, open ended, process of meaning making. What might a pedagogy for a liquid time look like? This is the animating question of this essay. Pedagogically we are interested in this ambiguous space between paradigms of meaning. Rather than resolution or the accommodation and building of new schema (or the acceptance of established schema), we explore the need for constant schema building and renewal—the necessity of living in a state of perpetual emergence. Zygmunt Bauman’s notion of “liquid modernity” suggests that anomalies, rather than exceptions, are the norm; we are living with permanent uncertainty, needing to hold all schemes lightly (Bauman 2000).

Keywords

Liminal Pedagogy Meaning Being Postmodern 

References

  1. Arendt, H. 2010. The human condition, p. 25, as quoted in Stephanie Mackler’s, “Educating in Worldless Times”. Teachers College Record 112: 509–552.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, R. 1977. Roland Barthes. Los Angeles and Berkley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. 2012. From the trailer, “The trouble with being human these days.” Retrieved from Bauman Institute at: http://baumaninstitute.leeds.ac.uk/video/
  4. Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. 1996. Pilgrim to Tourist—or a short history on identity. Questions of cultural identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: dds. Hall S. & Paul du Gay.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U., and J. Willms. 2003. Conversations with Ulrich Beck. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, J. 1972. Ways of seeing. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  8. Biesta, G. 2014. The beautiful risk of education. New York: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  9. Bromberg, P. 2010. Knowing, not-knowing and sort-of-knowing: Psychoanalysis and the experience of uncertainty. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  10. Callahan, R. 1964. Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. 1973. In The philosophy of John Dewey, ed. John J. McDermott. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Erikson, E. 1968. Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  13. Gendlin, E. 1997a. Experiencing and the creation of meaning: A philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gendlin, E. 1997b. “How philosophy cannot appeal to experience, and how it can”, In Language beyond postmodernism: Saying and thinking in Gendlin’s philosophy. Macmillan, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gergen, K. 1992. The decline and fall of personality: Is technology eroding our sense of self? In Psychology Today. New York: Sussex Publishers, LLC.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, M. 1995. Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. 1978. Letter on humanism. In Martin Heidegger: Basic writings, ed. D.F. Krell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Heschel, A. 1977. Man is not alone. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Kline, K.Ovpes. 2011. Toward a post-institutional philosophy of education. Philosophical Studies in Education 43: 10–19.Google Scholar
  20. Milosz, M. 1998. Road-side dog. New York: Farrar; Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  21. Kundera, M. 1984. The unbearable lightness of being. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Marcel, G. 2011. In A Gabriel Marcel reader, ed. B. Sweetman. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mackinlay, S. 2007. Exceeding truth: Jean-Luc Marion’s saturated phenomena. Pacifica 20: 40–51.Google Scholar
  24. Mindell, A. 1987. The dreambody in relationships. New York: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
  25. Noddings, N. 2005. The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education, 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Palmer, P. 1998. The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Rilke, R.M. 1993. Letters to a young poet. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  28. Rilker, R. 1986. Rainer Maria Rilke: Selected Poems. (trans: Fleming, A.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Rorty, R. 1989. Irony, contingency, solidarity, 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sartre, J. P. 1969. Nausea (trans: Alexander, L.). Norfolk, CT: New Directions.Google Scholar
  31. Suzuki, D.T. 1956. In Zen Buddhism: Selected writings of D. T. Suzuki, ed. William Barret. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  32. Westphal, M. 2003. Transfiguration as saturated phenomenon. Journal of Philosophy and Scripture. Retrieved from: http://www.philosophyandscripture.org/Issue1-/Merold_Westphal/merold_westphal.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Valparaiso UniversityValparaisoUSA

Personalised recommendations