Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 451–458 | Cite as

Review of Andrea R. English, Discontinuity in Learning: Dewey, Herbart, and Education as Transformation

Cambridge University Press, 2013
  • Avi I. MintzEmail author
Article

In their influential book, The Child Centered School, Harold Rugg and Ann Schumaker wrote that, in traditional schools, students found “that behind each classroom door lurked a deceptive Pandora’s box of fears, restraints, and long, weary hours of suppression” (Rugg and Shumaker 1928, p. 4). The American child-centered, romantic progressives were known to quip that educators of the old, traditional education did not care what students were taught, as long as students didn’t like it. Isaac Kandel, the longtime critic of child-centered progressivism, retorted that, for progressives, “it does not matter what a student studies, so long as he does like it” (Kandel 1943, p. 49). And so a debate took root about several fundamental educational questions: just how important is it that students enjoy themselves, that they are self-motivated, and that they are interested in what they were doing? What role is left for the curriculum, discipline, and students’ intellectual inheritance? So the...

References

  1. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Boler, M. (2004). Teaching for hope: The ethics of shattering world views. In D. P. Liston & J. W. Garrison (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice (pp. 117–131). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Felman, S., & Laub, D. (1991). Testimony: Crises of witnessing in literature, psychoanalysis, and history. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. James, W. (1899). Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life’s ideals. New York: Dover Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kandel, I. L. (1943). The cult of uncertainty. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Kumashiro, K. K. (2000). Teaching and learning through desire, crisis, and difference: Perverted reflections on anti-oppressive education. Radical Teacher, 58, 6–11.Google Scholar
  8. Kumashiro, K. K. (2002). Troubling education: Queer activism and antioppressive education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  9. Kumashiro, K. K. (2004). Against common sense: Teaching and learning toward social justice. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, J. R. (1992). The schoolhome: Rethinking schools for changing families. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rugg, H., & Shumaker, A. (1928). The child-centered school: An appraisal of the new education. NY and IL: World Book Company.Google Scholar
  13. Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Studies, Henry Kendall College of Arts and SciencesUniversity of TulsaTulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations