Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 25–38 | Cite as

The Concept of Experience by John Dewey Revisited: Conceiving, Feeling and “Enliving”

Article

Abstract

The concept of experience by John Dewey revisited: conceiving, feeling and “enliving”. Dewey takes a few steps towards a differentiation of the concept of experience, such as the distinction between primary and secondary experience, or between ordinary (partial, raw, primitive) experience and complete, aesthetic experience. However, he does not provide a systematic elaboration of these distinctions. In the present text, a differentiation of Dewey’s concept of experience is proposed in terms of feeling, “enliving” (a neologism proposed in this paper) and conceiving. Feeling refers to the basic mode of experience where action, emotion, cognition and communication constitute an original unity. Enliving, aesthetic experience, constitutes the lifeworld, as a person-in-world experience. Even though enliving is holistic and relational, a certain distance emerges between action, emotion and cognition which allows contemplation and choice. Conceiving, on the other hand, refers to the isolating and abstracting understanding of the world with even greater distance between action, emotion and cognition. Such a differentiation provides a clearer understanding of the scope of education. It avoids the risks of regressive tendencies in the concept of experience, and it helps to include conceiving within the realm of experience.

Keywords

Experience John Dewey Aesthetic experience Knowledge 

References

  1. Alexander, T. M. (1987). John Dewey’s theory of art, experience & nature. The horizons of feeling. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). An analysis of some unintended and negative consequences of high-stakes testing. Education Policy Research Unit (EPRU) Education Policy Studies Laboratory.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barthes, R. (1973). Mythologies. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, G. (1970). Steps to an ecology of mind. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Bråten, S. (Ed.). (1998). Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1933). Wesen und Sinn des Spiels. Das Spiel von Mensch und Tier. Berlin: Kurt Wolff Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man: an introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. Later Works. 1935–1953, Vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Later Works, 1935–1953. Vol. 10. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Later Works, 1935–1953, Vol. 13 (pp. 1–63) Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Engler, U. (1992). Kritik der Erfahrung: die Bedeutung der ästhetischen Erfahrung in der Philosophie John Deweys. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann1992. Also: Tübingen Univversität, Thesis.Google Scholar
  13. Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
  14. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  15. Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, M. (1962/1927). Being and time (J. Macquarrie, & E. Robinson, Trans). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Heidegger, M. (1971). The origin of the work of art. In Poetry, language, thought. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Hohr, H. (1993a). Das Märchen aus bildungstheoretischer Sicht. Vol. I: Erkenntnistheoretische und dynamische Aspekte sinnlicher Symbolik; Vol. II: Zur Bedeutungsstruktur im Märchen. PhD-thesis, Norway: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  19. Hohr, H. (1993b). Det normative i folkeeventyret—mellom mytisk regel, moralsk prinsipp og spilleregel. Nordisk Pedagogik, 3, 158–172.Google Scholar
  20. Hohr, H. (2010 a).‘Aesthetic emotion’: an ambiguous concept in John Dewey’s aesthetics. In: Ethics and education. Vol. 5, No. 3, November 1–15.Google Scholar
  21. Hohr, H. (2010 b). The role of emotion in experience—comment on John Dewey’s Art as Experience. In A.-L. Østern & H. Kaihovirta-Rosvik (Eds.) Art education and beyond. Report 28/2010. Vaasa: Faculty of Education at Åbo Akademi University, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
  22. Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals (H. J. Paton Translated and analysed ). New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  23. Karseth, B. (2008). Qualification frameworks for the European Higher Education Area: a new instrumentalism or ‘Much Ado about Nothing’? Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langer, S. K. (1942). Philosophy in a new key. A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  25. Lorenzer, A. (1972). Sprachzerstörung und Rekonstruktion. Vorarbeiten zu einer Metatheorie der Psychoanalyse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  26. Lorenzer, A. (1981). Das Konzil der Buchhalter. Die Zerstörung der Sinnlichkeit. Eine Religionskritik. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  27. Malloch, S. (1999). Mothers and Infants and Communicative Musicality. Special Issue of Musicae Scientiae: Rhythm, Musical Narrative and Origins of Human Communication, pp. 29–57.Google Scholar
  28. Manen, M. v. (1997). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. University of Western Ontario: The Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviourist. Edited and with an introduction by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Translated from the French by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage. How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  32. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  33. Saito, N. (2006). Growth and Perfectionism? Dewey after Emerson and Cavell. In D. T. Hansen (Ed.), John Dewey and our Educational Prospect. A Critical Engagement with Dewey’s Democracy and Education (pp. 81–96) State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schiller, F. (1967). On the Aesthetic education of man in a series of letters (E. M. Wilkinson & L. A. Willough, Eds. and Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sontag, S. (1983). Under the sign of Saturn. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.Google Scholar
  36. Stern, D. N. (2000). The interpersonal world of the infant. A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. With a new introduction by the author. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 15–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the Child. In A. Jolly, K. Sylva, & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Play. Its role in development and evolution (pp. 537–554). Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  39. Welsch, W. (1997). Undoing aesthetics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Zembylas, M., & Fendler, L. (2007). Reframing emotion in education through lenses of parrhesia and care of the self. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26(4), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations