Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 137–152 | Cite as

Discourse and Recognition as Normative Grounds for Radical Pedagogy: Habermasian and Honnethian Ethics in the Context of Education

Article

Abstract

The idea of radical pedagogy is connected to the ideals of social justice and democracy and also to the ethical demands of love, care and human flourishing, an emotional context that is sometimes forgotten in discussions of power and inequality. Both this emotional context and also the emphasis on politics can be found in the writings of Paolo Freire, someone who has provided much inspiration for radical pedagogy over the years. However, Freire did not create any explicit ethical foundation for radical pedagogy. This paper argues that, when constructing normative grounds for radical pedagogy, Habermas’s discourse ethics can be an important source, with the caveat that discourse ethics on its own is not sufficient grounding enough where radical pedagogy is concerned. Habermasian critical theory should be supplemented with Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition, as Freire’s focus on love and human flourishing corresponds well with Honneth’s theory’s three modes of recognition: love, rights and respect (solidarity stemming from mutual relations of respect).

Keywords

Habermas Honneth Disource ethics Recognition Radical pedagogy 

References

  1. Alexy, R. (1990). On the problem of justification of normative statements. In S. Benhabib & F. Dallmayr (Eds.), The communicative ethics controversy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Benhabib, S. (1986). Critique: A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York, NY: Norm and Utopia.Google Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. (1994). Education as practical intersubjectivity: Towards a critical-pragmatic understanding of education. Educational Theory, 44. Google Scholar
  4. Broady, D. (1982). Den dolda läröplanen [The Hidden Curriculum]. Stockholm: Symposium.Google Scholar
  5. Eriksson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Finlayson, G. (2005). Habermas: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics—redistribution, recognition, and participation. In N. Fraser (Ed.), A honneth redistribution or recognition?—a politi cal-philosophical exchange (pp. 7–109). New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Freundlieb, D. (2000) Rethinking critical theory: Weaknesses and new directions. Constellations, 7(1), 80–99.Google Scholar
  9. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Giroux, H., & Purpel, D. (1983). The hidden curriculum and moral education: Deception or discovery. Berkeley: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1984a). Vorstudien und Ergängzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Shurkamp.Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (1990a). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (1990b). Moral consciousness and communicative action. In Moral conscious ness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). System der Sittlichkeit. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  16. Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). System of ethical life and first philosophy of spirit. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Honneth, A. (1981). Moralbewusstsein und soziale Klassenherrschaft (vol. 9, no. 3–4.). Leviathan. (In English: Moral consciousness and class domination. In Disrespect: The Norma tive Foundation of Critical Theory. Cambridege, MA: Polity).Google Scholar
  18. Honneth, A. (1995a). The fragmented world of the social: Essays in social and political philos ophy. New York, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  19. Honneth, A. (1995b). The other of justice—Habermas and the ethical challenge of postmo dernism. In S. K. White (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to habermas (pp. 289–324). Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Honneth, A. (1996). Struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Honneth, A. (2001). Kamppailua tunnustuksesta [Struggle for Recognition] (p. 24). Newspaper inter view by Olli-Pekka Moisio. Keskisuomalainen, 15 December 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Honneth, A. (2007). Love and morality: On the moral content of emotional ties. In Disres pect: the normative foundation of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  23. Huttunen, R. (2003). Habermas and the Problem of Indoctrination. In Peters, M., Ghiraldelli, P., Zarni′c, B., Gibbons, A., Heraud, R, (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of philosophy of education. Internet: http://www.ffst.hr/ENCYCLOPAEDIA.
  24. Huttunen, R. (2009). Habermas, Honneth and education. Köln: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Huttunen, R., & Heikkinen, L. T. H. (1998). Between facts and norms: action research in the light of jürgen habermas’s theory of communicative action and discourse theory of justice. Curriculum studies, 6(3), 307–322.Google Scholar
  26. Huttunen, R., & Suoranta, J. (2006). Radical adult education between redistribution and rec ognition. In A. Antikainen, P. Harinen, & C. Torres (Eds.), In from the margins: Adult education, work and civil society. Amsterdam: Sense Publisher.Google Scholar
  27. Morrow, R., & Torres, A. (2002). Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical pedagogy and transfor mative social change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Regh, W. (l996). Translators introduction. In Habermas, J, (Ed.) Between facts and norms (pp ix–xxxviii). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Siep, L. (1979). Anerkennung als prinzip praktischen philosophie. München: Karl Albert Frei burg.Google Scholar
  30. Stojanov, K. (2007) Intersubjective recognition and the development of propositional thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(1), 75–93.Google Scholar
  31. Toulmin, S. (1958). An Examination of the place of reason in ethics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
  2. 2.King’s Learning Institute, King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations