Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 141–153

The Ignorant Citizen: Mouffe, Rancière, and the Subject of Democratic Education

Article

Abstract

Much work in the field of education for democratic citizenship is based on the idea that it is possible to know what a good citizen is, so that the task of citizenship education becomes that of the production of the good citizen. In this paper I ask whether and to what extent we can and should understand democratic citizenship as a positive identity. I approach this question by means of an exploration of four dimensions of democratic politics—the political community, the borders of the political order, the dynamics of democratic processes and practices, and the status of the democratic subject—in order to explore whether and to what extent the ‘essence’ of democratic politics can and should be understood as a particular order. For this I engage with ideas from Chantal Mouffe and Jacques Rancière who both have raised fundamental questions about the extent to which the ‘essence’ of democratic politics can be captured as a particular order. In the paper I introduce the figure of the ignorant citizen in order to hint at a conception of citizenship that is not based on particular knowledge about what the good citizen is. I introduce a distinction between a socialisation conception of citizenship education and civic learning and a subjectification conception of citizenship education and civic learning in order to articulate what the educational implications of such an ‘anarchic’ understanding of democratic politics are. While the socialisation conception focuses on the question how ‘newcomers’ can be inserted into an existing political order, the subjectification conception focuses on the question how democratic subjectivity is engendered through engagement in always undetermined political processes. This is no longer a process driven by knowledge about what the citizen is or should become but one that depends on a desire for a particular mode of human togetherness or, in short, a desire for democracy.

Keywords

Citizenship Democratic education Citizenship education Socialisation Subjectification Chantal Mouffe Jacques Rancière The ignorant citizen Democracy 

References

  1. Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, Co.: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. J. J. (2009a). What kind of citizenship for European Higher Education? Beyond the competent active citizen. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 146–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesta, G. J. J. (2009b). Sporadic democracy: Education, democracy and the question of inclusion. In M. Katz, S. Verducci, & G. Biesta (Eds.), Education, democracy and the moral life (pp. 101–112). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). How to exist politically and learn from it: Hannah Arendt and the problem of democratic education. Teachers College Record, 112(2), 558–577.Google Scholar
  5. Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society. Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Bingham, G., & Biesta, G. J. J., with Jacques Rancière. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, truth, emancipation. London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Dryzek, J. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Elster, J. (Ed.). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Honig, B. (1993). Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  11. Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism. Political science series 72. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Rancière, J. (1995a). On the shores of politics. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Rancière, J. (1995b). Politics, identification, and subjectivization. In J. Rajchman (Ed.), The identity in question (pp. 63–70). New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Rancière, J. (1999). Dis-agreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rancière, J. (2003). The philosopher and his poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ruitenberg, C. (2009). Educating political adversaries. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(3), 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruitenberg, C. (2010a). Queer politics in schools: A Rancièrean reading. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5), 618–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruitenberg, C. (2010b). Conflict, affect and the political: On disagreement as democratic capacity. In Factis Pax, 4(1), 40–55.Google Scholar
  22. Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations