Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 183–195 | Cite as

Transnational Discourses of Knowledge and Learning in Professional Work: Examples from Computer Engineering

  • Monika NerlandEmail author
Article

Abstract

Taking a Foucauldian framework as its point of departure, this paper discusses how transnational discourses of knowledge and learning operate in the profession of computer engineering and form a certain logic through which modes of being an engineer are regulated. Both the knowledge domain of computer engineering and its related labour market is heavily internationalised and characterised by a general focus on universalism and standardisation. Moreover, rapid shifts in technologies and institutional arrangements contribute to an embracement of more wide-ranging discourses related to lifelong learning and the enterprising self. Thus, dominant discourses of knowledge and learning within this profession reflect processes of globalisation and take a transnational character. The paper discusses how the discourses in play constitute mechanisms of governmentality that present certain expectations to professionals and shape their energies, efforts and desires in certain directions. In order to be influential, however, the discourses depend on individuals who take up the subject positions offered and enact them in locally relevant and partially creative ways. Thus, careful analyses of the discourses in specific knowledge communities, as well as of their interrelated subject positions, may enhance our understanding of the more epistemic dimensions of globalisation and how these come to influence the imaginations of individuals as ‘citizens of the world.’

Keywords

Professional work Learning Discourses of knowledge Governmentality Cosmopolitanism 

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Invisible mediators of action: Classification and the ubiquity of standards. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7(1–2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brint, S. (2001). Professionals and the ‘knowledge economy’: Rethinking the theory of postindustrial society. Current Sociology, 49(4), 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Collier, S. J., & Ong, A. (2005). Global assemblages, anthropological problems. In S. J. Collier & A. Ong (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 3–21). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. Communication from the commission, COM(2001) 678. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, K., & Mathieu, C. (2005). Gender inequality in the IT sector in Sweden and Ireland. Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life.Google Scholar
  8. Dean, M. M. (2006). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drummond, J. (2003). Care of the self in a knowledge economy: Higher education, vocation and the ethics of Michel Foucault. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, R. (2004). Mobilising concepts: Intellectual technologies in the ordering of learning societies. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Featherstone, M., & Venn, C. (2006). Problematizing global knowledge and the new encyclopaedia project. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fendler, L. (1998). What is it impossible to think? A genealogy of the educated subject. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 39–63). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1994a). The ethics of the concern for the self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 1. Ethics. Subjectivity and truth (pp. 281–302). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1994b). Technologies of the self. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 1. Ethics. subjectivity and truth (pp. 223–251). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (2001). Governmentality. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3. Power (pp. 201–222). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism. The third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Grey, C. (1994). Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 28(2), 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins, J. W., & Hallström, K. T. (2007). Standardization, globalization and rationalities of government. Organization, 14(5), 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Infinito, J. (2003). Ethical self-formation: A look at the later Foucault. Educational Theory, 53(2), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karseth, B., & Nerland, M. (2007). Building professionalism in a knowledge society: Examining discourses of knowledge in four professional associations. Journal of Education and Work, 20(4), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knorr Cetina, K. (2002). Transitions in post-social knowledge societies. In E. Ben-Rafael & Y. Sternberg (Eds.), Identity, culture, and globalization (pp. 611–628). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Knorr Cetina, K. (2006). Knowledge in a knowledge society: Five transitions. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3), 23–41.Google Scholar
  26. Knorr Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lahn, L. C., & Jensen, K. (2007). Models of professional learning. Exploring the epistemic tool perspective. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3), 63–82.Google Scholar
  28. Loogma, K., Ümarik, M., & Vilu, R. (2004). Identification—flexibility dilemma of IT specialists. Career Development International, 9(3), 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mackenzie, A. (2005). The performativity of code: Software and cultures of circulation. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, T. (1993). The well-tempered self: Citizenship, culture, and the postmodern subject. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Nerland, M. (2008). Knowledge cultures and the shaping of work-based learning: The case of computer engineering. Vocations and Learning: Studies in Vocational and Professional Education, 1(1), 49–69.Google Scholar
  32. O’Riain, S. (2000). Net-working for a living: Irish software developers in the global workplace. In M. Burawoy, J. A. Blum, S. George, Z. Gille, T. Gowan, L. Haney, M. Klawiter, S. H. Lopez, S. O’Riain, & M. Thayer (Eds.), Global ethnography: Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world (pp. 175–202). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ong, A. (2005). Ecologies of expertise: Assembling flows, managing citizenship. In S. J. Collier & A. Ong (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 337–353). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Peters, M. (2001). Education, enterprise culture and the entrepreneurial self: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 58–71.Google Scholar
  36. Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory, 58(4), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strathern, M. (2006). Knowledge on its travels: Dispersal and divergence in the makeup of communities. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 31(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson, J. B., & Edwards, H. M. (2001). Achieving a world-wide software engineering profession: A report on the CSEET 2001 workshop. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tobias, S. (2005). Foucault on freedom and capabilities. Theory, Culture and Society, 22(4), 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tuschling, A., & Engemann, C. (2006). From education to lifelong learning: The emerging regime of learning in the European Union. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Usher, R., & Solomon, N. (1999). Experiential learning and the shaping of subjectivity in the workplace. Studies in the Education of Adults, 31(2), 155–163.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Educational ResearchUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations