Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 3–14 | Cite as

The Unnatural Nature of Nature and Nurture: Questioning the Romantic Heritage

Article

Abstract

From a cultural-historical perspective, nature and nurture (and thus education) are contested concepts. The paper focuses on the nature/nurture debate in the work of William Shakespeare (influenced by Montaigne) and in the Romantic tradition (evidenced by Rousseau and Wordsworth), and argues that while our Romantic inheritance (still highly influential in education) problematises nurture, it tends to mystify nature. Given that conceptions of nature are culturally driven, there is an urgent educational challenge to problematise nature as well as nurture.

Keywords

History Romanticism Nature Environment Culture Philosophy Education 

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  2. Bonnett, M. (2003). Retrieving nature: Education for a post-humanist age. Special edition of Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(4).Google Scholar
  3. Bowers, C. A. (2001). Educating for eco-justice and community. Athens, London: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  4. DeMause, L. (Ed.). (1976). The history of childhood. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology, Psychological Review, 3, 357–370. Retrieved from http://spartan.ac.brocku.ca/~lward/Dewey/Dewey_1896.html. Accessed 11/14/2006.
  6. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and nature. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. Frame, D. M. (1948). The complete essays of Montaigne. Lao Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Hourd, M. (1949). The education of the poetic spirit. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  11. Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Norton, D. F. (Ed.). (1993). The Cambridge companion to Hume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rousseau, J.-J. (1979). In A. Bloom (Ed.), Émile, or on education (chap. 1). New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  14. Stables, A. (2003). School as imagined community in discursive space: a perspective on the school effectiveness debate. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 895–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stables, A. (2005). Living and learning as semiotic engagement: A new theory of education. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  16. Stables, A., & Scott, W. (1999). Environmental education and the discourses of humanist modernity: Redefining critical environmental literacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 31(2), 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stables, A., & Scott, W. (2001). Post-humanist liberal pragmatism? Environmental education out of modernity. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(2), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tillyard, E. M. W. (1943). The Elizabethan world picture. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Whitehead, A. N. (1950). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Wordsworth, W. (1973). In T. Hutchinson (Ed.), Wordsworth: Poetical works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of BathhBathUK

Personalised recommendations