Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 135–151 | Cite as

Authenticity and Constructivism in Education

  • Laurance J. SplitterEmail author


This paper examines the concept of authenticity and its relevance in education, from a philosophical perspective. Under the heading of educational authenticity (EA), I critique Fred Newmann’s views on authentic pedagogy and intellectual work. I argue against the notion that authentic engagement is usefully analyzed in terms of a relationship between school work and: “real” work. I also seek to clarify the increasingly problematic concept of constructivism, arguing that there are two distinct constructivist theses, only one of which deserves serious attention. I explain that the correspondence view of authenticity pays insufficient attention to the reality that the presence of “real world” connections does not guarantee that teaching and learning will be truly authentic. As a bridge to a philosophically acceptable understanding of authenticity, I reflect on John Dewey, who famously strove to base his views on education on the experience of the child, while rejecting that such experience requires validation from the “real” world. And Jean Jacques Rousseau offers several clues as to how the search for an authentic self might proceed beyond the Romanticist vision of an inner essence. These include the idea of the self as constructed inter-subjectively, which I capture by the term “one among others” and which, in turn, reveals persons as dialogically engaged in working out who they are and what they stand for (an idea found in the work of Charles Taylor). There is a clear affinity here with the imperative proposed by Newmann. I embrace the idea that the cultivation of dialogue should be a key priority in classrooms, because dialogue drives each individual to seek meaning in the context of seeing her/himself as one among others. I highlight the role of the classroom community of inquiry as an environment which has the dual function of cultivating disciplined inquiry and facilitating the kind of personal development that can, most properly, be termed “authentic”.


Authenticity Educational authenticity Dewey Newmann Rousseau Taylor Constructivism Meaning Self among others Community of inquiry 


  1. Alexander, R. (2004). Toward dialogic teaching (2nd ed.). UK: Dialogos.Google Scholar
  2. Appiah, K. A. (2005). The ethics of identity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. (1938a). Experience and education. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1938b). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  6. Ferrara, A. (1998). Reflective authenticity: Rethinking the project of modernity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Guignon, C. (2004). On being authentic. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. McTighe, J., Seif, E., & Wiggins, G. (2004). You can teach for meaning. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 27–30.Google Scholar
  10. Nehamas, A. (1999). Virtues of authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Newmann, F., Bryk, A., & Nagaoka, J. (2001). Authentic intellectual work and standardized tests: Conflict or coexistence? In F. Newmann, A. Bryk & J. Nagaoka (Eds.), Improving Chicago’s schools (pp. 2–33). Chicago, Ill: Consortium on Chicago School Research.Google Scholar
  12. Newmann, F., et al. (1996a). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Newmann, F., Marks, H., & Gamoran, A. (1996b). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(August), 280–312.Google Scholar
  14. Newmann, F., Marks, H., & Gamoran, A. (1995). Authentic pedagogy: Standards that boost student performance. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 8(Spring), 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. Paul, R. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.Google Scholar
  16. Petraglia, J. (1998). Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Ass.Google Scholar
  17. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  19. Splitter, L. (2000). Concepts, communities and the tools of good thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 19(2), 11–26.Google Scholar
  20. Splitter, L. (2003). Transforming how teachers teach and how children learn. Critical and Creative Thinking: The Australasian Journal of Philosophy for Children, 11(2), 40–56.Google Scholar
  21. Splitter, L. (2005). Meanings as connections: Implications for teaching and learning. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 25(1), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  22. Splitter, L. (2007). Do the groups to which I belong make me me? Reflections on community and identity. Theory and Research in Education, 5(3), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Splitter, L., & Sharp, A. (1995). Teaching for better thinking: The classroom community of inquiry. Melbourne: The Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  24. Stigler, J. W. et al (1999). The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings from an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan and the United States. Research and Development Report No. NCES-1999-074. Available at
  25. Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic enquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Free Press 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hunter CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations