Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 27, Issue 2–3, pp 79–87 | Cite as

Teaching and Truthfulness

Article

Abstract

Some tendencies in modern education—the stress on ‘performativity’, for instance, and ‘celebration of difference’—threaten the value traditionally placed on truthful teaching. In this paper, truthfulness is mainly understood, following Bernard Williams, as a disposition to ‘Accuracy’ and ‘Sincerity’—hence as a virtue. It is to be distinguished from truth (a property of beliefs), and current debates about the nature of truth are not relevant to the issue of the value of truthfulness. This issue devolves into the question of whether truthfulness is a distinctive virtue of teachers, which they have a special obligation to exercise in the face of competing aims. This paper defends the idea of distinctive professional duties and considers two conceptions of teaching which ascribe a central place to truthfulness. The first conceives of teaching as a personal relationship within which trust, and hence, it is claimed, truthfulness, are paramount. This claim is challenged, and the paper concludes by sympathetically considering a second conception of teaching, articulated by Oakeshott and Heidegger. In this conception, teaching is a ‘releasement’ from ‘the daily flux’ of pupils’ lives through a truthful initiation into the alternatives to this ‘daily flux’ found within ‘the civilized inheritance of mankind’.

Keywords

Teaching Truth Truthfulness Virtue 

References

  1. Apple, M., Gandin, L., & Hypolito, A. (2001). Paolo Freire. In J. Palmer (Ed.), Fifty modern thinkers on education: From piaget to the present (pp. 128–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2000). Education in an age of Nihilism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Carr, D. (1994). Knowledge and truth in religious education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 28(2), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coetzee, J. M. (1997). Giving offence: Essays on censorship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, D. E. (2006). Truthfulness and ‘inclusion’ in archaeology. In C. G. Scarre (Ed.), The ethics of archaeology (pp. 131–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fichte, J. G. (1988). Early philosophical writings (trans: D. Breazeale (Ed.)). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Freire, P., & Giroux, H. (1989). Popular culture, schooling and everyday life. Westport, Conn: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  8. Fullinwider, R. K. (2003). Multicultural education. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 487–500). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? (trans: J. Glenn Gray). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  10. Heidegger, M. (2002). Heidegger on the art of teaching (trans: V. Allen & A. Axiotis). In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education and modernity (pp. 27–45). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. Oakeshott, M. (1989). The voice of liberal learning. In T. Fuller (Ed.), Michael Oakeshott on education. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Parker, S. (1997). Reflective teaching in the postmodern world. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sartre, J.-P. (1957). Being and nothingness (trans: H. Barnes). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  14. Scheffler, S. (2005). Egalitarian liberalism as moral pluralism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LXXVIII, 229–253.Google Scholar
  15. Strike, K. A. (2003). The ethics of teaching. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 509–524). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Strike, K. A., & Soltis, J. F. (1998). The ethics of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Tamir, Y. (2003). Education and the politics of identity. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 501–508). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations