Teaching and Truthfulness
- 259 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
Some tendencies in modern education—the stress on ‘performativity’, for instance, and ‘celebration of difference’—threaten the value traditionally placed on truthful teaching. In this paper, truthfulness is mainly understood, following Bernard Williams, as a disposition to ‘Accuracy’ and ‘Sincerity’—hence as a virtue. It is to be distinguished from truth (a property of beliefs), and current debates about the nature of truth are not relevant to the issue of the value of truthfulness. This issue devolves into the question of whether truthfulness is a distinctive virtue of teachers, which they have a special obligation to exercise in the face of competing aims. This paper defends the idea of distinctive professional duties and considers two conceptions of teaching which ascribe a central place to truthfulness. The first conceives of teaching as a personal relationship within which trust, and hence, it is claimed, truthfulness, are paramount. This claim is challenged, and the paper concludes by sympathetically considering a second conception of teaching, articulated by Oakeshott and Heidegger. In this conception, teaching is a ‘releasement’ from ‘the daily flux’ of pupils’ lives through a truthful initiation into the alternatives to this ‘daily flux’ found within ‘the civilized inheritance of mankind’.
Keywords
Teaching Truth Truthfulness VirtueReferences
- Apple, M., Gandin, L., & Hypolito, A. (2001). Paolo Freire. In J. Palmer (Ed.), Fifty modern thinkers on education: From piaget to the present (pp. 128–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., & Standish, P. (2000). Education in an age of Nihilism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Carr, D. (1994). Knowledge and truth in religious education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 28(2), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coetzee, J. M. (1997). Giving offence: Essays on censorship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, D. E. (2006). Truthfulness and ‘inclusion’ in archaeology. In C. G. Scarre (Ed.), The ethics of archaeology (pp. 131–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Fichte, J. G. (1988). Early philosophical writings (trans: D. Breazeale (Ed.)). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Freire, P., & Giroux, H. (1989). Popular culture, schooling and everyday life. Westport, Conn: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
- Fullinwider, R. K. (2003). Multicultural education. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 487–500). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? (trans: J. Glenn Gray). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. (2002). Heidegger on the art of teaching (trans: V. Allen & A. Axiotis). In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Heidegger, education and modernity (pp. 27–45). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Oakeshott, M. (1989). The voice of liberal learning. In T. Fuller (Ed.), Michael Oakeshott on education. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Parker, S. (1997). Reflective teaching in the postmodern world. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Sartre, J.-P. (1957). Being and nothingness (trans: H. Barnes). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Scheffler, S. (2005). Egalitarian liberalism as moral pluralism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LXXVIII, 229–253.Google Scholar
- Strike, K. A. (2003). The ethics of teaching. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 509–524). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strike, K. A., & Soltis, J. F. (1998). The ethics of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Tamir, Y. (2003). Education and the politics of identity. In R. Curren (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 501–508). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar