Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 25, Issue 1–2, pp 1–18 | Cite as

What Philosophy can and cannot do for Education

Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gibson, J.Huemer, W. eds. 2004The literary WittgensteinRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Moore, G.E. 1955Wittgenstein’s lectures on ethicsMind64127Google Scholar
  3. Taylor, C. 1985aPhilosophical papers. Vol. 1. Human agency and languageCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Taylor, C. 1985bPhilosophical papers: Vol. 2. Philosophy and the human sciencesCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (D. Pears & B.F. McGuinness, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  6. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations/Philosophische Untersuchungen (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Wittgenstein, L. 1965A lecture on ethicsPhilosophical Review74312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel (Edited by G.E.M. Anscombe & G.H. von Wright; G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Wittgenstein, L. 1969The blue and brown books2Basil BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Wittgenstein, L. 1979

    Remarks on Frazer’s golden bough

    Luckhardt, C. eds. Wittgenstein: Sources and perspectivesThe Harvester PressHassocks Sussex6181
    Google Scholar
  11. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value/Vermischte Bemerkungen (Edited by G.H. von Wright; P. Winch, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesKatholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations