Advertisement

Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 24, Issue 3–4, pp 235–253 | Cite as

Three Abductive Solutions to the Meno Paradox – with Instinct, Inference, and Distributed Cognition

  • Sami Paavola
  • Kai Hakkarainen
Article

Abstract

This article analyzes three approaches to resolving the classical Meno paradox, or its variant, the learning paradox, emphasizing Charles S. Peirce’s notion of abduction. Abduction provides a way of dissecting those processes where something new, or conceptually more complex than before, is discovered or learned. In its basic form, abduction is a “weak” form of inference, i.e., it gives only tentative suggestions for further investigation. But it is not too weak if various sources of clues and restrictions on the abductive search are taken into account. We present three, complementary versions of abduction: (1) as a sort of guessing instinct or expert-like intuition, where unconscious clues are important; (2) as a form of inference, where a strategic point of view is essential; and (3) as a part of distributed cognition and mediated activity, where the interaction with the material, social, and cultural environment is emphasized. Our starting point is Peirce’s own notion of abduction, but we broaden the perspective, especially to the direction of distributed cognition.

Key words

Meno paradox learning paradox abduction Peirce guessing distributed cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achinstein, P. (1970). Inference to scientific laws. In R.H. Stuwer (ed). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 5: 87–111Google Scholar
  2. Bereiter, C. 1985Towards a solution of the learning paradoxReview of Educational Research55201226Google Scholar
  3. Bereiter, C. 2002Education and mind in the knowledge ageErlbaumHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M. 1993Surpassing ourselves. An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertiseOpen CourtChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole, M., Engeström, Y. 1993A cultural–historical approach to distributed cognitionSalomon, G. eds. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerationsCambridge University PressCambridge146Google Scholar
  6. CP (volume.paragraph, year) – see: Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958)Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, D.J. 1998Cognition as semiosis: The role of inferenceTheory and Psychology8827840Google Scholar
  8. Cziko, G. 1995Without miracles. Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian RevolutionA Bradford Book, The MIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Donald, M. 1981The origins of the modern mindHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Dreyfus, H., Dreyfus, S. 1986Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computerBasil BlackwellOxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Eco, U., Sebeok, T.A. 1988The sign of three. Dupin, Holmes, PeirceIndiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Engeström, Y. 1987Learning by expandingOrienta-KonsultitHelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  13. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., Punamäki, R.-L. 1999Perspectives on activity theoryCambridge University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Feltovich, P.J., Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L. 1997Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and changeFeltovich, P.J.Ford, K.M.Hoffman, R.R. eds. Expertise in contextAAAI PressMenlo Park, CA125146Google Scholar
  15. Fleck, L. 1935Genesis and development of a scientific factThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Gruber Howard, E. 1981On the relation between ‘aha experiences’ and the construction of ideasHistory of Science194159Google Scholar
  17. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., Lehtinen, E. 2004Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectivesElsevierAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Hakkarainen, K., Sintonen, M. 2002Interrogative approach on inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learningScience and Education112543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanson, N.R. 1958Patterns of discoveryUniversity PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Hanson N.R. (1961). Is there a logic of scientific discovery. In: Feigl H., Maxwell G. (eds.). Current issues in the philosophy of science. Holt Rinehart and Winston Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Harman, G. 1965Inference to the best explanationPhilosophical Review748895Google Scholar
  22. Harman, G. 1986Change in viewMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Hogarth, R.M. 2001Educating intuitionThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Hutchins, E. 1995Cognition in the wildMITCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuhn, T.S. 1970The structure of scientific revolutions2nd enlarged ed.,University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Lipton, P. 2004Inference to the best explanation2nd ed.RoutledgeLondon(first published 1991)Google Scholar
  27. Macmillan, C.J.B., Garrison, J.W. 1988A logical theory of teaching. Erotetics and intentionalityKluwer Academic PublishersDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  28. Magnani, L. 2001Abduction, reason, and science. Processes of discovery and explanationKluwer Academic/Plenum PublishersNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. McGrenere, J. and Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, 179–186. Available: http://www.cs.ubc.ca/ joanna/# Publications
  30. Mullins, P. 2002Peirce’s abduction and Polanyi’s tacit knowingThe Journal of Speculative Philosophy16198224Google Scholar
  31. Nesher, D. 2001Peircean epistemology of learning and the function of abduction as the logic of discoveryTransactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society372357Google Scholar
  32. Nickles, T. 1981What is a problem that we may solve it?Synthese4785118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niiniluoto, I. 1999Defending abductionPhilosophy of Science66S436S451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paavola, S. 2004aAbduction through grammar, critic and methodeuticTransactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society40245270Google Scholar
  35. Paavola, S. 2004bAbduction as a logic of discovery: The importance of strategiesFoundations of Science9267283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paavola, S. 2005Peircean abduction: Instinct, or inference?Semiotica153-1/4131154Google Scholar
  37. Pea, R.D. 1993Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for educationSalomon, G. eds. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerationsCambridge University PressCambridge4787Google Scholar
  38. Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958) [CP (volume.paragraph, year)]. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol 1–6, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds), vol 7–8, A. W. Burks (ed). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Peirce C.S. (1985). Historical perspectives on Peirces logic of science. A history of science, 2 Vols. In C. Eisele (ed). Mouton Publishers, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. Peirce, C.S. 1929GuessingHound & Horn2267282Google Scholar
  41. Piattelli-Palmarini, M. eds. 1980Language and learning. The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam ChomskyHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, reprinted 1983Google Scholar
  43. Popper, K. 1972Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approachOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Prawat, R.S. 1999Dewey, Peirce, and the learning paradoxAmerican Educational Research Journal364776Google Scholar
  45. Ransdell J. (2003). The relevance of Peircean semiotic to computational intelligence augmentation. S.E.E.D. Journal (Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development), 3(3), 5–36. Available: http://www.library.utoronto.ca/see/SEED/Vol3–3/Ransdell.htmGoogle Scholar
  46. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. and the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel Distributed Processing. Exploration in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Salomon, G. 1993Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerationsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Semetsky, I. 2005Peirce’s semiotics, subdoxastic aboutness, and the paradox of inquiryEducational Philosophy and Theory37227238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Semmelweis, I. 1983The etiology, concept, and prophylaxis of Childbed Fever. Translated by K. Codell CarterThe University of Wisconsin PressWisconsinGoogle Scholar
  50. Shanahan, Timothy 1986The first moment of scientific inquiry: C. S. Peirce on the logic of abductionTransactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society22450466Google Scholar
  51. Skagestad, P. 1993Thinking with machines: Intelligence augmentation, evolutionary epistemology, and semioticThe Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems16157180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thagard, P. 1988Computational philosophy of scienceMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  53. Thagard, Paul 2000Coherence in thought and actionA Bradford Book, MIT PressCambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  54. Thagard, P., Shelley, C. 1997Abductive reasoning: Logic, visual thinking, and coherenceDalla Chiara, M.L.Doets, K.Mundici, D.Bentham, J. eds. Logic and scientific methodsKluwerDordrecht413427Google Scholar
  55. Vygotsky, L.S. 1978Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processesHarvard University PressCambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  56. Wartofsky, M. 1979Models, representation, and the scientific understandingReidelBostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations