Studies in Philosophy and Education

, Volume 24, Issue 3–4, pp 213–233 | Cite as

C. S. Peirce’s Dialogical Conception of Sign Processes



This article examines the contention that the central concepts of C. S. Peirce’s semeiotic are inherently communicational. It is argued that the Peircean approach avoids the pitfalls of objectivism and constructivism, rendering the sign-user neither a passive recipient nor an omnipotent creator of meaning. Consequently, semeiotic may serve as a useful general framework for studies of learning processes.


communication dialogue learning Peirce semiosis sign 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bergman, M. 2000Reflections on the role of the communicative sign in semeioticTransactions of the Charles S. Peirce SocietyXXXVI225254Google Scholar
  2. Brock, J. 1975Peirce’s conception of semioticSemiotica14124141Google Scholar
  3. Chisholm, R.M. 1952Intentionality and the theory of signsPhilosophical Studies35663Google Scholar
  4. Colapietro, V.M. 1989Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivityState University of New York PressAlbanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham, D.J. 1992

    On the need for an educational semiotic

    Tarasti, E. eds. Center and periphery in representations and institutionsThe international semiotics instituteImatra423450
    Google Scholar
  6. Fetzer, J.H. 2001Computers and cognition: Why minds are not machinesKluwer Academic PublishersDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisch, M.H. 1986Peirce, semeiotic, and pragmatismIndiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenlee, D. 1973Peirce’s concept of signMouton & CoThe HagueGoogle Scholar
  9. Houser, N. 1987Toward a Peircean semiotic theory of learningThe American Journal of Semiotics5251274Google Scholar
  10. Keeler, M.A. 1990Investigating transparency in the conditions of mediation from a semeiotic viewSemiotica821541Google Scholar
  11. Morris, C.W. 1946Signs, language, and behaviorPrentice-HallNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Parmentier, R.J. 1985

    Signs’ place in medias res: Peirce’s concept of semiotic mediation

    Mertz, E.Parmentier, R.J. eds. Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectivesAcademic PressOrlando2348
    Google Scholar
  13. Peirce C.S. (1931-1958). Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce (CP). 8 Vols., C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Vols. 1-6) (eds), & A. Burks (Vols. 7-8) (ed). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Peirce C.S. (1976). The new elements of mathematics (NEM). 4 Vols. C. Eisele (ed). The Hague: Mouton PublishersGoogle Scholar
  15. Peirce C.S. (1977). Semiotic and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (SS). C.S. Hardwick (ed). Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Peirce C.S. (1982-). Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition (W). 6 Vols. to date. The Peirce Edition Project (ed). Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Peirce C.S. (1992-1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (EP). 2 Vols. N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Vol. 1) (eds), & The Peirce Edition Project (Vol. 2) (ed). Bloomington: Indiana University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W. 1949The mathematical theory of communicationThe University of Illinois PressUrbanaGoogle Scholar
  19. Tiercelin, C. 1995

    The relevance of Peirce’s semiotic for contemporary issues in cognitive science

    Haaparanta, L.Heinamaa, S. eds. Mind and cognition: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive science and artificial intelligenceActa Philosophica Fennica58,Helsinki3774
    Google Scholar
  20. Wells, R.S. 1977

    Criteria for semiosis

    Sebeok, T.A. eds. A perfusion of signsIndiana University PressBloomington121
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations