Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays at 1 AU During the Cycle 23/24 Solar Minimum
- 299 Downloads
Anomalous cosmic ray (ACR) intensities at 1 AU at solar minimum generally track galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensities such as those measured by neutron monitors, albeit with differences between solar polarity cycles. The unusual cycle 23/24 solar minimum was long-lasting with very low sunspot numbers and significantly reduced interplanetary magnetic field strength and solar wind dynamic pressure and turbulence, but also featured a heliospheric current sheet tilt that remained high for an extended period. Peak ACR intensities did not recover to the maximum values reached during the last two A>0 solar minima and just barely reached the last A<0 levels. However, GCR intensities in 2009 (neutron monitor rates and also at ∼200 MeV/nucleon) were the highest recorded during the last 50 years, indicating their intensities were not as heavily modulated during their transport from the outer heliosphere. This unexpected difference in the behavior of ACRs and GCRs remains unexplained, but suggests that either the ACR source intensity may have weakened since the last A<0 epoch, or perhaps that ACR intensities at 1 AU in the ecliptic may be more sensitive than GCRs to the higher tilt angle. This seems plausible if the ACR source intensity is greater at low latitudes during A<0 cycles, while the GCR distribution at the heliospheric boundary is more uniform in latitude. Shortly after an abrupt increase in the current sheet tilt angle in late 2009, both ACR and GCR intensities showed dramatic decreases, marking the end of solar minimum modulation conditions for this cycle.
KeywordsCosmic ray modulation Heliospheric current sheet tilt angle
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- H.S. Ahluwalia, R.C. Ygbuhay, in Twelfth International Solar Wind Conference, ed. by M. Maksimovic et al. AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1216 (AIP, Melville, 2010), pp. 699–702 Google Scholar
- A.C. Cummings, E.C. Stone, F.B. McDonald, B. Heikkila, N. Lal, W.R. Webber, AGU Fall Meeting abstract SH53D-04 (2010) Google Scholar
- R.A. Leske, A.C. Cummings, C.M.S. Cohen, R.A. Mewaldt, E.C. Stone, M.E. Wiedenbeck, T.T. von Rosenvinge, in Proc. 29th Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., Pune, vol. 2 (2005), pp. 113–116 Google Scholar
- R.A. Leske, A.C. Cummings, C.M.S. Cohen, R.A. Mewaldt, E.C. Stone, M.E. Wiedenbeck, T.T. von Rosenvinge, in Proc. 30th Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., Mérida, vol. 1 (2008), pp. 807–810 Google Scholar
- R.A. Leske, A.C. Cummings, C.M.S. Cohen, R.A. Mewaldt, E.C. Stone, M.E. Wiedenbeck, T.T. von Rosenvinge, in Proc. 31st Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., Łódź (2009), paper 0536 Google Scholar
- R.A. Mewaldt, E.C. Stone, R.E. Vogt, in Proc. 14th Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., München, vol. 2 (1975), pp. 804–809 Google Scholar
- M.A. Shea, D.F. Smart, in Proc. 27th Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., Hamburg, vol. 10 (2001), pp. 4063–4066 Google Scholar
- E.C. Stone, A.C. Cummings, in Proc. 26th Internat. Cosmic Ray Conf., Salt Lake City, vol. 7 (1999), pp. 500–503 Google Scholar