Space Science Reviews

, Volume 148, Issue 1–4, pp 267–288 | Cite as

Testing the Stability of the Fine Structure Constant in the Laboratory

  • N. Kolachevsky
  • A. Matveev
  • J. Alnis
  • C. G. Parthey
  • T. Steinmetz
  • T. Wilken
  • R. Holzwarth
  • T. Udem
  • T. W. Hänsch
Open Access
Article

Abstract

In this review we discuss the progress of the past decade in testing for a possible temporal variation of the fine structure constant α. Advances in atomic sample preparation, laser spectroscopy and optical frequency measurements led to rapid reduction of measurement uncertainties. Eventually laboratory tests became the most sensitive tool to detect a possible variation of α at the present epoch. We explain the methods and technologies that helped to make this possible.

Keywords

Drift of the fine structure constant Frequency comb Laser stabilization 

PACS

06.20.Jr 06.30.Ft 32.30.Jc 

References

  1. F. Adler et al., Opt. Express 12, 5872 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. G.P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic Press, New York, 2001) Google Scholar
  3. J. Alnis, A. Matveev, N. Kolachevsky, Th. Udem, T.W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. A 77, 1 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Amy-Klein et al., Opt. Lett. 30, 3320 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. J.N. Bahcall, E.E. Salpeter, Astrophys. J. 142, 1677 (1965) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. F. Biraben et al., in The Hydrogen Atom. Precision Physics of Simple Atomic Systems, ed. by S.G. Karshenboim, F.S. Pavone, G.F. Bassani, M. Inguscio, T.W. Hänsch (Springer, Berlin, 2001), p. 18 Google Scholar
  7. S. Bize et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 150802 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Bize et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, S449-68 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Blatt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 140801 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. X. Calmet, H. Fritzsch, Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 639 (2002b) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. X. Calmet, H. Fritzsch, Phys. Lett. B 540, 173 (2002a) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. H.B.G. Casimir, On the Interaction Between Atomic Nuclei and Electrons (Freeman, San Francisco, 1963), p. 54 MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Chand, R. Srianand, P. Petitjean, B. Aracil, Astron. Astrophys. 417, 853 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Cingöz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 040801 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. T. Damour, F. Piazza, G. Veneziano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 081601 (2002) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. S.A. Diddams, L. Hollberg, L.S. Ma, L. Robertsson, Opt. Lett. 27, 58 (2002) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. S.A. Diddams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5102 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. P.A.M. Dirac, Nature (London) 139, 323 (1937) MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. R.W.P. Drever et al., Appl. Phys. 31, 97 (1983) Google Scholar
  20. V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, Phys. Rev. A 61, 034502 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, J.K. Webb, Phys. Rev. A 59, 230 (1999a) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, J.K. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 888 (1999b) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. J.N. Eckstein, A.I. Ferguson, T.W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 847 (1978) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. M.I. Eides, H. Grotch, V.A. Shelyuto, Phys. Rep. 342, 63 (2001) MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. K.M. Evenson, J.S. Wells, F.R. Petersen, B.L. Danielson, G.W. Day, Appl. Phys. Lett. 22, 192 (1973) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. S.J. Ferrell et al., Phys. Rev. A 76, 062104 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. M. Fischer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 230802 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. V.V. Flambaum, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22, 4937 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. V.V. Flambaum, E.V. Shuryak, AIP Conf. Proc. 995, 1 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. T.M. Fortier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070801 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. R.W. Fox, Proc. SPIE 7099, 70991R (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. H.A. Haus, E.P. İppen, Opt. Lett. 26, 1654 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. C. Henry, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 18, 259 (1982) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. L.O. Hocker, A. Javan, D.R. Rao, L. Frenkel, T. Sullivan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 10, 147 (1967) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. R. Holzwarth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2264 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. R. Holzwarth et al., Laser Phys. 11, 1100 (2001) Google Scholar
  37. A. Huber, Th. Udem, B. Gross, J. Reichert, M. Kourogi, K. Pachucki, M. Weitz, T.W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 468 (1998) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. S.G. Karshenboim, V.G. Ivanov, Euro. Phys. J. D 19, 13 (2002b) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. S.G. Karshenboim, V.G. Ivanov, Phys. Lett. B 524, 259 (2002a) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. H. Katori, M. Takamoto, V.G. Pal’chikov, V.D. Ovsiannikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 173005 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. J.C. Knight et al., Opt. Lett. 21, 1547 (1996) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  42. N. Kolachevsky, M. Fischer, S.G. Karshenboim, T.W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033003 (2004a) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  43. N. Kolachevsky, P. Fendel, S.G. Karshenboim, T.W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. A 70, 063503 (2004b) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  44. P. Kubina et al., Opt. Express 13, 909 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. C. Lämmerzahl, H. Dittus, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 11, 95 (2002) MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. C.-H. Li et al., Nature 452, 610 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  47. L. Lorini et al., Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 163, 19 (2008) CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  48. C. Lovis et al., Nature 441, 305 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  49. A.D. Ludlow et al., Opt. Lett. 32, 641 (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  50. L.S. Ma et al., Science 303(5665), 1843 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  51. G.W. Marcy, R.P. Butler, Astrophys. J. 464, L147 (1996) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  52. H. Marion et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 150801 (2003) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  53. M. Mayor, D. Queloz, Nature 378, 355 (1995) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  54. R. Minkowski, O.C. Wilson, Astrophys. J. 123, 373 (1956) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  55. M.T. Murphy, J.K. Webb, V.V. Flambaum, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 384, 1053 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  56. E. Narevicius, A. Libson, C.G. Parthey, I. Chavez, J. Narevicius, U. Even, M.G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093003 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  57. T. Nazarova, F. Riehle, U. Sterr, Appl. Phys. B 83, 531 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  58. L.E. Nelson et al., Appl. Phys. B 65, 277 (1997) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  59. M. Niering et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5496 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  60. M. Notcutt, L.-S. Ma, J. Ye, J.L. Hall, Opt. Lett. 30, 1815 (2005) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  61. E. Peik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 170801 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  62. E. Peik et al., in Proceedings of the 11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting, Berlin (2006). arXiv:physics/0611088
  63. K. Petermann, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 15, 566 (1979) CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  64. R. Quast, D. Reimers, S.A. Levshakov, Astron. Astrophys. 415, 27 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. J. Reichert, R. Holzwarth, Th. Udem, T.W. Hänsch, Opt. Commun. 172, 59 (1999) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  66. J. Reichert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3232 (2000) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  67. T. Rosenband et al., Science 319, 1808 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  68. A. Sandage, Astrophys. J. 136, 319 (1962) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  69. G. Santarelli et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4619 (1999) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  70. M.P. Savedoff, Nature 178, 689 (1956) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  71. A.L. Schawlow, C.H. Townes, Phys. Rev. 112, 1940 (1958) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  72. H. Schnatz, B. Lipphardt, J. Helmcke, F. Riehle, G. Zinner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 18 (1996) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  73. E.H. Schröter, D. Soltau, E. Wiehr, Vistas Astron. 28, 519 (1985) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  74. T. Steinmetz et al., Science 321, 1335 (2008) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  75. H. Stoehr, F. Mensing, J. Helmcke, U. Sterr, Opt. Lett. 31, 736 (2006) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  76. T.R. Taylor, G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 213, 450 (1988) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  77. R.I. Thompson, Astron. Lett. 16, 3 (1975) Google Scholar
  78. Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, T.W. Hänsch, Nature 416, 233 (2002) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  79. Th. Udem, J. Reichert, R. Holzwarth, T.W. Hänsch, Opt. Lett. 24, 881 (1999) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  80. N. Vanhaecke, U. Meier, M. Andrist, B.H. Meier, F. Merkt, Phys. Rev. A 75, 031402(R) (2007) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  81. D.A. Varshalovich, A.V. Ivanchik, A.V. Orlov, A.Y. Potekhin, P. Petitjean, Current status of the problem of cosmological variability of fundamental physical constants, in Lecture Notes in Physics: Precision Physics of Simple Atomic Systems, ed. by S.G. Karshenboim, V.B. Smirnov (Springer, Berlin, 2003), pp. 199 Google Scholar
  82. J.K. Webb, V.V. Flambaum, C.W. Churchill, M.J. Drinkwater, J.D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 884 (1999) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  83. J.K. Webb et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 091301 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  84. M. Weitz, A. Huber, F. Schmidt-Kaler, D. Leibfried, T.W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 328 (1994) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  85. B.C. Young, F.C. Cruz, W.M. Itano, J.C. Bergquist, Phys. Rev. A 82, 3799 (1999) ADSGoogle Scholar
  86. M. Zimmermann, C. Gohle, R. Holzwarth, Th. Udem, T.W. Hänsch, Opt. Lett. 29, 310 (2004) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Kolachevsky
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Matveev
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Alnis
    • 1
  • C. G. Parthey
    • 1
  • T. Steinmetz
    • 1
    • 3
  • T. Wilken
    • 1
  • R. Holzwarth
    • 3
  • T. Udem
    • 1
  • T. W. Hänsch
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Max-Planck Institut für QuantenoptikGarchingGermany
  2. 2.P.N. Lebedev Physical InstituteMoscowRussia
  3. 3.MenloSystems GmbHMartinsriedGermany
  4. 4.Ludwig-Maximilians-UniversitätMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations