Space Science Reviews

, Volume 141, Issue 1–4, pp 265–275 | Cite as

The Search Coil Magnetometer for THEMIS

  • A. Roux
  • O. Le Contel
  • C. Coillot
  • A. Bouabdellah
  • B. de la Porte
  • D. Alison
  • S. Ruocco
  • M. C. Vassal
Article

Abstract

THEMIS instruments incorporate a tri-axial Search Coil Magnetometer (SCM) designed to measure the magnetic components of waves associated with substorm breakup and expansion. The three search coil antennas cover the same frequency bandwidth, from 0.1 Hz to 4 kHz, in the ULF/ELF frequency range. They extend, with appropriate Noise Equivalent Magnetic Induction (NEMI) and sufficient overlap, the measurements of the fluxgate magnetometers. The NEMI of the searchcoil antennas and associated pre-amplifiers is smaller than 0.76 pT \(/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}\) at 10 Hz. The analog signals produced by the searchcoils and associated preamplifiers are digitized and processed inside the Digital Field Box (DFB) and the Instrument Data Processing Unit (IDPU), together with data from the Electric Field Instrument (EFI). Searchcoil telemetry includes waveform transmission, FFT processed data, and data from a filter bank. The frequency range covered depends on the available telemetry. The searchcoils and their three axis structures have been precisely calibrated in a calibration facility, and the calibration of the transfer function is checked on board, usually once per orbit. The tri-axial searchcoils implemented on the five THEMIS spacecraft are working nominally.

Keywords

Search-coil magnetometer Magnetospheric mission Substorm physics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. Angelopoulos et al., The THEMIS mission. Space Sci. Rev. (2008, this issue). doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1 MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. J.W. Bonnell, F.S. Mozer, G.T. Delory, A.J. Hull, R.E. Ergun, C.M. Cully, V. Angelopoulos, The electric field instrument (EFI) for THEMIS. Space Sci. Rev. (2008, this issue) Google Scholar
  3. R.M. Bozorth, D.M. Chapin, Demagnetizing factors of rods. J. Appl. Phys. 13, 320–326 (1942) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. S.V. Bulanov, F. Pegoraro, A.S. Sakharov, Magnetic reconnection in electron dynamics. Phys. Fluids B 4, 2499–2508 (1992) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Coillot, J. Moutoussamy, P. Leroy, G. Chanteur, A. Roux, Improvements on the design of search coil magnetometer for space experiments. Sens. Lett. 5, 1–4 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, P. Chauveau, S. Louis, A. Meyer, J. Nappa, S. Perraut, L. Rezeau, P. Robert, A. Roux, C. de Villedary, Y. de Conchy, L. Friel, C.C. Harvey, D. Hubert, C. Lacombe, R. Manning, F. Wouters, F. Lefeuvre, M. Parrot, J.L. Pinçon, B. Poirier, W. Kofman, P. Louarn, The cluster Spatio-temporal Analysis of Field Fluctuations (STAFF) experiment. Space Sci. Rev. 79, 107–136 (1997) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, G. Chanteur, S. Perraut, L. Rezeau, P. Robert, A. Roux, C. de Villedary, P. Canu, M. Maksimovic, Y. de Conchy, D. Hubert, C. Lacombe, F. Lefeuvre, M. Parrot, J.-L. Pinçon, P.M.E. Décréau, C.C. Harvey, P. Louarn, O. Santolik, H.St. Alleyne, M. Roth, T. Chust, O. Le Contel, STAFF team, First results obtained by the Cluster STAFF experiment. Ann. Geophys. 21, 437–456 (2003) ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. C.M. Cully, R.E. Ergun, K. Stevens, A. Nammari, J. Westfall, The THEMIS digital fields board. Space Sci. Rev. (2008, this issue). doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9417-1 Google Scholar
  9. P.R. Harvey et al., The THEMIS observatory. Space Sci. Rev. (2008, this issue) Google Scholar
  10. O. Le Contel, A. Roux, P. Robert, C. Coillot, A. Bouabdellah, B. de la Porte, D. Alison, S. Ruocco, V. Angelopoulos, K. Bromund, C.C. Chaston, C. Cully, First results of THEMIS Search Coil Magnetometers (SCM). Space Sci. Rev. (2008, this issue). doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9371-y Google Scholar
  11. M. Ludlam et al., The THEMIS magnetic cleanliness program. Space Sci. Rev. (2008, this issue). doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9423-3 Google Scholar
  12. A.T.Y. Lui, Current controversies in magnetospheric physics. Rev. Geophys. 39(4), 535–563 (2001) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. A.T.Y. Lui, R.E. Lopez, B.J. Anderson, K. Takahashi, L.J. Zanetti, R.W. McEntire, T.A. Potemra, D.M. Klumpar, E.M. Greene, R. Strangeway, Current disruption in the near-Earth neutral sheet region. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 1461 (1992) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. M.E. Mandt, R.E. Denton, J.F. Drake, Transition to whistler mediated magnetic reconnection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21(1), 73–77 (1994) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. J.A. Osborn, Demagnetizing factors of the general ellipsoid. Phys. Rev. 67(11–12), 351–357 (1945) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Ripka, Magnetic sensors and magnetometers. Artech house (2001) Google Scholar
  17. A. Roux, S. Perraut, P. Robert, A. Morane, A. Pedersen, A. Korth, G. Kremser, B. Aparicio, D. Rodgers, R. Pellinen, Plasma sheet instability related to the westward traveling surge. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 17,697 (1991) CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Taylor et al., The THEMIS instrument data processing unit. Space Sci. Rev. (2008, this issue) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Roux
    • 1
  • O. Le Contel
    • 1
  • C. Coillot
    • 1
  • A. Bouabdellah
    • 1
  • B. de la Porte
    • 1
  • D. Alison
    • 1
  • S. Ruocco
    • 1
  • M. C. Vassal
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre d’étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires (CETP)VélizyFrance
  2. 2.3D PlusBucFrance

Personalised recommendations