Space Science Reviews

, Volume 125, Issue 1–4, pp 331–344 | Cite as

Solar Influences on Dynamical Coupling Between the Stratosphere and Troposphere

  • J. D. HaighEmail author
  • M. Blackburn


We use a simplified atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) to investigate the response of the lower atmosphere to thermal perturbations in the lower stratosphere. The results show that generic heating of the lower stratosphere tends to weaken the sub-tropical jets and the tropospheric mean meridional circulations. The positions of the jets, and the extent of the Hadley cells, respond to the distribution of the stratospheric heating, with low latitude heating displacing them poleward, and uniform heating displacing them equatorward. The patterns of response to the low latitude heating are similar to those found to be associated with solar variability in previous observational data analysis, and to the effects of varying solar UV radiation in sophisticated AGCMs. In order to investigate the chain of causality involved in converting the stratospheric thermal forcing to a tropospheric climate signal we conduct an experiment which uses an ensemble of model spin-ups to analyse the time development of the response to an applied stratospheric perturbation. We find that the initial effect of the change in static stability at the tropopause is to reduce the eddy momentum flux convergence in this region. This is followed by a vertical transfer of the momentum forcing anomaly by an anomalous mean circulation to the surface, where it is partly balanced by surface stress anomalies. The unbalanced part drives the evolution of the vertically integrated zonal flow. We conclude that solar heating of the stratosphere may produce changes in the circulation of the troposphere even without any direct forcing below the tropopause. We suggest that the impact of the stratospheric changes on wave propagation is key to the mechanisms involved.


solar variability climate variability stratosphere-troposphere coupling storm tracks 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Crooks, S., and Gray, L. J.: 2005, ‘Characterisation of the 11-year solar cycle using a multiple regression analysis of the ERA-40 dataset’, J. Clim. 18, 996–1015.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Gleisner, H., and Thejll, P.: 2003, ‘Patterns of tropospheric response to solar variability’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, doi:10.1029/2003GL017129.Google Scholar
  3. Haigh, J. D.: 1996, ‘The impact of solar variability on climate’, Science 272, 981–984.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Haigh, J. D.: 1999, ‘A GCM study of climate change in response to the 11-year solar cycle’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 871–892.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Haigh, J. D.: 2001, ‘Climate variability and the role of the Sun’, Science 294, 2109–2111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haigh, J. D.: 2003, ‘The effects of solar variability on the Earth's climate’, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A. 361, 95–111.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Haigh, J. D., Blackburn, M., and Day, R.: 2005, ‘The response of tropospheric circulation to perturbations in lower stratospheric temperature’, J. Clim. 18, 3672–3691.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Haynes, P. H.: 2005, ‘Stratospheric dynamics’, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 263–293.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Held, I. M., and Suarez, M. J.: 1994, ‘A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models’, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 75, 1825–1830.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoskins, B. J., and Simmons, A. J.: 1975, ‘A multi-layer spectral model and the semi-implicit method’, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 101, 637–655.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Kushner, P. J., and Polvani, L. M.: 2004, ‘Stratosphere-troposphere coupling in a relatively simple AGCM: the role of eddies’, J. Climate 17, 629–639.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Larkin, A., Haigh, J. D., and Djavidnia, S.: 2000, ‘The effect of solar UV irradiance variations on the Earth's atmosphere’, Space Sci. Rev. 94, 199–214.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Matthes K., Langematz, U., Gray, L. J., Kodera, K., and Labitzke, K.: 2004, ‘Improved 11-year solar signal in the freie universitaet Berlin climate middle atmosphere model (FUB-CMAM)’, J. Geophys. Res. 109, doi:10.1029/2003JD004012.Google Scholar
  14. Polvani, L. M., and Kushner, P. J.: 2002, ‘Tropospheric response to stratospheric perturbations in a relatively simple general circulation model’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 10.1029/2001GL014284.Google Scholar
  15. Rind, D., and Balachandran, N. K.: 1995, ‘Modeling the effects of UV variability and the QBO on the troposphere-stratosphere system, Part II: the troposphere’, J. Clim. 8, 2080–2095.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Shindell, D., Rind, D., Balachandran, N., Lean, J., and Lonergan, P.: 1999, ‘Solar cycle variability, ozone, and climate’, Science 284, 305–308.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Simmons, A. J., and Burridge, D. M.: 1981, ‘An energy and angular-momentum conserving vertical finite-difference scheme and hybrid vertical coordinates’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 109, 758–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. van Loon, H., and Shea, D.: 2000, ‘The global 11-year signal in July-August’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2965–2968.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Blackett LaboratoryImperial College of Science, Technology and MedicineLondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Global Atmospheric ModellingUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations