On the Response of the Climate System to Solar Forcing
- 70 Downloads
The climate response to changes in radiative forcing depends crucially on climate feedback processes, with the consequence that solar and greenhouse gas forcing have both similar response patterns in the troposphere. This circumstance complicates significantly the attribution of the causes of climate change. Additionally, the climate system displays a high level of unforced intrinsic variability, and significant variations in the climate of many parts of the world are due to internal processes. Such internal modes contribute significantly to the variability of climate system on various time scales, and thus compete with external forcing in explaining the origin of past climate extremes. This highlights the need for independent observations of solar forcing including long-term consistent observational records of the total and spectrally resolved solar irradiance. The stratospheric response to solar forcing is different from its response to greenhouse gas forcing, thus suggesting that stratospheric observations could offer the best target for the identification of the specific influence of solar forcing on climate.
Keywordssolar forcing climate change climate variability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K.I., Roeckner, E., and Brokopf, R.: 2006, ‘On the natural variability of the pre-industrial European climate’, Climate Dynamics, in press.Google Scholar
- Boer, G., and Yu, B.: 2003, ‘Climate sensitivity and response’, Climate Dyn. 20, doi:10.1007/s00382-002-0283-3.Google Scholar
- Delworth, T.L., and Knutson, T.R.: ‘Simulation of early 20th century global warming’, Science 287, 2246–2250.Google Scholar
- Fröhlich, C.: 2006, ‘Solar irradiance variability since 1978’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume, doi: 10.1007/s11214-006-9046-5.Google Scholar
- Hoyt, D.V., and Schatten, K.H.: 1993, ‘A discussion of plausible solar irradiance variations, 1700–1992’, J.Geophys. Res. 98, 18,895–18,906.Google Scholar
- Hurrell, J.W., Kushnir, Y., Ottersen, G., and Visbeck, M.: 2003, ‘The North Atlantic Oscillation: climate significance and environmental impact’, Geophysical Monograph Series 134, 279 pp.Google Scholar
- IPCC: 2001, ‘Climate change 2001: The scientific basis’, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 881 pp.Google Scholar
- Jungclaus, J., Botzet, M., Haak, H., Keenlyside, N., Luo, J.-J., Latif, M., Marotzke, J., Mikolajewicz, U., and Roeckner, E.: 2006, ‘Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the coupled model ECHAM5/MPI-OM’, J.Climate 06, in press.Google Scholar
- Lean, J.L., Wang, Y.M., and Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 2002, ‘The effect of increasing solar activity on the sun's total and open magnetic flux during multiple cycles: Implications for solar forcing of climate’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, doi:10.1029/2002GL015880.Google Scholar
- Xoplaki, E, Luterbacher, J., Paeth, H., Dietrich, D., Steiner, N., Grosjean, M., and Wanner, H.: 2005, ‘European spring and autumn temperature variability and change of extremes over the last half millennium’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, doi:10.1029/2005GL023424.Google Scholar