Space Science Reviews

, Volume 125, Issue 1–4, pp 187–197 | Cite as

On the Response of the Climate System to Solar Forcing

Introductory Paper
Article

Abstract

The climate response to changes in radiative forcing depends crucially on climate feedback processes, with the consequence that solar and greenhouse gas forcing have both similar response patterns in the troposphere. This circumstance complicates significantly the attribution of the causes of climate change. Additionally, the climate system displays a high level of unforced intrinsic variability, and significant variations in the climate of many parts of the world are due to internal processes. Such internal modes contribute significantly to the variability of climate system on various time scales, and thus compete with external forcing in explaining the origin of past climate extremes. This highlights the need for independent observations of solar forcing including long-term consistent observational records of the total and spectrally resolved solar irradiance. The stratospheric response to solar forcing is different from its response to greenhouse gas forcing, thus suggesting that stratospheric observations could offer the best target for the identification of the specific influence of solar forcing on climate.

Keywords

solar forcing climate change climate variability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K.I., Roeckner, E., and Brokopf, R.: 2006, ‘On the natural variability of the pre-industrial European climate’, Climate Dynamics, in press.Google Scholar
  2. Boer, G., and Yu, B.: 2003, ‘Climate sensitivity and response’, Climate Dyn. 20, doi:10.1007/s00382-002-0283-3.Google Scholar
  3. Crowley, T.J.: 2000, ‘Causes of climate change over the last 2000 years’, Science 289, 270–277.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Cubasch, U., and Voss, R.: 2000, ‘The influence of total solar irradiance on climate’, Space Sci. Rev. 94, 185–198.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Delworth, T.L., and Knutson, T.R.: ‘Simulation of early 20th century global warming’, Science 287, 2246–2250.Google Scholar
  6. Eddy, J.: 1976, ‘The late maunder minimum’, Science 192, 1189–1202.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Fröhlich, C.: 2006, ‘Solar irradiance variability since 1978’, Space Sci. Rev., this volume, doi: 10.1007/s11214-006-9046-5.Google Scholar
  8. Gerber, E.P., and Vallis, G.K.: 2005, ‘A stochastic model for the spatial structure of annular patterns of variability and the north atlantic oscillation’, J.Climate 18, 2102–2118.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen, J., Sato, M., and Ruedy, R.: 1997, ‘Radiative forcing and climate response’, J.Geophys. Res. 192, 6831–6864.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasselmann, K.: 1976, ‘Stochastic climate models. Part 1: Theory’, Tellus 28, 273–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Held, I.M.: 2005, ‘The gap between simulation and understanding in climate Modeling’, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 86, 1609–1614.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoyt, D.V., and Schatten, K.H.: 1993, ‘A discussion of plausible solar irradiance variations, 1700–1992’, J.Geophys. Res. 98, 18,895–18,906.Google Scholar
  13. Hurrell, J.W., Kushnir, Y., Ottersen, G., and Visbeck, M.: 2003, ‘The North Atlantic Oscillation: climate significance and environmental impact’, Geophysical Monograph Series 134, 279 pp.Google Scholar
  14. IPCC: 2001, ‘Climate change 2001: The scientific basis’, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. A. Johnson (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 881 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, P.D., and Moberg, A.: 2003, ‘Hemispheric and large-scale surface air temperature variations: an extensive revision and an update to 2001’, J.Climate 16, 206–223.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Jungclaus, J., Botzet, M., Haak, H., Keenlyside, N., Luo, J.-J., Latif, M., Marotzke, J., Mikolajewicz, U., and Roeckner, E.: 2006, ‘Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the coupled model ECHAM5/MPI-OM’, J.Climate 06, in press.Google Scholar
  17. Lean, J., 2000: ‘Evolution of the Suns spectral Irradiance since the maunder minimum’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 2425–2428.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Lean, J., Beer, J., and Bradley, R.: 1995, ‘Reconstruction of solar irradiance since 1610: Implications for climate change’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 3195–3198.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Lean, J.L., Wang, Y.M., and Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 2002, ‘The effect of increasing solar activity on the sun's total and open magnetic flux during multiple cycles: Implications for solar forcing of climate’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, doi:10.1029/2002GL015880.Google Scholar
  20. Loptien, U., and Ruprecht, E.: 2005, ‘Effects of synoptic systems on the variability of the north atlantic oscillation’, Mon. Weather Rev. 133, 2894–2904.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Luterbacher, J., Dietrich, D., Xoplaki, E., Grosjean, M., and Wanner, H.: 2004, ‘European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends and extremes since 1500’, Science 303, 1499–break 1503.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Manabe, S., and Stouffer, R.J.: 1996, ‘Low-frequency variability of surface air temperature in a 1000-year integration of a coupled atmosphere-ocean-land surface model’, J.Climate 9, 376–393.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Oldenborgh, van G.J., Philip, S., and Collins, M.: 2005, ‘El Nino in a changing climate: A multi-model study’, Ocean Science 1, 81–95.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Räisänen, J.: 2002, ‘CO-Induced changes in interannual temperature and precipitation variability in 19 cmip2 experiments’, J.Climate 15, 2395–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rind, D.: 2002, ‘The Sun's role in climate variations’, Science 296, 673–677.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Shindell, D.T., Schmidt, G.A., Mann, M.E., Rind, D., and Waple, A.: 2001, ‘Solar forcing of regional climate change during the maunder minimum’, Science 294, 2149–2152.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Stephens, G.L.: 2005, ‘Cloud feedbacks in the climate system: a critical review’, J.Climate 18, 237–273.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson, D.W.J., Baldwin, M.P., and Solomon, S.: 2005, ‘Stratosphere–troposphere coupling in the southern hemisphere’, J.Atmos. Sci. 62, 708–715.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, Y., Lean, J.L., and Sheeley, N.R. Jr.: 2005, ‘Modeling the Sun's magnetic field since 1713’, Astrophys.J. 625, 522–538.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Xoplaki, E, Luterbacher, J., Paeth, H., Dietrich, D., Steiner, N., Grosjean, M., and Wanner, H.: 2005, ‘European spring and autumn temperature variability and change of extremes over the last half millennium’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, doi:10.1029/2005GL023424.Google Scholar
  31. Zebiak, S.E. and Cane, M.A.: 1987, ‘A model El Nino – Southern oscillation’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 2262–2278.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für MeteorologieHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Environmental System Science CenterUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations