Space Science Reviews

, Volume 116, Issue 3–4, pp 497–521

Critical Issues on Magnetic Reconnection in Space Plasmas

  • A. T. Y. Lui
  • C. Jacquey
  • G. S. Lakhina
  • R. Lundin
  • T. Nagai
  • T.-D. Phan
  • Z. Y. Pu
  • M. Roth
  • Y. Song
  • R. A. Treumann
  • M. Yamauchi
  • L. M. Zelenyi
Article

Abstract

The idea of expedient energy transformation by magnetic reconnection (MR) has generated much enthusiasm in the space plasma community. The early concept of MR, which was envisioned for the solar flare phenomenon in a simple two-dimensional (2D) steady-state situation, is in dire need for extension to encompass three-dimensional (3D) non-steady-state phenomena prevalent in space plasmas in nature like in the magnetosphere. A workshop was organized to address this and related critical issues on MR. The essential outcome of this workshop is summarized in this review. After a brief evaluation on the pros and cons of existing definitions of MR, we propose essentially a working definition that can be used to identify MR in transient and spatially localized phenomena. The word “essentially” reflects a slight diversity in the opinion on how transient and localized 3D MR process might be defined. MR is defined here as a process with the following characteristics: (1) there is a plasma bulk flow across a boundary separating regions with topologically different magnetic field lines if projected on the plane of MR, thereby converting magnetic energy into kinetic particle energy, (2) there can be an out-of-the-plane magnetic field component (the so-called guide field) present such that the reconnected magnetic flux tubes are twisted to form flux ropes, and (3) the region exhibiting non-ideal MHD conditions should be localized to a scale comparable to the ion inertial length in the direction of the plasma inflow velocity. This definition captures the most important 3D aspects and preserves many essential characteristics of the 2D case. It may be considered as the first step in the generalization of the traditional 2D concept. As a demonstration on the utility of this definition, we apply it to identify MR associated with plasma phenomena in the dayside magnetopause and nightside magnetotail of the Earth’s magnetosphere. How MR may be distinguished from other competing mechanisms for these magnetospheric phenomena are then discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfvén, H.: 1981, Cosmic plasma, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  2. Alfvén, H. and Fälthammar, C.-G.: 1963, in: International Series of Monographs on Physics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Axford, W. I.: 1984, in: E. W. Hones (ed.), Magnetic Reconnection, AGU Monograph 30, American Geophysical Union, Washington, p. 1.Google Scholar
  4. Bale, S. D., Mozer, F. S., and Phan, T. D.: 2002, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(24), 2180, doi: 10.1029/2002GL016113.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, T. M., Paschmann, G., Sckopke, N., Baumjohann, W., Treumann, R. A., and Phan, T. D.: 1998, in: J. L. Horwitz, D. L. Gallagher and W. K. Peterson (eds.), Geospace Mass and Energy Flow: Results from the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics Program, Geophysical Monograph 104, p. 51.Google Scholar
  6. Biskamp, D.: 2000, Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Cheng, C. Z. and Lui, A. T. Y.: 1998, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 4091–4094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppi, B., Laval, G., and Pellat, R.: 1966, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowley, S. W. H.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 3455.Google Scholar
  10. Cowley, S. W. H.: 1982, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 531.Google Scholar
  11. De Keyser, J., Darrouzet, F., Roth, M., Vaisberg, O. L., Rybjeva, N., Smirnov, V., Avanov, L., Nemecek, Z., and Safrankova, J.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25503.Google Scholar
  12. De Keyser, J. and Roth, M.: 2003, Planet. Space Sci. 51, 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng, X. H. and Matsumoto, H.: 2001, Nature 410, 557–559.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Drake, J. F.: 2001, Nature 410, 525–526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Drake, J. F., Swisdak, M., Cattell, C., Shay, M. A., Rodgers, B. N., and Zeiler, A.: 2003, Science 299, 873–877.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dungey, J. W.: 1961, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47–48.Google Scholar
  17. Forbes, T. G. and Priest, E. R.: 1987, Rev. Geophys. 25, 1583–1607.Google Scholar
  18. Frey, H. U., Phan, T. D., Fuselier, S. A., and Mende, S. B.: 2003, Nature 426, 533–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fujimoto, M., et al.: 1997, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2893–2896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujimoto, M., Nagai, T., Yokokawa, N., Yamade, Y., Mukai, T., Saito, Y., and Kokubun, S.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 21255.Google Scholar
  21. Fuselier, S. A., Klumpar, D. M., and Shelly, E. G.: 1991, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 139.Google Scholar
  22. Fuselier, S. A., Anderson, B. J., and Onsager, T. G.: 1995, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 11805.Google Scholar
  23. Fuselier, S. A., Anderson, B. J., and Onsager, T. G.: 1997, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 4847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galeev, A. A., Kuznetsova, M. M., and Zeleny, L. M.: 1986, Space Sci. Rev. 44, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giovanelli, R. G.: 1946, Nature 158, 81.Google Scholar
  26. Gosling, J. T., Asbridge, J. R., Bame, S. J., Feldman, W. C., Paschmann, G., Sckopke, N., and Russell, C. T.: 1982, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 2147–2158.Google Scholar
  27. Gosling, J. T., Thomsen, M. F., Bame, S. J., Elphic, R. C., and Russell, C. T.: 1990, Geophys. Res. Lett. 17, 2245.Google Scholar
  28. Gosling, J. T., Thomsen, M. F., Bame, S. J., Elphic, R. C., and Russell, C. T.: 1991, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 14097.Google Scholar
  29. Greene, J. M.: 1988, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 8583.Google Scholar
  30. Heikkila, W. J.: 1990, Space Sci. Rev. 53, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Heikkila, W. J.: 1998, Space Sci. Rev. 83, 373–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heikkila, W. J.: 2003a, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 8–18.Google Scholar
  33. Jacquey, C.: 2003, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 49–53.Google Scholar
  34. Jacquey, C., Sauvaud, J. A., and Dandouras, J.: 1991, Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 389–392.Google Scholar
  35. Jacquey, C., Sauvaud, J. A., Dandouras, J., and Korth, A.: 1993, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 983– 986.Google Scholar
  36. Jaroschek, C. H., Treumann, R. A., Lesch, H., and Scholer, M.: 2004, Phys. Plasmas 11(4), 1–13, doi: 10.1063/1.1644814.Google Scholar
  37. Lakhina, G. S., Tsurutani, B. T., Kojima, H., and Matsumoto, H.: 2000, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 27791–27831.Google Scholar
  38. Lakhina, G. S.: 2000, Bull. Astron. Soc. India 28, 593–646.Google Scholar
  39. Lemaire, J. and Roth, M.: 1978, J. Atm. Terr. Phys. 40, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Livesey, W. A. and Pritchett, P. L.: 1989, Phys. Fluids B 1, 914–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lui, A. T. Y.: 2000, Magnetospheric Current Systems, AGU Monograph 118, AGU, Washington, DC, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
  42. Lui, A. T. Y., Yoon, P.H., and Chang, C.-L.: 1993, J. Geophys. Res. 98, 153.Google Scholar
  43. Lui, A. T. Y.: 2003, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 54–59.Google Scholar
  44. Lundin, R., Nilsson, H., and Yamauchi, M.: 2003a, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  45. Lundin, R., Sauvaud, J.-A., Rème, H., Balogh, A., Dandouras, I., Bosqued, J. M., Carlson, C., Parks, G. K., Möbius, E., Kistler, L. M., Klecker, B., Amata, E., Formisano, V., Dunlop, M., Eliasson, L., Korth, A., Lavraud, B., and McCarthy, M.: 2003b, Ann. Geophysicae 21, 457–472.Google Scholar
  46. Lundin, R., Yamauchi, M., Reme, H., Sauvaud, J.-A., Lavraud, B., Balogh, A., McDonell, M., and Phan, T.: 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett. in press.Google Scholar
  47. Lyons, L. R. and Pridmore-Brown, D. C.: 1990, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 20903.Google Scholar
  48. Mitchell, D. G., Kutchko, F., Williams, D. J., Eastman, T. E., Frank, L. A., and Russell, C. T.: 1987, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 7394.Google Scholar
  49. Mozer, F. S., Bale, S. D., and Phan, T. D.: 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 015002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagai, T.: 2003, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proc. Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
  51. Nagai, T., Fujimoto, M., Saito, Y., Machida, S., Terasawa, T., Nakamura, R., Yamamoto, T., Mukai, T., Nishida, A., and Kokubun, S.: 1998, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 4419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nagai, T., Shinohara, I., Fujimoto, M., Moshino, M., Saito, Y., Machida, S., and Mukai, T.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25929–25949.Google Scholar
  53. Newcomb, W. A.: 1958, Ann. Phys. 3, 347–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ohtani, S., Takahashi, K., and Russell, C.T.: 1992, J. Geophys. Res. 97, 3129–3136.Google Scholar
  55. Øieroset, M., Phan, T.D., Fujimoto, M., Lin, R. P., and Lepping, R. P.: 2001, Nature 412, 414–417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Parker, E. N.: 1957, J. Geophys. Res. 62, 509–520.Google Scholar
  57. Parker, E. N.: 1963, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 8, 177–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parnell, C. E.: 2000, in: J.-P. Rozelot, L. Klein and J.-C. Vial (eds.), Transport and Energy Conversion in the Heliosphere, Lecture Notes in Physics, Springer, pp. 61–97.Google Scholar
  59. Paschmann, G., Sonnerup, B.Ü., Papamastorakis, I., Sckopke, N., Haerendel, G., Bame, S. J., Asbridge, J. R., Gosling, J. T., Russell, C. T., and Elphic, R. C.: 1979, Nature 282, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Petschek, H. E.: 1964, in: W.N. Hess (ed.), AAS-NASA Symposium on the Physics of Solar Flares, US Government Printing Office, pp. 425–437.Google Scholar
  61. Phan, T.-D., Larson, D., McFadden, J., Lin, R. P., Carlson, C., Moyer, M., Paularena, K. I., McCarthy, M., Parks, G. K., Rème, H., Sanderson, T. R., and Lepping, R. P.: 1997, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 19883.Google Scholar
  62. Phan, T. D., Kistler, L. M., Klecker, B., Haerendel, G., Paschmann, G., Sonnerup, B. U.Ö., Baumjohann, W., Bavassano-Cattaneo, M. B., Carlson, C. W., DiLellis, A. M., Fornacon, K.-H., Frank, L. A., Fujimoto, M., Georgescu, E., Kokubun, S., Moebius, E., Mukai, T., Øieroset, M., Paterson, W. R., and Réme, H.: 2000, Nature 404, 848–850.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Phan, T. D., Sonnerup, B. U.Ö., and Lin, R. P.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 25489.Google Scholar
  64. Phan, T., Frey, H. U., Frey, S., Peticolas, L., Fuselier, S., Carlson, C., Rème, H., Bosqued, J.-M., Balogh, A., Dunlop, M., Kistler, L., Mouikis, C., Dandouras, I., Sauvaud, J.-A., Mende, S., McFadden, J., Parks, G., Moebius, E., Klecker, B., Paschmann, G., Fujimoto, M., Petrinec, S., Marcucci, M. F., Korth, A., and Lundin, R.: 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(10), 1599, doi: 10.1029/2003GL016885.Google Scholar
  65. Pritchett, P. L. and Coroniti, F. V.: 2004, J. Geophys. Res. 109, A01220, doi: 10.1029/2003JA009999.Google Scholar
  66. Pu, Z. Y., Xiao, C. J., Zong, Q. G., Fritz, T., Huang, Z. Y., Fu, S. Y., Dunlop, M. W., Cai, C. L., Cao, J. B., Liu, Z. X., Daly, P., Balogh, A., and Rème, H.: 2003, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 60–64.Google Scholar
  67. Roth, M.: 2003, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
  68. Runov, A., Nakamura, R., Baumjohann, W., Treumann, R. A., Zhang, T. L., Volwerk, M., Vörös, Z., Balogh, A., Glaß meier, K.-H., Klecker, B., Rème, H., and Kistler, L.: 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30(11), doi: 10.1029/2002GL016730.Google Scholar
  69. Russell, C. T. and Elphic, R. C.: 1978, Space Sci. Rev. 22, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schindler, K., Hesse, M., and Birn, J.: 1988, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 5547.Google Scholar
  71. Scholer, M. and Treumann, R. A.: 1997, Space Sci. Rev. 80, 341–367.Google Scholar
  72. Scholer, M., Sidorenko, I., Jaroschek, C. H., Treumann, R. A., and Zeiler, A.: 2003, Phys. Plasmas 10, 3521–3527, doi: 10.1063/1.1597494.Google Scholar
  73. Scudder, J. D., Mozer, F. S., Maynard, N. C., and Russell, C. T.: 2002, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1294, doi: 10.1029/2001JA000126.Google Scholar
  74. Shay, M. A., Drake, J. F., Denton, R. E., and Biskamp, D.: 1998, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 9165.Google Scholar
  75. Shinohara, I., Sizuki, H., Fujimoto, M., and Hoshino, M.: 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(9), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.095001.Google Scholar
  76. Sitnov, M. I., and Lui, A. T. Y.: 1999, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 6941–6951.Google Scholar
  77. Song, Y.: 1988, Self-Organization Process and Anomalous Transport in the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  78. Song, Y.: 2003, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 25–35.Google Scholar
  79. Song, Y. and Lysak, R. L.: 1989, Geophys. Res. Lett. 16, 911–914.Google Scholar
  80. Song, Y. and Lysak, R. L.: 2000, in: S.-I. Ohtani, et al. (eds.), Magnetospheric Current Systems, AGU Monograph 118, American Geophysical Union, Washington, p. 11.Google Scholar
  81. Sonnerup, B. U.Ö.: 1979, in L. J. Lanzerotti, C. F. Kennel, and E. N. Parker (eds.), Solar Systems Plasma Physics, Vol. 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 45–108.Google Scholar
  82. Sonnerup, B. U.Ö.: 1984, in: E. W. Hones, Jr. (ed.), Magnetic Reconnection, AGU Monograph 30, American Geophysical Union, Washington, p. 92.Google Scholar
  83. Sonnerup, B. U.Ö., et al.: 1984, in: D. M. Butler and K. Papadopoulos (eds.), Solar Terrestrial Physics: Present and Future, NASA Ref. Publ. Vol. 1130, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  84. Sonnerup, B. U.Ö., et al.: 1981, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 10049–10067.Google Scholar
  85. Stasiewicz, K.: 1991, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 77–86.Google Scholar
  86. Sweet, P. A.: 1958, in: B. Lehnert (ed.), Electromagetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  87. Traver, D. P., Mitchell, D. G., Williams, D. J. Frank, L. A.: 1991, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 21025.Google Scholar
  88. Treumann, R. A. and Baumjohann, W.: 1988, Planet. Space Sci. 36, 1477–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Treumann, R. A., LaBelle, J., and Bauer, T. M.: 1995, in: B. Sonnerup, P. Song, and M. Thomsen (eds.), Physics of the Magnetopause, Geophysics Monograph, 90, pp. 331–341.Google Scholar
  90. Treumann, R. A., Baumjohann, W., Nakamura, R., and Runov, A.: 2003, ‘The Hall physics of reconnection in the magnetospheric tail’, Cluster-Tail workshop, Graz.Google Scholar
  91. Tur, A., Louarn, O., Yanovsky, V., LeQuéau, D., and Génot, V.: 2001, J. Plasma Physics 66, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vaivads, A., André, M., Buchert, S. C., Wahlund, J.-E., Fazakerley, A. N., and Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N.: 2004, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L03804, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018142.Google Scholar
  93. Vasyliunas, V. M.: 1975, Rev. Geophys. 13, 303.Google Scholar
  94. Yamada, M., Ji, H., Hsu, S., Carter, T., Kulsrud, R., Bretz, N., Jobes, F., Ono, Y., and Perkins, F.: 1997, Phys. Plasmas 4, 1936–1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yamauchi, M.: 2003, in: R. Lundin and R. Mc Gregor (eds.), Proceedings of the Magnetic Reconnection Meeting, IRF Scientific Report 280, ISSN 0284-1703, Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
  96. Yamauchi, M., Lundin, R., Norberg, O., Sandahl, I., Elliasson, L., and Winningham, D.: 2003, in: P.T. Newell and T. Onsager (eds.), Earth’s Low Latitude Boundary Layer, AGU Monograph 133, pp. 179–188.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. T. Y. Lui
    • 1
  • C. Jacquey
    • 2
  • G. S. Lakhina
    • 3
  • R. Lundin
    • 4
  • T. Nagai
    • 5
  • T.-D. Phan
    • 6
  • Z. Y. Pu
    • 7
  • M. Roth
    • 8
  • Y. Song
    • 9
  • R. A. Treumann
    • 10
  • M. Yamauchi
    • 4
  • L. M. Zelenyi
    • 11
  1. 1.Applied Physics LaboratoryLaurelUSA
  2. 2.Ctr. d’Etudes Spatiales RayonnementsToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Indian Institute of GeomagnetismMumbaiIndia
  4. 4.Swedish Institute of Space PhysicsKirunaSweden
  5. 5.Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan
  6. 6.Space Sciences LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  7. 7.School of Earth and Space SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina
  8. 8.Institut d’Aéronomie Spatiale de BelgiqueBrusselsBelgium
  9. 9.School Physics & Astronomy, Tate LaboratoryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  10. 10.CIPS/MPEMunichGermany
  11. 11.Russian Academy SciencesSpace Research InstituteMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations