Advertisement

Evolution of Management Cybernetics and Viable System Model

  • Amin VahidiEmail author
  • Alireza Aliahmad
  • Ebrahim Teimouri
Original Paper
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The Viable System Model have pulled in system specialists’ interests lately. This field could help system analyzers and designers to deal with systems unpredictability and help them to handle dynamic evolving situations. This paper investigates Viable System Model recorded and late research patterns. To start with, presenting and creating verifiable pattern of this model has been examined. At that point late distribution patterns have been checked on by reviewing 1000 most essential and cited works Based on Google Scholar rank. Cybernetics developed in the Josiah Macy conferences, beginning in 1946. At that point, Wiener presented the field of Cybernetics and Ashby, Von Forester, and McCulloch built up this field as a train. This Management Cybernetics was presented in 1959 by Beer is a blend of frameworks of control, and management sciences. Beer introduced VSM as an operational model here. Reviewing 1000 most cited publications demonstrates the presentation of this field achieved maturity and further advancement turned out to be generally under development. In addition, in view of investigated patterns, application of VSM model would now be able to be firmly alluring.

Keywords

Viable system model Variety Systems science, law of requisite variety 

Notes

References

  1. Ashby WR (1952a) Can a mechanical chess-player outplay its designer? Br J Philos Sci 3(9):44–57.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/III.9.44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashby WR (1952b) Design for a Brain. Chapman & Hall..  https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830260302/abstract
  3. Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. New York, J. Wiley (Vol. 16).  https://doi.org/10.2307/3006723
  4. Ashby WR (1958) Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1(2):83–99Google Scholar
  5. Ashby WR (1999) Design for a Brain an introduction to. Director 80(4):295.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3006723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beer S (1959) What has cybernetics to do with operational research? J Oper Res Soc 10(1):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1959.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beer S (1970) Brain of the firm: a development in management cybernetics. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  8. Beer S (1972) Brain of the firm: a development in management cybernetics. McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books/about/Brain_of_the_firm.html?id=T_A9AAAAIAAJ&pgis=1
  9. Beer S (1975) Platform for Change. WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. Beer S (1979) The heart of Enterprise. J Oper Res Soc Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2581902
  11. Beer S (1981) The Viable System Model: Its Provenance. Development, Methodology, and PathologyGoogle Scholar
  12. Beer S (1984) The viable system model: its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Oper Res Soc 35(1):7–25.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beer S (1994a) Beyond dispute: the invention of team Syntegrity. Wiley. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=VwVPAAAAMAAJ
  14. Beer S (1994b) Cybernetics of National Development evolved from work in Chile. In Zaheer Science Foundation. Retrieved from http://vidyardhi.org/Resources/books/beer.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2017
  15. Brecher C, Müller S, Breitbach T, Lohse W (2013) Viable system model for manufacturing execution systems. Procedia CIRP 7:461–466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conant RC, Ross Ashby W (1970) Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system†. Int J Syst Sci 1(2):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dominici G, Palumbo F (2013) Decoding the Japanese lean production system according to a viable systems perspective. Syst Pract Action Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9242-z
  18. Espejo R (2013) Organisational Cybernetics as a Systemic Paradigm : Lessons from the Past -Progress for the Future. Bus Syst Rev 2(2):1–9Google Scholar
  19. Espejo R, Harnden R (1990) The viable system model: interpretations of Stafford Beer’s VSM. Wiley (Vol. 44).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90368-L
  20. Espinosa A, Harnden R, Walker J (2008) A complexity approach to sustainability – Stafford Beer revisited. Eur J Oper Res 187(2):636–651.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Espinosa A, Reficco E, Martínez A, Guzmán D (2015) A methodology for supporting strategy implementation based on the VSM: a case study in a Latin-American multi-national. Eur J Oper Res 240(1):202–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flood RL, Jackson MC (1991) Critical systems thinking. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/b102400.pdf
  23. Haslett T (2000) Using VSM to integrate SD modelling into an organization contextGoogle Scholar
  24. Haslett T, Oka M (2000) Using VSM to integrate SD modelling into an organization context. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.143.33
  25. Hoverstadt P (2010) The viable system model. In Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide (pp. 87–133). Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_3
  26. Jackson MC (2007) Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers, vol. 6. WileyGoogle Scholar
  27. Leonard A (2009) The viable system model and its application to complex organizations. Syst Pract Action Res 22(4):223–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9126-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCulloch W (1965) Embodiments of mind. Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T. Press [©1965]. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/embodiments-mind-1
  29. Mignot P (2000) Metaphor: a paradigm for practice-based research into’career’. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713652314
  30. Mingers J (1980) Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology. J Appl Syst AnalGoogle Scholar
  31. Mingers J (1997a) Multi-paradigm multimethodologyGoogle Scholar
  32. Mingers J (1997b) Towards critical pluralismGoogle Scholar
  33. Mingers J (2000) What is it to be critical? undergraduates. Manag Learn 2000Google Scholar
  34. Mingers J (2001) Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology. Inf Syst Res 12(3):240–259.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.240.9709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mingers J (2006) Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science: knowledge and action in management scienceGoogle Scholar
  36. Mingers J (2010) Multimethodology. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management ScienceGoogle Scholar
  37. Mingers J, Brocklesby J (1997) Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega 25(5):489–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan G (1980) Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Adm Sci Q, 1980Google Scholar
  39. Munro I, Mingers J (2002) The use of multimethodology in practice—results of a survey of practitioners. J Oper Res SocGoogle Scholar
  40. Preece G, Shaw D, Hayashi H (2013) Using the viable system model (VSM) to structure information processing complexity in disaster response. Eur J Oper Res 224(1):209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Preece G, Shaw D, Hayashi H (2015) Application of the Viable System Model to analyze communications structures: A case study of disaster response in Japan. Eur J Oper ResGoogle Scholar
  42. Rahayu S, Zulhamdani M (2014) Understanding local innovation system as an intelligent organism using the viable system model case study of palm oil industry in North Sumatra Province. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 115:68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reyes A (2001) Second-order auditing practices. Syst Pract Action Res 14(2):157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwaninger M (2004) Methodologies in conflict: achieving synergies between system dynamics and organizational cybernetics. Syst Res Behav Sci 21(4):411–431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwaninger M (2006a) The evolution of organizational cybernetics. Scientiae Mathematicae JaponicaeGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwaninger M (2006b) Intelligent Organizations. Intelligent Organizations: Powerful Models for Systemic ManagementGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwaninger M, Ríos JP (2008) System dynamics and cybernetics: a synergetic pair. Syst Dyn Rev 24(2):145–174.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwaninger M, Scheef C (2016) A Test of the Viable System Model: Theoretical Claim vs. Empirical Evidence. Cybern Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2016.1209375
  49. Vahidi A, Aliahmadi A (2018) Describing the necessity of multi-methodological approach for viable system model: Case study of viable system model and system dynamics multi-methodology. Syst Pract Action Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9452-0
  50. Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics. Retrieved from http://ems.music.uiuc.edu/courses/tipei/I3/Notes/cybernetics.doc. Accessed 25 Oct 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amin Vahidi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alireza Aliahmad
    • 2
  • Ebrahim Teimouri
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Progress EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran
  2. 2.School of Industrial EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations