Advertisement

Promoting Entrepreneurship through a Community Learning Model – Case Study: Green Businesses

  • María Catalina Ramírez
  • Libia Alejandra Navas CastañoEmail author
  • Ángela Delgado
  • Miguel Angel González
  • Luis Camilo Caicedo
  • Mauricio Peralta
Original Paper
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

This article presents a community learning model formulated by Engineers Without Borders Colombia with the aim of providing communities with tools to create sustainable productive solutions which have relevancy for members and for potential customers. The goal of this formulation is to promote learning processes that are guided by decisions made by community members to propose sustainable and replicable initiatives. The model applicability is evidenced through a case study devoted to strengthening community-led green businesses in the Guavio Province, Colombia by collecting lessons and conclusions. Ultimately, this collection will prove useful in replicating the learning model in other similar rural communities.

Keywords

Green businesses Organizational learning Green entrepreneurship Guavio region Colombia Engineers without Borders Colombia 

Notes

References

  1. Alegre J, Chiva R, Lapiedra R (2007) Measuring organizational learning capability among the workforce. Int J Manpow 28(3/4):224–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali MM, Yadav SKS, Nedelea AM (2017) Practicing green business with special reference to India: perception and cognizance of researchers. Ecoforum 6(1)Google Scholar
  3. Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method and practice Reading. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassGoogle Scholar
  5. Baquero AF, Giraldo M, Guarín A (2010) ANÁLISIS DE LA CADENA DE SUMINISTRO DE FRUTAS Y VERDURAS PARA BOGOTÁ D.C. BogotáGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown T, Wyatt J (2010) Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved May 15, 2018 from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation
  7. Burns C, Cottam H, Vanstone C, Wihall J (2006) Red paper 02: transformation design. Design council, London. Retrieved December 6, 2018, from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/resources/report/red-paper-02-transformation-design
  8. Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá (2006) Descripción de la provincia del Guavio. Retrieved April 21, 2018, from https://isfcolombia.uniandes.edu.co/images/documentos/descripcionprovinciaguavio.pdf Google Scholar
  9. Čekanavičius L, Bazytė R, Dičmonaitė A (2014) Green business: challenges and practices. Ekonomika 93(1):74–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coghlan D, Shani A (2014) IDEA: a collaborative organizational design process integrating innovation, design, engagement, and action. Syst Pract Action Res 26:523–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Guerre D, Séguin D, Pace A, Burke N (2013) IDEA: a collaborative organizational design process integrating innovation, design, engagement, and action. Syst Pract Action Res 26:257–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncan RB, Weiss A (1979) Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In: Staw B (ed) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, p 75–123Google Scholar
  13. Espejo R, Schuhmann W, Schwaninger M, Bilello U (1996) Organizational transformation and learning. John Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Estensoro M (2015) How can social innovation be facilitated? Experiences from an action research process in a local network. Syst Pract Action Res 28:527–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fontaine SJ (2006) Integrating community-based participatory research into the curriculum. JHEOE 11(2):45–57Google Scholar
  16. Friend G (2009) The Truth about Green Business, 1st edn. Pearson Education, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  17. Freitas H, Jenkins M, Oliveira M, Popjoy O (1998) The Focus Group, a qualitative research method. ISRC, Merrick School of Business, University of Baltimore (MD, EUA)Google Scholar
  18. Garzón MA, Fisher AL (2008) Modelo teórico de aprendizaje organizacional. Pensamiento & Gestión. Redalyc 24:195–224Google Scholar
  19. Gillis A, Jackson W (2002) Research for nurses: methods and interpretation. F.A. Davis Company, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  20. Ha TM, Bosch OJ, Nguyen NC (2016) Practical contributions of the systems-based evolutionary learning laboratory to knowledge and stakeholder management. Syst Pract Action Res 29:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansson T (2006) Workplace logics, kinds of knowledge and action research. Syst Pract Action Res 19:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hara K, Kumazawa T, Kimura M, Tsuda K (2016) Participatory approach in vision setting: emerging initiatives in local municipalities in Japan. Sustain Sci 11:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobs S (2016) The use of participatory action research within education-benefits to stakeholders. World Journal of Education 6(3):48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (2007) Participatory action research: communicative action and the public sphere. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Strategies of qualitative inquiry. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 271–330Google Scholar
  25. Kim DH (1993) The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Manag RevGoogle Scholar
  26. Kofman F (1992) Lecture slides. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  27. Li M (2002) Fostering design culture through cultivating the user-Designer’s design thinking and systems thinking. Syst Pract Action Res 15(5):385–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacDonald C (2012) Understanding participatory action research: a qualitative research methodology option. Canadian Journal of Action Research 13(2):34–50Google Scholar
  29. March J, Olsen J (1975) The uncertainty of the past: organizational learning under ambiguity. Eur J Polit Res:147–171Google Scholar
  30. Marshall C, Rossman G (2006) Designing qualitative research, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller TR, Wick A, Sarewitz D, Robinson J, Olsson L, Kriebel D, Loorbach D (2013) The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda. Sustain Sci 9(2):239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Narayan D (2002) Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Sourcebook. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. Retrieved May 15, 2018 from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15239 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO
  33. Network of Community Exchange Systems in Asia, Africa & Latin America (2002) Retrieved february 10, 2018, from http://appropriate-economics.org/materials/Community_Exchange_Systems_screen.pdf
  34. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Pardo C, Alfonso W (2015) Analysis of the primary causes of business failure in Colombia. Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D.C.Google Scholar
  36. Park P (1993) What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. Participatory Research in the United States and Canada, Voices of ChangeGoogle Scholar
  37. Prange C (1999) Organizational learning - desperately seeking theory? In: Easterby-Smith M, Burgoyne J, Araujo L (eds) Organizational learning and the learning organisation. Sage, London, pp 23–43Google Scholar
  38. Singh P (2010) Intercultural communication using an action research approach. Syst Pract Action Res 23:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith SE (2003) What is green business? Retrieved January 18, 2019, from https://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-green-business.htm
  40. Smith EE, Perks S (2010) A perceptual study of the impact of green practice implementation on the business functions. Southern African Business Review 14(3):1–29Google Scholar
  41. Styhre A, Sundgren M (2005) Action research as experimentation. Syst Pract Action Res 18(1):53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. United Nations (2013) World Economic and Social Survey 2013Google Scholar
  43. United Nations (2014) Más de la mitad de la población vive en áreas urbanas y seguirá creciendo. Obtenido de Naciones Unidas. Retrieved November 30, 2018 from http://www.un.org/es/development/desa/news/population/world-urbanization-prospects-2014.html
  44. Uribe D (2018) What is Going on with Stakeholders Theory in Project Management Literature? 1–23. Sustainability (Switzerland)Google Scholar
  45. Varela R, Moreno J, Bedoya M (2015) GEM Colombia 2006–2013. Universidad Icesi, Santiago de CaliGoogle Scholar
  46. Vargas Z (2009) La investigación aplicada: una forma de conocer las realidades con evidencia científica. Revista Educación. Redalyc 33(1):155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Los AndesBogotaColombia
  2. 2.University of Exeter (2016)ExeterUK
  3. 3.Social Innovation Science ParkMinuto de Dios Corporate UniversityBogotaColombia
  4. 4.Engineering FacultyUniversity of los AndesBogotaColombia

Personalised recommendations