Advertisement

Systemic Change in a Higher Education Institution: Inquiring into Organizational and Instructional Transformation

  • Ömer Faruk İpekEmail author
  • A. Cendel Karaman
Original Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Changes often occur in organizational systems due to the technology, new methods, new understandings and emerging needs. This study examined the reasons, components, roles of the people involved and results of the systemic change process at a university preparatory department by using a self-initiated, prescriptive, and planned systemic change process. The aim of the study is to investigate how the planned systemic change initiative was processed and implemented. Data were collected over a two-year period. Data sources included documents, field notes based on observations, focus group interviews with alumni, and semi-structured interviews with stakeholders within the institution. Systems and systemic change conceptual frameworks guided the interpretative analysis of data. Findings showed that the system requires powerful reasons for change and there needs to be change in the components of the system such as organization, curriculum, communication and assessment. The analysis also highlighted the crucial role individuals play in the systemic change process. In this systemic change inquiry, a transformational pattern within the organizational and instructional domains emerged. The five main themes that relate to this process were: motivation, standards, structural change, whole school involvement and leadership.

Keywords

Systemic change Organizational change Higher education English language education institutions 

Notes

References

  1. Adams KM, Hester PT (2012) Errors in systems approaches. International Journal of System of Systems Engineering 3(3–4):233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akpur U, Alcı B, Karataş H (2016) Evaluation of the curriculum of English preparatory classes at Yildiz Technical University using CIPP model. Educational Research and Reviews 11(7):466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akşit N (2007) Educational reform in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development 27(2):129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albrecht DL (2015) An exploratory model of ESL program leadership. INTESOL Journal 12(2): 86-107Google Scholar
  5. Angrosino M (2007) Doing ethnographic and observational research. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Banathy BH (1991) Systems design of education: a journey to create the future. Educational Technology Publications. New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Banathy BH (1995) Developing a systems view of education. Educational Technology 35(3):53–57Google Scholar
  8. Banathy BH, Jenlink PM (2013) Systems inquiry and its application in education. In: Jonassen DH, Harris P (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Erlbaum, Mahwah, 37–57Google Scholar
  9. Berends H, Boersma K, Weggeman M (2003) The structuration of organizational learning. Human Relations 56(9):1035–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. British Council (2015) Türkiyede yüksek öğretim kurumlarındaki ingilizce eğitimi. TEPAV. Ankara Google Scholar
  11. Cao G, McHugh M (2005) A systemic view of change management and its conceptual underpinnings. Systemic Practice and Action Research 18(5):475-490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. deSegovia LP, Hardison DM (2009) Implementing education reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives. ELT Journal 63(2):154–162Google Scholar
  14. Duffy FM, Chance PL, Reigeluth CM, Watson SL, Adcock A (2010) 2009 AECT international convention committee, division and society reports. TechTrends 54(2):28-39Google Scholar
  15. Flood RL (2010) The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research 23(4):269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frick TW, Reigeluth CM (1999) Formative research: A methodology for improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Volume II). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 633–652Google Scholar
  17. Fullan M (2000) The return of large-scale reform. Journal of Educational Change 1(1):5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fullan M (2009) Large-scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educatioanal Change 10(2-3):101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gergen KJ (1999) An invitation to social construction. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Gudz NA (2004) Implementing the sustainable development policy at the University of British Columbia: an analysis of the implications for organizational learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 5(2):156–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall GE, Hord SM (2015) Implementing change: patterns, principles, and polothes. Pearson/Allyn Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris A (2010) Leading system transformation. School Leaders Management 30(3):197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hines EM, Moore III J L, Mayes RD, Harris P C, Vega D, Robinson DV, Jackson CE (2017) Making student achievement a priority: the role of school counselors in turnaround schools. Urban Education 55(2):216-237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holmes K, Clement J, Albright J (2013) The complex task of leading educational change in schools. School Leaders Management 33(3):270–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. İpek ÖF (2017) Investigation of systemic change at a university preparatory language department: The northview case. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  26. James M, Card K (2012) Factors contributing to institutions achieving environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 13(2):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jenkins B (2009) What it takes to be an instructional leader. Principal 88(3):34–37Google Scholar
  28. Jenlink PM, Reigeluth CM, Carr AA, Nelson LM (1996) An expedition for change: facilitating the systemic change process in school districts. TechTrends 41(1):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joseph R (2003) Formative research on a design theory to facilitate systemic change in public school districts. (Dissertation). Indiana State University, Missouri, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Joseph R, Reigeluth CM (2010) The systemic change process in education: a conceptual framework. Contemporary Educational Technology 1(2):97–117Google Scholar
  31. Jun L, Liangrong X (2011) A new model in English language teaching in China: the case of Shantou University. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistiscs 34(3):39–53Google Scholar
  32. Karaman AC (2010) Systems thinking for studying international professional program participants’ thoughts. Syst Pract Action Res 23(3):203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karip E, Köksal K (1996) Etkili eğitim sistemlerinin geliştirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi 2(2): 245–257Google Scholar
  34. Kasa B, Ersöz Y (2016) Pros and cons: compulsory 12 year education reform in Turkey. South African Journal of Education 36(2):1-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laing K, Todd L (eds) (2015) Theory-based methodology: using theories of change in educational development, research and evaluation. Research Centre for Learning and Teaching, Newcastle University, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McKeown J (2016) From “sage on the stage to guide on the side”: a case study of a transition to flipped English language learning in a higher education setting in Turkey. ELT Research Journal 5(2):145-154Google Scholar
  38. Mink OG, Mink BP, Downes EA, Owen KQ (1994) Open organizations: A model for effectiveness,renewal, and intelligent change. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  39. Mirici IH, Saka FO (2004) Dissemination of a proposed English prepartory class model for the Black Sea region countries through internet. Turkish Online Journal of Distant Education 5(2):33-39Google Scholar
  40. Morrison K (1998) Management theories for educational change. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Naicker SR, Mestry R (2016) Leadership development: a lever for system-wide educational change. South African Journal of Education 36(4):1–12Google Scholar
  42. Noriko S (2010) Black ships- the management of change in English language education in a Tokyo elementary school. (Dissertation) International Christian University, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  43. Öztürk M (2015) Modular EFL curriculum in higher education: The case of Hacettepe University. IJCIS 4(8):113-128Google Scholar
  44. Reigeluth CM (2016) Instructional theory and technology for the new paradigm of education. Revista de Educación a Distancia 50(1):1-17Google Scholar
  45. Reigeluth CM, Garfinkle RJ (1994) Systemic Change in Education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Google Scholar
  46. Reigeluth C, Watson SL, Watson W (2008) Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education: Learning management systems. Educational Technology 48(6):32–39Google Scholar
  47. Saldana J (2009) An introduction to codes and coding. The Coding Manual For Qualitative Researchers. Thousands Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwandt T (1994) Constructivist, Interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, London, 118–137Google Scholar
  49. Tanner A (2004) Early implementation of state-level special education systemic change: an exploratory journey into unmapped terrain. (Dissertation). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  50. Watson SL, Reigeluth C (2008) Learner-centered paradigm of education. Educational Technology 48(5): 42-48Google Scholar
  51. Watson WR, Watson SL (2013) Exploding the ivory tower: systemic change for higher education. TechTrends 57(5):42–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webster N, McKechnie JL (1973) Webster's new twentieth century dictionary of the English language. New York, NY: World Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  53. Yin RK (2011) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, California Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey
  2. 2.Middle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations